all 74 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 49 points 3 weeks ago (25 children)
  • [–] 22 points 3 weeks ago (23 children)

    And the following question is "Why?".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Originally the F-150 was a perfect vehicle for most of non-urban America. It was very inexpensive (not a joke), simple to fix (also not a joke), dependable (I swear I'm not trolling), and very utilitarian. Eventually it became an icon and the default purchase for many, even though the more popular models have lost all of the features that made it attractive to begin with.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    It also used to be a reasonable size. Larger than sedans, bit not by nearly as much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    I don't think the article specifically addresses it, but I'd guess that their numbers account for fleet purchases, which are always going to skew the numbers a bit

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    There are many lists of "most popular vehicles" out there. The F-150 tops some of those lists and doesn't even appear on others. There are a lot of games one can play with specificity to make something more prominent ("Ford F-series") or less prominent ("Ram 1500 Rumble Bee") in a list like that.

    But the point -- that we have more pickup trucks than can reasonably be justified -- stands.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Everyone asking why and making jokes about masculinity are missing this point entirely. Ford is the most popular truck when it comes to fleets and actual work trucks, the kind you see with a flat bed or tons of built in metal tool boxes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    the kind you see with a flat bed or tons of built in metal tool boxes

    Those are probably not 150s, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -2 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

    US auto makers failed at making 4 cylinder engines compared to Japan. So they consolidated around the v8 which they did really well. Everything else is a result of marketing and affordability over the years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    GM bought, built and jointly developed four cilinder engines in Europe for decades. They could just as simply brought home the technology and implement it.

    From a long conversation I had with a few people that lived in the US for some decades, it's about the perception of size and power. It's about showing. There is a Camry where I live, gas engine; the car is a land yacht, the engine must be huge. For what? Next to the same car, a BMW is parked every day, smaller engine, much more power, a completely different level of manufacture.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (9 children)

    I don’t agree they failed - there are plenty 4 cylinder and hybrid cars available.
    The thing is- people want trucks, and either they can afford them, or dealers and banks gaslight them to believe they can afford them. So that’s what people buy. I always find it funny when people explain the American auto market’s characteristics by shitting on how stupid American auto industry can’t even make cars. That is irrelevant, a bunch of people drive japanese or european cars if that’s what they want, it’s not like there aren’t imports available. People buy big ass trucks (including Toyota btw) because that’s what they want to drive. It’s that simple.
    Manufacturers make what people want, for the most part.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Not quite. There has been a systemic push to grow the size of US vehicles. Why can you not find ANY small trucks? It's NOT because every American that wants a truck wants a big one.

    This isn't a conspiracy in the loonie sense. It's completely true, though it was a conspiracy to manipulate the market, which succeeded. It started with the Chicken Tax.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I think you misunderstood what a light truck is . All pickups are in this category. A tariff on imports is hardly forcing American manufacturers and consumers to prefer bigger trucks and cars. They could just make them smaller if the smaller versions sold better.
    The purpose of the tariff is:

    to give US domestic automakers an advantage over imported competitors

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Or manufacture desire, let's not forget

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    I don’t understand how you think marketing explains consumer choice for trucks over cars. There’s no central advertising committee that bans the advertising of cars. There are in fact ads for cars and suvs as well. There is no concentrated marketing campaign against cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    This is stricktly anecdotal but in my market it is clearly visible how car advertisement is heavily shifted towards SUVs. On television, magazines, etc. There is more publicity put towards SUVs.

    There isn't a central committee for advertising but it is easy to manufacture desire subtly. If a brand is well know for small hatchbacks but is aware the SUV segment is more popular or returns more profit, the advertisement can be engineered towards that particular segment in detriment of another.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 child)

    Ok mr goal post mover. Is the big conspiracy to sell pickup trucks or to sell suvs? Or they haven’t decided yet?

    is aware the SUV segment is more popular or returns more profit

    That’s reaction to demand (my point) not manufacturing desire.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    In my market [...]

    I was concise.

    There is something I gladly grant to americans and is that they know how to sell anything. If european brands started to create desire for SUVs even by moving away from their signature vehicles, americans can do it as well, if not better, for those monstrosities on wheels.

    Hence, my quip.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    It is interesting seeing Americans always complaining about gas prices(especially now) whilst also owning vehicles that use up fuel by just looking at them.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    Its interesting people outside the US assume in a country of 300 million people that the same people buying trucks are the same people complaining about gas.

    First figure I found was 725,000ish F150s sold in 2022. That only leaves 299,275,000 other people that must not complain about gas if all the complaining is done by the f150 owners.

    My money is on the sales being boosted by fleet purchases of F-150's cuz its tough to find a public works department in any village, town, subarb or even city that doesnt bulk purchase Ford trucks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 3 weeks ago (18 children)

    And the dingleberry on top of the shit sundae is that Ford also killed off the EV version. Sure, the F-150 has a lot of problems simply based on its size. But, it is the most popular vehicle in the US and no amount of whining about it is going to change that fact. So, instead of pissing in the wind, the EV F-150 at least tried to meet people where they are. Unfortunately, sales weren't great and Ford gave up on the project. The only upshot is that the venn diagram of diesel F-150 owners whining about gas prices and Trump voters is a small circle fully inside a larger circle. So, the right people are feeling pain.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

    Wait they're no longer selling the F-150 Lightning? WTF, Ford?!

    That's some VW "Oh we didn't make all the money instantly with BEV cars, so we'll scale down our fleet and effort because of all the poor shareholders"-shortsightedness (which in VW's case at least bit them in the arse properly, because right after they did that reversal BEVs got the upswing that everyone with 10+ braincells knew they'd get based on other countries, and now VW is falling behind)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Yup, it's a dead duck.
    Personally, I'm watching the Slate truck with some interest. As I would kinda like a better way to haul trash/yard debris; but, an F-150 (especially the newer, juiced up ones) seems like the type of overkill reserved for killing a fly with a tactical nuclear weapon. I'd be really happy to have one of the older ('90's era) small trucks with an EV drive train. But those were killed by the rule of unintended consequences.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    You might also be interested in the Ford Fathom.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

    Ya actually, that is interesting. Thanks for the link.

    EDIT: looking at the pictures, it seems like it's still sized around the current F-150 footprint. But maybe that's just the body styling making it look bigger.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    The test platform spottings in the wild put it at Maverick size.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    Digging around, that seems to be [just a bit bigger[(https://www.blueovaltrucks.com/ford-maverick-and-old-school-ford-ranger-comparison/) than the old rangers used to be (before Ford supersized them). So, might be a reasonable size for a light truck.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    As I understand it, the F-150 Lightning was the rare beast that was overengineered in the best way. Ford killed it because they figured out that they made more money making batteries for the grid, so they retooled the facilities for that.

    If you bought a Lightning, don't sell it.

    I wonder if people will start to use AI to replace the code once Ford drops support.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    I would have loved one of the EV F150s, but I'm poor

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    I’m not poor and never would buy one at the current generation, was hoping for them to improve it a bit but here we are

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    25 "Flash" trim (mid tier) here. They took some features away in 2024 (80A charging/V2L) but switched to a heat pump making it more winter efficient. And ditched the phone as a key, which is the only thing I really wish they kept.

    Best vehicle I've owned. And huge space in the back for car seats and crap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Ford isn't giving up on electric trucks. It expects to sell the EV Fathom for less than $30,000 next year, and that EV platform is intended to be the foundation of a wide variety of models, with lessons learned from the F-150 Lightning and the Mustang Mach E. One big one they've talked about is the advantages of designing an EV from the ground up with no intention of sharing a platform with an ICE powertrain, and minimizing weight from wiring and harnesses following inefficient paths.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Just make sure your schadenfreude doesn't evolve into stooping to their level. That's how we've ended up circling the drain even in an age of technological boom.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Now I'm stuck trying to figure out what the EV equivalent of "rolling coal" would be.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago

    Small dick energy is strong with this one

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    Part of it is the sheer diversity of options and trim levels that are all under the same make and model of the Ford F-150. Taking a look at the Ford F-150 trim levels, there are basically 4 gasoline engines, 2 flex fuel engines, 1 hybrid drivetrain, 1 diesel engine, and a now discontinued EV powertrain. There are about 5 body/cab options, and several suspension options.

    In contrast, take, for example, the GM BEV3 platform. It's the Chevy Equinox, Chevy Blazer, Cadillac Lyriq, Cadillac Optiq, Honda Prologue, and Acura ZDX. I've driven several of these and they're all basically the same with different options. There's less diversity in those models than there is for the Ford F-150.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    Isn't this has been #1 for like 25 or 30 years, except one year it was the Camry or something?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    cause they don’t allow cooler cars in the US anymore

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    The two things you need to understand about America(ns)…. American is spread out. Like seriously large and open. This has lead to a lot of “super-sizing” in general. Not just their guts. Houses, cars, etc.

    The second aspect is people buy for the “5% chance”, not their 95% daily habits. What I mean by this is they might have to haul something once a year, or they might end up having to take a long road trip. Rather than renting for that one day, for that one specific purpose they want something that can do it all (incidentally this is also why EVs have had a tough time catching on).

    Those two points make the F150 perfectly slotted to be the most popular “car”.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    No, it's because the US government works for corporations and always has.

    Trucks have gotten bigger because of a concerted effort to manipulate the market by automakers for over 50 years. It started with the Chicken Tax.

    Not everyone that wants a truck is dumb enough to want a big one, even in the US.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

    I don't buy the America-big explanation. For that matter, so is Russia. The original colonies weren't that big, just the Western states with hardly anybody in them. And this culture is on display even in geographically-constrained areas, like Manhattan, Los Angeles, Hawaii, and the like.

    The classics of racism and toxic individualism provide better explanations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    I see it this way: Yes, a lot of our local rural and suburban infrastructure is spread-out and car-centric, but that was a result of our choices and policies. (Which does indeed include a big helping of cloaked racial segregation.) It's not the case that we were forced by geography to do this to ourselves.

    "America is just so spread out" can be read as "We just didn't plan this too well."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    The second aspect is people buy for the “5% chance”, not their 95% daily habits.

    me with my roofbox I've used once. tho it's nice that it's an optional attachment to my wagon that I don't need installed 24/7, and thank fuck for that cuz the wagon it gets attached to is an EV where the aero drag does matter a bit more than in an ICE powered vehicle

    Rather than renting for that one day, for that one specific purpose they want something that can do it all (incidentally this is also why EVs have had a tough time catching on).

    Taycan wagon does it all for me! Highly recommend anyone who's curious about one and can afford a certified used one to definitely consider it! Take advantage of their crazy depreciation!

    Tons of space, enough battery capacity given the excellent DC charging speeds, very fun, very comfy, very very pretty

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Piggybacking off the point some people made about fleet purchases of trucks boosting sales, even with that in mind, out of the top ten vehicles sold its split down the middle with 5 being trucks and only 1 that isnt a fleet targeted truck (the Tacoma being the one truck you dont see many fleets of in the US) and the other 5 are all gas saving sedans, wagon/mini suv like rav4, and 2 electric vehicles. You knock out fleet sales of trucks and id b3 willing to bet that top 10 list jumps to 8 gas conserving whips to 1 maybe 2 pickup trucks.

    https://www.edmunds.com/most-popular-cars/

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    I'm curious why they dont use the Tacoma more. Cheapest Tacoma is 10 grand cheaper that the cheapest f150.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    People don't realize how much of that is due to fleet sales.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    It's not a car, the things are the size of a semi cab. I needed an electric truck and mine is huge too. It's annoying, it doesn't fit anywhere and it's fucking dangerous to pedestrians. Make Trucks Small Again.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago

    This really shows you the state of the average person in the US.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    It depends on where you live

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    Yes, although it breaks down a bit better when you look by state. Unfortunately, iirc Tesla Y was leading in the West and the other sections are just other trucks, like the Silverado.

    I'm half grateful it's not at all true in Los Angeles*, but my neighbor loves loud muscle cars so I can't say we're better. At least in every neighborhood I can spot the asshole pretty easily.

    *Edit, should say overall. Plenty of pavement princesses in some locals. Our trucks in my neighborhood are usually older and full of gardening equipment lol

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    Is it still true that even Rhode Island has/had more truck sales than car sales?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (2 children)