In short: Internal documents from the Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions show more than 100 trees were felled in a prescribed burn on WA's south coast last year.

The fire burned 99 per cent of the prescribed area and damaged close to 100 rare red tingle trees that do not grow anywhere else on the planet.

What's next? The Leeuwin group, a consortium of WA's top environmental scientists, has urged the government to amend its burn program to avoid another mass felling.

top 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 1 year ago*

tl;dr: They fucked up with this particular burn. Prescribed burns are an important part of our forestry programs.

SOURCE: Studied forestry in college. Seen it in action locally. It works.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    why burn them? at least use the damn wood..

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    oh, never mind. would still have been nice to invite some people to come haul logs for timber. prescribed furniture.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    I need new glasses. And a cleaner mind. i thought the headline said:

    "prescribed bums"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment