There's an old sci fi story, I probably read it in the 70s, in which archaeologists figure out that a lost civilization on another planet died out because of a financial crisis. Wish I could remember the title or author, but all I remember is the archaeologist saying, "They went bankrupt!"
post
Now I'm wondering if it makes any sense to double up on insurance.
Like finding a second company and getting a policy from them also.
Talk to a broker. Many companies consider dual policies a case of splitting the risk between them, not doubling the payouts even though both premiums are being paid.
That seems odd, since insurance is fundamentally just a bet. There's no reason one can't make two bets on the same thing.
It's how medical insurance works in Canada if you have coverage from two working parents. Not sure about other forms wich is why I said check with a broker.
Thinking about this again, if someone has the money to pay two policies, they can probably self-insure depending on the specifics.
You usually can’t claim on both policies at the same time. I think for car insurance there’s nothing against having multiple policies on the same car, but if you claim on all of them for the same incident, it’s classed as fraud
I'm thinking, that if the companies are miss-evaluating the risk and underpricing, they may not be able to payout fully, or possibly at all in the event of a climate disaster. And since they're underpricing the risk already, then the cost of two policies may be more in line with the actual risk.
Car insurance is a bit different.
Depending on what it's for, how much it's for, and if allowed by laws, perhaps consider self-insurance.
Ultimately it's all Lloyds of London. They insure pretty much every insurance company.
Loyd's runs an insurance brokerage or market, they don't actually underwrite the policies themselves.
They also insure the insurance companies themselves. Insurance companies have to get payout insurance, for if they have to do a big payout.
He's talking about reinsurance. Front-line insurance companies that you typically deal with directly are (sometimes? often?) "reinsured" by other insurance companies backing their risks. It's turtles all the way down.
When my insurer gives me tips on how to reduce my gasoline consumption, I tell them to stop investing in O&G producers.
This article makes no mention of reinsurance, the insurance insurance companies buy from reinsurance companies. Basically they'll take out reinsurance policies from companies like Loyds of London to cover them in case there's a catastrophe, such as a hurricane destroying an entire city, so they can still pay out the claims.
Seems a little odd it isn't mentioned in this article.
I’ve noticed that Automotive insurers have bet heavily on LLMs to replace experienced estimators on repair work.
Lots of vehicles are being written off that can be repaired and lots of repairs are being authorised above the value of the vehicle.
Meanwhile estimators are being forced back into the repair industry, or have taken early retirement.
Retail punters purchasing wrecks at auction and repairing them privately and as a result second-hand parts supplies are drying up. This is also throwing their new LLM based algorithms way off on their estimates for repair costs.
I’m just waiting for the LLM bubble to burst. Anyone who invested any time or money into this scam being marketed as “AI” is going to end up like those Bitcoin and NFT investors…
Lots of vehicles are being written off that can be repaired and lots of repairs are being authorised above the value of the vehicle.
I started watching this one YouTube channel that's an independent body repair guy / vehicle rebuilder. He buys vehicles from insurance auctions and puts them back together. His commentary and transparency was fascinating.
One of the things I have been struck by is the cost of all these parts and pieces. For example the front bumper and clip area of the vehicle will have two $800 headlamps with upgraded LEDs, various crash and parking sensors, an important vehicle engine wiring harness junction, a grill shutter motor etc etc. So you get into a relatively minor front end collision and you're doing a new AC system, new radiator and radiator support PLUS paint and body work PLUS a bonus $3000 in electronic gadgetry that pretty much always needs replacing.
At full retail markup that writes off every car that has a small repairable collision, like the price to get a collision repair place to fix all that is really prohibitive. Lots of the electronics he has to source from the dealerships at absurd pricing.
Lots of the vehicles he's working on start, run and drive fine and don't even need suspension or alignment work. He's basically just replacing all this expensive cladding.
The vehicles seem disposable.
Yep. And a lot of the modules and sensors are designed to prevent people from getting into accidents.
Funnily enough, the professional labour is the most expensive part. Professional repairers can get discounts and rebates on the parts, but at the end of the day, qualified and experienced technicians need to get their hands dirty to repair what needs repairing, replace and recalibrate what needs replacing and prep, paint and install the bodywork.
Your YouTube guy makes money off YouTube that subsidises the labour, which makes him repairing write-offs worthwhile.
This doesn’t work in all markets. For some jurisdictions, once a vehicle has been written off, it cannot be registered for road use ever again. Some let any vehicle get registered for road use; most countries are somewhere in the middle.
Sounds like they’re having a bit of fraud as a treat.
I think the buck stops with reinsurance companies IIRC. Until then the house of cards builds higher
It's probably a good thing that everyone isn't freaking out at the same time, but then again it sure would be nice if we had enough people freaking out to actually do something about it.
It's too late to keep Earth as healthy as it once was, but we can at least slow the impact to preserve as much as possible.
I've heard it said that the insurance industry is the true barometer on the threat of climate change, but I never really could buy into the idea that they would be immune to the tendency to ignore risks in favor of profits. This article just backs that up.
all 21 comments