It seems to differ from platform to platform. While Reddit's bot activity has not slowed down much, on Twitter the engagement with Reform MPs posts has dropped by around 2/3.
post
So people are assuming "bot" means what Twitter users refer to as "bots" and "fewer bots" could just be "fewer web crawlers".
They don't care about bots, they care about things that trigger their cognitive dissonance. If the bot is contributing to their echo chamber, they love it.
You of all people talking about other people enjoying their echo chamber is goddamn hilarious given the one you moderate.
Doesn't mean they're wrong!
I'll just upvote the both of you. We all need to be more aware of our echo chambers.
Keeping the trash out is not creating an echo chamber. It's not my fault if they can't follow the goddamn rules.
Quite the stupid article.
Quick question even if bots go through residential proxies isn't that like last mile thing the command infra remains the same right?
"Not quite true" sounds like another way of saying "true".
Bot traffic is down: meaning the bots that Yandex used to index webpages for their search engine. The article doesn't take very long to make that point; you could have just skimmed it to see that (I did).
So it's true, but not in the way people mean it when they say "all the russian bots are gone!".
all 16 comments