I've recently played Resident Evil 6 for the 1st time after playing Resident Evil 4 (an absolute masterpiece) & Resident 5 (a pretty good game). I was already aware of the hate this game got over the years. But after experiencing it, it's only bad in an artificial way. Like yeah, it's nothing like the classic games and it's too much in the action category.

Otherwise, as someone who loves action games, it's a pretty fun game. Especially in Mercenaries Mode, where it's fun to mow down body-horror themed enemies. As a Resident Evil game, it's pretty bad. But...as an action third person shooter with splatter punks, it's quite well executed

top 87 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 50 points 3 weeks ago (16 children)

How I Met Your Mother. There's a ton of hate, and it's well deserved. Ted is annoying, Lily's selfish, and Barney could never be a character on national TV now. It tapers off around season 5-6 and then fails in season 9.

However, it had a profound effect on me. I grew up in rural nowhere, Midwest USA, in a town with 2 bars and a gas station. Watching the group go out in the city going to bars and growing up there made me really connect, and made me feel a bit less isolated. I finally did move out and to a different city, and HIMYM did give me the hope to someday be like that, and now I am. I still re-watch every few years. It definitely hasn't aged well, but it's nostalgic for me.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    I’ve always interpreted that show with Marshall as the main character. He goes through the most growth and also has the most altruistic intentions throughout. I see it as a demonstration that your friends and loved ones can be holding you back. Marshall deserved better than that friend group and he rarely if ever sacrifices his morals for the others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Lily especially in this watchthrough I'm noticing how much she does manipulate him. Season 2 leaving of course just destroys him, and then she comes back and just expects to be taken back like it's nothing. Then expects the wedding and everything right after, wanting everything to move on like she didn't just destroy all trust with him. The really sad thing is she left to see if she could be a painter while he never prevented her from doing that while being together, as Ted said there are so many ones in NYC why SF? She wanted to go off and be single, and he took her back way too easily.

    Then getting mad that he talks to his parents, or that he dreamed of maybe living somewhere else, or the credit card debt, or then being mad that he became a corporate lawyer to pay off her credit card debt. I feel bad for the guy

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Thank you! I genuinely believe that Lily is the least agreeable character in the show. Everyone else’s vices are brazen and loud, but she manages to sneak around and not get noticed because of how cute her demeanor is.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Yeah I just watched the episodes today where Marshall is having a crisis of character working for GNB and she gives him the go-ahead (or even the push) to quit his job to pursue his dream, and literally the next episode she is mad at him for doing exactly what she told him to do, and puts Ted on the spot again as she plans to just up and leave for a trip without talking to her husband. Her character wants to be supportive, but wants more to live her lifestyle

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    I loved watching that show, but the premise is a bit off. "Hey kids, let me tell you about all the chicks I banged before your mom."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago* (2 children)

    This is kind of how I feel about Friends too. It gets hated on for very valid reasons. But I will always remember being a teen watching the episode where Rachel and Monica have 1 condom left in the apartment and compete over who gets it. Then Monica goes to tell Chandler (I think?) that they can’t have sex because Rachel won the condom. He whines a bit, but she holds her ground. It’s one of the earliest pieces of media I remember watching that emphasized the importance of safe sex.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    Sex and the city for me. They're rich assholes. They're also outspoken, assertive, strong. They taught a lot to teen me, a nerdy people-pleaser. They were the ones who made me realize I could just say no to men, and that having standards was a good thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    I love HIMYM, but it does indeed have a lot of issues. I did a rewatch and some things were painful to watch I have to admit. It will nonetheless have a special place always in my heart.

    The best it has are probably the songs. Neil Patrick Harris is so talented.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    I'm with you, I love that show. I liked friends too. I love trashy TV, it's like frozen pizza, hits the spot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I think sitcoms are an art form, people compare them to high price dramas and they aren't. Sitcoms are your "friends" after a long day if work that you can count on to be reliable and low pressure. You watch them not for a good story necessarily, but to unwind after a day. Sadly I think that's been lost over the last few years.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    Exactly, you watch them to just watch a bunch of characters get into crazy hijinks that aren't real. Sometimes the writers throw in a serious storyline or some lessons, but for the most part they're not meant to be taken seriously.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 87 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

    I was fine with Waterworld.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    And The Postman.

    But I tend to like post-apocalyptic movies anyway.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    I've always liked the Postman. With the exception of

    spoilerThe scene at the end where society is totally back to normal in a totally unrealistic amount of time and they're unveiling a statue of him. They should have just skipped that and had it end with him riding by the kid and grabbing the envelope.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 3 weeks ago* (2 children)

    Iirc most of the press was just "this cost waaaaay too much to make" rather than "its a bad movie"

    Thanks for reminding me I still need to actually watch it, though. And ive got a few hours to kill.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago

    Waterworld, Sahara, and John Carter are all amazing movies that BOMBED... but by what metric? Tons of money in production and/or inept expensive marketing and it didn't make it back.

    That's all. It wasn't a "market success." But I'm glad they're a part of culture.

    Sahara is the Uncharted movie we deserved. I wish we got more Clive Cussler movies. One of my favorite films.

    John Carter is the reason I will never properly pronounce "Virginia" again.

    Waterworld's stunt show is incredible and the world building was awesome.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago*

    Yes, which reminds me of another hated movie I love: The Cable Guy aka Cabo Goobla:

    "Dry land is not a myth. I've seen it." Kevin Costner. Waterworld. I don't know what the big fuss is about. I saw that movie nine times. It rules!

    - Chip Douglas

    So much so that I'm always surprised when they get the quote wrong in Waterworld itself! 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    Especially back in the day. It was a major action movie event.

    I kind of feel the same way about Cutthroat Island. It was a massive failure, but the production value was great and I thought it was a fun action flick.

    Side Note: Waterworld is one of the few movies I recommend NOT watching the extended cut. The scenes are very low quality and feel like a TV production compared to the rest of the theatrical cut scenes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    I watched that movie when I was a kid and genuinely liked it. (I do still have really broad taste, the question can be answered for me with “most media, apparently”)

    It has a special place in my heart as one of a few dozen vhs we had that I could watch with no restrictions. (One of the banned movies was A clear and Present Danger, and I still don't know why because I can’t stay awake through it because its boring. Another was Pulp Fiction. Maybe the first was a ruse!)

    Is it a good movie? Idk. But smeat is still funny to me in ways that probably would have hit the same if I’d watched it today for the first time, so..

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    I really enjoy the original live action Super Mario Bros movie from the early 90s. The production was an absolute mess from beginning to end, but somehow, an actually watchable movie came out of it, and the story is actually somewhat entertaining, even if it has nothing to do with the actual games.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    I like the Super Mario Bros movie, I don't care how loosely connected it is to the games.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago

    There was actually a deleted scene originally in the movie where an executive from Nintendo met with Mario and Luigi to buy the rights to their story and that the movie was actually what happened and the games are the ones that changed things, which I've always thought was a fun tongue in cheek nod at the source material (or lack thereof).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I know a lot of films and TV pilots start as a writers original idea, sometimes even a great idea, but for one reason or another never get picked up. Or even worse it does get picked up. But in both cases someone says, "This won't sell, can you make it Super Mario themed?"

    The writer, creative as they are and just happy to get work, then mashes the two together.

    I think a film featuring a parallel New York ruled by evolved dinosaurs and deevolution guns is a wild but potentially interesting film. What it has to do with Mario... I have no idea.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
    [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    The Star Wars Prequel Trilogy.

    Story time. I'm nearing 30 and had only seen bits and pieces of the original trilogy (not more than 10 minutes or so at a time), and I saw episode 7 in theatre. Last year, my roommate (who is a huge Star Wars fan) and I decided to watch through the whole series. We started with the original, then trudged through the sequels so we could line up the prequel rewatch with the 20th anniversary of episode 3 and see it in theatre.

    I went into it "knowing" that the originals were the best, the sequels were embarrassingly bad, and the prequels were pretty heavily shit on but still decent. I actually ended up liking the prequels more. From a technical standpoint I'd argue that they are probably "worse" movies. There's the obvious things that don't make sense (like Anakin being a child in episode one and a young adult in episode two yet Padme looks relatively unchanged) and the dialogue is certainly goofy at times, but I felt a lot more connected to the story and had more fun with the prequels than the originals.

    The sequels were, in fact, absolute dog shit though.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Really, a lot of the prequel hate comes from them taking such a huge step down from the OT. In 1999, The Phantom Menace was the first major Star Wars film in 16 years; it wasn't just a cool new thing, it was a cultural event. People expected great things.

    Obviously it failed at that. Not once, but twice. Revenge of the Sith barely even got a chance.

    And so the backlash was brutal. While the critique wasn't unfair in its points, it also came from a perspective of starkly emotional disappointment. People say the prequels are looked at more fondly now due to 'nostalgia', but mostly I think it's that the emotional pain has faded and we can analyze them more objectively as flawed, but ultimately solid films rather than 'disasters'.

    It may be that one day the sequels will be more coldly studied as well, with more focus placed on the issues produced by cycling directorship and management pressures... but I also think even a coldly analytical appraisal of them will still come up as "hollow and emotionless".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    flawed, but ultimately solid films rather than ‘disasters’.

    I think they might still be at least verging on disasters, though certainly more interesting ones than JJ's movies (see elsewhere in this thread for my thoughts on TLJ). The PT actually reminds me a lot of other passion projects (Megalopolis is probably the most recent, and surprise surprise, Coppola is a friend and mentor) that reveal the limitations of deferring to the auteur's singular vision in a collaborative artform.

    The "saved in the edit" narrative for ANH is disingenuous I think, inserting a miracle for a particularly strong example of how the workflow for a weird project should work, but it does hint at the truth that somebody like Lucas has as many bad ideas as good ones, and only the ones he can sell to fellow respected professionals should stay in the final product.

    I also think it's fair to say that because he was frustrated by the "compromises" with actors, writers, directors, and studios who all felt they were equal stakeholders, the unfiltered Lucas was a jarring departure from the OT, yet ostensibly targeted the exact same demographics, and that made it even harder to evalute the PT on its own terms. For me personally, I could never truly get over the stilted line readings that felt exactly like the cheesy serials that Lucas loved, but that the New Hollywood "kids" and British stage veterans refused to let infect the OT. "You can write this shit, George, but you can't say it."

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    I've never understood the hate for the prequels. I thought The Phantom Menace was kind of boring and I've never successfully removed Jar Jar's voice from my head, but I straight up liked Attack of The Clones and Revenge of The Sith.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    The sequels have a bipolar plot, it gives you whiplash seeing the tonal shift and direction change each movie goes through.

    The prequels are definitely flawed (George, how much political mumbo jumbo do you really think people want to see in their space wizard drama?) but they have a more or less coherent story. You can see how A>B>C and it makes sense.

    Plus, the absolute memefest that the prequels turned into has helped a ton.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    The prequels are the only Star Wars movies that I regularly rewatch. The other 6 are never on at our house, and the spin off movies are completely ignored.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Rogue One and Andor are pretty good

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    Rogue One has some banger set-pieces, and it's a decent enough war movie in Star Wars cosplay, but while it's fun to watch it after Andor, doing so also really underlined to me how thin and overhyped I think it was.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 51 points 3 weeks ago (18 children)

    Different entertainment genre, but Nickelback.

    Although I'm reasonably certain that 99% of people who hate on NB would sing along if it came on the radio.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    I have a friend, whom I typically respect, who surprised me with that hot take one day. He had similar things to say about Creed and Taylor Swift.

    Hes also been known to cheat at DnD, though. I love the guy but...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    This makes D&D very unfun. You don't win DnD. You enjoy DnD with friends.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Yeah, as the DM i was very much tempted to call him on it a few times, but i figured it would do more harm than good. So I tried to get creative, which mostly worked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    The big problem, at least to me, is that they were massively overplayed on the radio and I grew tired of hearing the same song over and over again.

    Now hearing them again after a long break, I can recognize that they made some decent - not great, but still decent songs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    That's how I feel about Adele. Rolling in the Deep might even be objectively good but it GRATES on me because you'd hear it EVERYWHERE. ALL THE TIME.

    I think a lot of decent artists are foisted upon the public so forcefully they become loathed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    I don't mind their one song. But that's the thing, they only have one song. (They all sound the same.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    Well, not really. For example, my favourite Nickelback song, Sister Sin, is rather different from This Afternoon, or For the River, or Just to Get High, or many others. But they definitely do have a number which are rather similar to others of theirs - but then, I honestly have never listened to a band which didn't have some that sounded a bit similar to others? Like, most Ed Sheeran songs are Ed Sheeran songs, most Sleep Token songs are Sleep Token songs...

    That said, Chad Kroegar's voice is so distinctive that it makes everything they do sound instantly Nickelback.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    But that’s the thing, they only have one song. (They all sound the same.)

    Mumford & Sons, Hootie & the Blowfish, and Live all say "Hi!" and want to know if they can join the party.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    I am not ashamed to admit that I have their first album, and it's a solid one with quite a few solid tracks on it. However, I always hated that song, which by far became the most popular one.

    I don't know much about their later stuff, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
  • [–] 22 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    "Some body once told me, the world was gonna roll me, I ainʻt the sharpest tool in the shed..."

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    All Star is on my hate list because I've heard it too many times at this point. It joins

    • Don't Stop Believing by Journey
    • Bohemian Rhapsody by Queen
    • Nevermind by Nirvana
    • A few Red Hot Chili Peppers songs
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    You forgot something that you're going to start remembering very soon

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    sword art online, sure it doesn't have a sensible plot or good writing but it has so much potential.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • I watched it fresh back in the day and I liked it too.

    The one thing that really gets me is that in a world that loves gaming, they didn’t have a regulating body or at least Gamers’ Nexus to look over the headset and say, “this could fucking kill someone.” I get that it would kill the entire franchise but I feel like they could have tried harder.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›