no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
5 comments in c/linux@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 38 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

Well, at least they open-sourced it

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    It’s sad because they are one of a very few browsers not on chromium. It had a lot of potential.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    Yeah, I wanted it to be my main browser in a year, but it probably won't be. Now the only other Linux WebKit browser I know is gnome web (epiphany), it isn't very good, though it also have good potential

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago
    2 comments in c/LinuxNews@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Good. Focus on search.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago

    Kagi says that keeping a browser running on multiple platforms usually requires either a lot of funding or a big open-source community.

    It's unfortunate they (apparently) didn't recognize this much earlier and actually try to build such a community. While it's good that the now-abandonware's code will become available to people who may find uses for it, it's still sad to see a project unceremoniously dumped this way.

  • source