Rep. Delia Ramirez is expected to introduce a bill to abolish the Department of Homeland Security and eliminate all immigrant detention in the United States on Tuesday, the Illinois Democrat shared exclusively with The Intercept.

The Reimagining Safety Act would repeal “duplicative and overreaching terrorism laws,” according to the bill summary and text, and curtail the widespread surveillance state that emerged in the wake of 9/11 terror attacks.

It comes the day after agents from Homeland Security Investigations searched the home of Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., in what the Department of Justice has described as an opaque “federal criminal investigation.” HSI is a component of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, the agency at the center of mounting concerns about the violent weaponization of DHS against immigrants and the Trump administration’s perceived political enemies.

The sweeping legislation faces long odds in Congress, but Ramirez argues that strictly limiting the government’s immigration enforcement apparatus is critical for public safety in the wake of yet another shooting by federal immigration agents.

[

Related

ICE Agent on Scene of NYC Shooting Was Posing as Construction Worker, Eyewitness Says](https://theintercept.com/2026/10/08/ice-nyc-shooting-federal-agent/)

Last Thursday, an ICE agent shot 28-year-old Oscar Belgal in the neck by firing into his car, where Belgal’s 5-year-old child was in the backseat, in New York City. Belgal was the latest of at least 25 people shot by federal immigration agents in the past year; six of those shootings were fatal. Deaths in detention are also surging under Trump. As of early October, at least 28 people have reportedly died in ICE custody this year, according to the National Immigration Project.

“Just this week, our communities were reminded that DHS is a weapon: pointed at a father shot in front of his 5-year-old and at Congresswoman Omar, who is using her voice to demand an end to fascism,” wrote Ramirez in a statement to The Intercept. “It is clear that now is the time to reimagine our safety, dismantle DHS, abolish ICE, and end the use of broad authorities to circumvent our rights and due process.”

Ramirez’s bill seeks to replace DHS with a new agency called the Department of Community Safety, which would oversee the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The new department would also fund new public safety measures like providing support to community violence intervention programs and public health-backed approaches to gun violence. And it would implement a new program where social workers, medical professionals, and interpreters aid asylum-seekers who arrive at the border.

Other DHS functions would be transferred to existing agencies. The DOJ would take over immigration enforcement authority; the Department of Transportation would assume the functions of the Transportation Security Administration and the Coast Guard; and the Department of the Treasury would conduct customs enforcement.

[

Related

“Terrorist”: How ICE Weaponized 9/11’s Scarlet Letter](https://theintercept.com/2026/02/06/spencer-ackerman-9-11-terrorists-ice/)

The Department of Homeland Security has only existed since George W. Bush established it in 2003, ushering in a new era of broad federal surveillance and policing powers that the new legislation now seeks to roll back.

For example, the bill would prevent the federal government from placing people on the “no-fly list” without a criminal conviction or warrant. Civil liberties advocates have frequently criticized the database that restricts people from air travel, arguing it’s arbitrary, secretive, and racially biased.

The legislation would also terminate the ability of the secretary of state to declare “foreign terrorist” organizations, arguing that the arbitrary list has been weaponized against protesters and civil liberties groups.

In 2025, Trump’s State Department attempted to revoke the visas of several students who had protested or spoken out against Palestine under the guise that their support for Palestinians amounted to “material support” for Hamas, making them immediately deportable. The Treasury Department, meanwhile, in August sanctioned Palestine Action, a U.K.-based group that opposes Israel’s genocide in Gaza, as a foreign terrorist organization, allowing the federal government to freeze all the group’s U.S. assets, impose travel restrictions, and ban U.S. companies from conducting business with the organization.

[

Related

How ICE Arrests Went Quiet — and Got Even More Deadly](https://theintercept.com/2026/07/14/ice-shootings-maine-houston/)

The raid on Omar’s home, Ramirez said, is just the latest example to underscore how the Trump administration has weaponized DHS in particular. President Donald Trump and his allies have routinely and without evidence accused Omar, who became a U.S. citizen in 2000, of immigration fraud and threatened to deport her back to Somalia.

In a statement to The Intercept, Omar spokesperson Jackie Rogers called the raid “an outrageous abuse of power and an unprecedented escalation in the weaponization of federal law enforcement to target political enemies.”

Ramirez said the search was an example of DHS “acting as designed.”

“DHS has been utilized by the government to target and persecute those they consider the public enemy.”

“DHS is not rogue,” wrote the congresswoman. “For 23 years, since its inception, DHS has been utilized by the government to target and persecute those they consider the public enemy — whether it is Muslim-Americans, Haitians escaping violence, Latinos yearning for a better life, or dissenting voices demanding an end to the genocide in Palestine and the kidnapping of our neighbors.”

Congress is currently in recess until after the November elections to give members a chance to campaign, which means the bill won’t get a vote until November 9 at the earliest. The legislation is highly unlikely to pass this session. Republicans maintain the majority, and only a handful of Democratic members have called for abolishing Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Still fewer have called for abolishing the Department of Homeland Security.

But Ramirez said she hopes this bill shows what is legislatively possible if lawmakers want to unravel the surveillance and carceral state that has arisen in the last two decades.

“Every person dead in detention, everyone shot or killed by ICE and CBP, every neighbor deported to a third country, every family separated, every community FEMA failed,” wrote Ramirez, “every miscarriage due to substandard care, every dissenter wrongfully branded, targeted, and persecuted as ‘terrorist,’ and every threat against our elections by Trump, Markwayne [Mullin], and [Stephen] Miller is a reason DHS must be dismantled and something new must take its place.”

The post Don’t Stop at ICE, Says Progressive Dem: Abolish the Department of Homeland Security appeared first on The Intercept.


From The Intercept via This RSS Feed.

1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 12 points 3 weeks ago

Yes!

It was created under a false premise. It's vicious and evil.

  • source
  • 77 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 80 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago

    A lot of us remember an America without it and the DHS. They are both 9/11 knee jerk reactions that have been nothing but bad for us, exactly like the Afghanistan and Iraq invasions. We would have been so much better off to just take the (L) after 9/11 but W kept trying for a (W).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    I think a live streamed execution of George W. Bush would be a good way to build back the patriotism after we destroy the Patriot Act. A legal execution of course after he is found guilty for his countless war crimes. Then we can do Clinton, Obama, Biden, and Trump.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    a live streamed execution of George W. Bush

    This is no better than live streaming Hasan Nidal's execution. The US may be fucked, but it's still better than that, currently.

    Just ratify the Rome Statute like we should have, instead of backing out in 2002. Let the International Criminal Court try US government officials for their many international crimes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Yes. The comment was meant to be tongue in cheek in reference to that. We don't have to live stream it. I think it would be better to sell tickets. Do it in a major sports stadium.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    I've thought about this a lot and if it were up to me, I wouldn't harm a hair on his head. I'd simply extradite him to Afghanistan and let them decide what to do with him. They deserve first dibs, plus it's deliciously ironic considering how Bush skirted torture laws by extraditing prisoners to be tortured in other countries.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 60 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    DHS has always been a dystopian reminder of the ruination of America that began with the response to 9/11. I never agreed to give up any freedom for their security theater. They just did all that shit to us.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago

    You might not have. But Americans reelected Bush after all these awful post 9/11 policies. There was no appetite for an antiwar and anti surveillance state post 9/11. Americans aren't all victims. They are just mostly sheep.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 89 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    Abolish the police state, don't stop at DHS.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    Gotta slowly reverse boil the frog - these are definitely great first steps and will hopefully warm the public up to demilitarizing, then defanging, then defunding/abolishing the police state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    Nope, unless they promise to immediately fix every problem they're not worthy of supporting

    /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago

    OMG someone on lemmy who understands that things don't happen over night. I had heard such people existed but I seriously doubted it. The majority I run into think it could all be gone by next election cycle if we all voted for some fringe candidate with no hope of election.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 32 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    It's crazy how many people think we've always had DHS...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 3 weeks ago

    Yep, start rolling back all those patriot act police state bullshit.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    DHS formed in the wake of 9/11 because federal agencies could not get their shit together and collaborate. Whether by design or rapid evolution, it became less of a coordinating agency between disparate federal intelligence agencies and more of a mysterious extra-judicial entity with a military arm. Oh and TSA. Let's not forget about humble ole' TSA.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    It does make sense to have someone who coordinates all the different federal police and intelligence forces in the country. The US has TSA, ATF, FBI, CIA, NSA, DEA, Secret Service, Federal Marshals, even the USPS has a police force.

    Without some kind of coordination you have undercover agents of one service being wiretapped and followed by another service. Plus, you get the kinds of things that happened around 9/11 where each agency had a slice of the picture but they weren't sharing info so nobody had the whole picture.

    I think in a sensible country ATF would be the alcohol branch, tobacco branch and firearms branches of the federal police force. DEA would be the drug enforcement arm of that federal police force. It seems really strange to me that the FBI is basically the federal police force, but for some reason when it comes to firearms-related crime, that's someone else's department.

    Also, in a sensible country, someone would be policing the police. I don't actually think any country has properly figured that out though. In reality, it seems like an important role for the police is to enforce the status quo, and ensure that the people on top remain on top and the people on the bottom remain there. That allows police to place themselves slightly below the people on top, but importantly significantly above those on the bottom. Because of that, I don't think the rich and powerful in any country really want a fully controlled police force, otherwise they can't do the extra-judicial things that maintain the hierarchy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago*

    We've sure tried to forget them, but even though they miss 95% of the bomb exercises they are put through, they insist that we dont move on from them.

    Itd be faster and just as effective if we made a bonfire of our money at the airport and all just emptied our wallets into it as we passed by them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    The duplicative nature of DHS isn’t incompetence, it’s deliberate deception. DHS was created to put down dissidents in America, not terrorists.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 13 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Honestly, I'm more scared of TSA than anything they are supposedly preventing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    They do prevent a lot water bottles and belt buckles that would otherwise be a serious threat to the safety of good law-abiding citizens.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago

    💯

    It was created in my lifetime and it totally fucking sucks. If we have to cut things because of budgetary concerns, it's a great candidate.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago

    I see your dhs and raise you the police.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    At this point, it's going to be neigh on impossible to do away with the DHS. Few have any idea of just how much stuff has been crammed into that department. Everything from law enforcement down to FEMA and even the fire trucks and boots your local fire department use.

    That monster is huge.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Huh, almost like that was the point -- make it so sprawling people can't comprehend getting rid of it. Too bad a lot of us remember a world before the DHS, and it wasn't rampant street terrorism in the USA like they'd have you believe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 weeks ago

    I do too. And I'm far older than most people here.

    I have had to deal with the byzantine bureaucracy we had before and the mess we have now. As I said, killing DHS would be a difficult thing because of the short sighted politicians and the short sighted electorate. Y'all got what you wanted.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 28 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    No party is more progressive than Democrats when they know their bills have absolutely no hope in hell of passing.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    It's not the party, though. There are progressive members of the party, and when they introduce bills like this, the rest of the Democrats cough uncomfortably, and sidle away quietly, leaving the brave progressive to bear the full brunt of the right-wing outrage machine. (See, for example, the Green New Deal.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago*

    I also advocate for incrementalism, but I do think that very progressive positions need to be staked out and anchored by certain members in Congress, to move the Overton window allowing more moderate Democrats to 'make compromises' and still land everyone in a better position.

    For DHS/ICE, if Congress can't herd enough cats to abolish them, they can hamstring anything they are permitted to do without a judge-signed warrant. They can also first cut the slush fund appropriated in 2025. If neither of those things work, they can change the purpose of DHS/ICE to go after employers who abuse undocumented workers or leverage restrictive visas against them, and help immigrants get visas instead of locking up and torturing them.

    It's easier to settle on the three improvement positions if the initial anchor is closer to the extreme.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago

    Abolishing it should be the minimum.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    This is your reminder that KGB meant (in Russian) basically the same thing as Department of Homeland Security.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    The whole position and power of the DHS needs to be reviewed and reworked. In most other countries, this is handled by the equivalent Department of the Interior. The department doesn't need to have it's own unchecked military force to get the job done.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    Abolish conservatism.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Sounds radical.

    But I can't think of a single reason why we shouldn't abolish DHS

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Homeland Security was a Bush Administration creation too, in the wake of 9/11 that they used to do things they long wanted.

    Just as they submitted the patriot act like 10 days after, a thousand page law referencing other laws, something that would take years to create. They had it already, that was their wish list.

    Homeland Security denies the Bill of Rights applies to them, and should be abolished.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    The next time there's a 9/11 blowback on our soil, they won't have pre drafted the patriot act 2.0.

    They'll just ask Grok to draft it, and all the Reps will pass it, after having had Grok read it for them. Then it will pass, hallucinations and all, without anyone having actually read it in full.

    And then, years later, judges will ask Grok how we should interpret it, when deciding if the countless human rights violations were legal under it

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    Ha ha, it sounds all too plausible I'm afraid, meaning it's not stupid enough for what will happen in the future, sorry, I don't make the rules.

    But we are on the Patriot Act III now, they did II just a year or two after the first one. But, as the aforementioned rule suggested, they will likely name it something much more stupid. We are like the reverse of the improvement curve of computer chips fitting more transistors onto a chip.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago*

    Abolish the Republican party. Abolish corporate entities. Abolish private ownership of powerful technology. Abolish secret science in the form of private research. Everyone needs to know what you're doing with the worlds resources and whether it's a threat to the community. Eliminating the privacy of the powerful is the only surveillance system that is actually needed, for the safety of the community.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago

    Abolish the presidency

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    The people who will fight this the hardest will be the long toothed democrats unfortunately

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    I think a lot of Americans actually like the idea of a security state apparatus. They want a sky-daddy to protect them.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • It certainly seems that way, as long as said apparatus ensures their team stays in power. The alternative, consistently and actively engaging in politics, was too much.

    They used to sell a slow cooker whose catch phrase was "set it and forget it." This also described prevailing attitudes about political engagement beyond elections.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Go further abort Capitalism

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 weeks ago

    In theory, a cabinet-level department can be removed with a bill that says "this entity is no longer a thing". But capitalism isn't an entity... You can't really remove it so much as you set up entirely new policies that would replace it. And that is a much different ball of wax to figure out

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago

    that turd of an agency was Orwellian in 02'

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Everything needs to go and we need to start over, any less will not be enough

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (2 children)

    What makes you believe that we'd magically just end up with something better? Nearly 80 million people voted for Trump after he already had 4 years in office. Those people didn't just vanish.

    Even the French Revolution, the shining example that everyone here loves to reference (guillotines), almost immediately turned into a pure dictatorship.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    I'm with her on this but it's not going to happen

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    Hands off the deep state lady

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    Realistically what does the dhs even do? Wouldn’t it be more efficient to abolish them and give their authority and funding to the states?

  • source
  • [–] -2 points 3 weeks ago

    Won’t pass

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    "Defund the police" was a major contributor to Trump winning again. That's not a message a lot of the country reacts well to.

    Same thing here. Win before you start saying shit like this.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    ICE is under DHS. DHS is also doing a bunch of wildly unpopular political "investigations". There are also a lot of concerns about surveillance in general, which DHS is definitely doing (like buying adtech data on everyone) It is not at all controversial to call for scrapping the whole department. Maybe the messaging needs refinement.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago* (1 child)

    Defund the police was a popular slogan in 2020, the year that Trump lost. Also, 65% of Americans polled thought burning down the Minneapolis East Precinct was justified.

    Also, DHS is much smaller & newer than the idea of police departments. America existed for a long time without DHS, so I don’t even think these are equivalent things at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 weeks ago

    Most of the country still thinks the Dems want to defund the police, and most don't want it. They also aren't going to be too well informed about how DHS fits into the country: it sounds like it's protecting them, and taking it away is being "soft on crime" or "open borders". That turns the conservatives out, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 3 weeks ago

    Of course the federal criminal investigation is opaque. They all are; if they were transparent, everyone involved would flee justice and destroy evidence. Ramirez is a rep and should know better.

    Anyway, I'm all for the deconstruction of our layers of police state, this is something that progressive dems and classic conservatives can agree on (and everybody in between).

    I like police, I'm just not into multiple different agencies doing the same work. It's redundant and it costs billions, we don't need US Border Patrol, ICE, and Department of Homeland Security. Just local and FBI is sufficient.

    However, Omar is a thief, and she should be investigated thoroughly, she stinks of corruption and rot. She had no money in 2018 when she was elected, now 8 years later she's a multi-millionaire. She's knee deep in welfare fraud, with her friends already serving decades behind bars for stealing tens of millions of dollars from the welfare system.

    She's stealing from the most vulnerable of people, the very people that she should be helping.

    ... and when Democrats take the majority in a couple weeks, they should also root out and arrest every corrupt Republican that they can (instead of sitting on their ass like they did when Biden was in office). I'm fine with bOtH pArTiEs investigating the other. More of this.

  • source