all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It seems to differ from platform to platform. While Reddit's bot activity has not slowed down much, on Twitter the engagement with Reform MPs posts has dropped by around 2/3.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 month ago

    So people are assuming "bot" means what Twitter users refer to as "bots" and "fewer bots" could just be "fewer web crawlers".

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    I'm just glad for the silence, even if it won't last.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    They don't care about bots, they care about things that trigger their cognitive dissonance. If the bot is contributing to their echo chamber, they love it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    You of all people talking about other people enjoying their echo chamber is goddamn hilarious given the one you moderate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Quick question even if bots go through residential proxies isn't that like last mile thing the command infra remains the same right?

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    "Not quite true" sounds like another way of saying "true".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago*

    Bot traffic is down: meaning the bots that Yandex used to index webpages for their search engine. The article doesn't take very long to make that point; you could have just skimmed it to see that (I did).

    So it's true, but not in the way people mean it when they say "all the russian bots are gone!".

  • source
  • parent