Rome (AFP) – Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni's cabinet adopted a decree law Thursday banning burqas and niqabs in schools and capping the number of students with a poor command of Italian per class.

It introduces "A 30 percent cap on the number of students in a class who do not have an adequate command of Italian, more tools for learning our language, and a ban on the burqa and niqab in schools," Meloni wrote on social media.

If a child seriously struggles to integrate at school, social services will be called and the parents will be obliged to attend free Italian lessons.

Failure to comply will be punished with a fine of up to 1,000 euros ($1,140).

Italy is a frontline country for migration and integration is a hot campaign issue ahead of next year's general election.

Save the Children warned forcing children to change schools or enrol in a different institution from their peers simply because of their nationality or limited proficiency in Italian would "create 'first-class' and 'second-class' students".

But Education Minister Giuseppe Valditara said "inadequate language proficiency... hinders educational progress".

"Parental participation in their child's educational path is fundamental for academic success", he told journalists.

...

all 56 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 16 points 1 month ago (4 children)

They ban stuff like this but let catholics run free

Hypocrites

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago* (3 children)
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    When a woman -- or worse, a young girl -- is forced to cover her face, she is being denied fundamental rights

    Bodily autonomy is a fundamental right and catholics deny this

    Banning one religion for controlling women but allowing another is hypocrisy, not whataboutism

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (1 child)

    Can you point to examples in Europe - apart from some Muslim-majority countries - where women are legally or socially required to cover their faces or hair?

    I see Islam as more than simply a religion in the conventional sense: it is also a comprehensive legal and social doctrine. In my view, Christianity went through a historical process of separating religious belief from many aspects of civil law and political authority, whereas Islam developed differently.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Can you point to examples in Europe - apart from some Muslim-majority countries - where women are legally or socially required to cover their faces or hair?

    Head coverings aren't the only form of restricting bodily autonomy. I'm talking about abortion. Something which religious people, Muslim and Christian, push to actively ban.

    Christianity went through a historical process of separating religious belief from many aspects of civil law and political authority

    Christianity did not go through this process. The people under Christianity went through the process of enforcing separation of religious belief and civil law. There are people in Ireland who are still alive and remember when the catholic Irish constitution stated explicitly that a woman's role is in the house. Laws were created around this, including limiting the job opportunities of married women. The movement to lift this was pushed by all women, not just Christian women. Morocco also had laws restricting womens right to work, and women, including Muslim women, pushed to lift them.

    I see Islam as more than simply a religion in the conventional sense: it is also a comprehensive legal and social doctrine

    All religions are comprehensive with their social doctrine. A key aspect of religion is telling people how to live and why. Different groups at different times have chosen whether or not to enforce their own lighter or harsher interpretations or misinterpretations of these doctrines on the people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 month ago

    Ah, the generic metrics in use will ensure that any "true" Italian child who is struggling will receive support and others will receive "support" / imposed difficulties.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Ban all religious symbols in public

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] -12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Modesty is a Christian virtue, so I guess we all go naked?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Picking on brown kids is fun I guess

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago*
    [–] 19 points 1 month ago (27 children)

    This is so incredibly racist

  • source
  • hideshow 27 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 month ago (17 children)

    Religion is not a race. Islam hates women.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (13 children)

    Islam hates women.

    Seen the life of a Catholic nun?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Most religions hate/discriminate against women, not sure what your point is with this though as it doesn't negate what they said at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 month ago* (9 children)

    That's their own choice. Do you know what women go through in Afganishtan? Syria? Iran?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Hijab is also a personal choice

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago (5 children)

    Not when you get murdered in your home country if you don't wear it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    As if there aren't Muslim men/women who would shun/harm another Muslim for not following the rules they prefer.

    Literally think one step further guy, it's a similar idea as to why power dynamics are an issue when it comes to dating subordinates. It's not as simple as "person decides they want this" its a whole host of environmental and societal factors at play that influence that decision making.

    Edit: If you don't believe me, here you go https://www.ansa.it/english/newswire/english_service/2026/07/15/murder-convictions-become-definitive-for-family-of-honour-killing-victim-saman_fe98e044-c454-4f14-ad67-ba8a5474d162.html

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    You are right, Religion is in fact not a race. However, it is strongly associated with race especially when it comes to fear of outsiders. After 9/11 white muslim men had no issues when going though airports. However, if you happened to look Arab you likely where harassed by airport security.

    As for Islam, beliefs vary wildly and include people from many different backgrounds. I don't think anyone should be forced into a religion but people should be allowed to practice their faith.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago*

    Yes, they can practice their faith, just not in public or in schools. For that matter, no one in a position of power should represent a religion either. I agree with Quebec. That goes for islam and christianity. Most importantly, no religious symbols in government. EVER! keep it out of politics.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -6 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    Do you even know what a burka is? Also the "foreign student" ban is based on language competency, which does make sense I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Do you know what a Burka is? Discriminating like this is a form of nationalism that has a very dark history

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 child)

    Yes it's something that covers your entire head and face, only leaving a small slit for your eyes to barely see through it. Do you REALLY support that!? Would you like to be taught by someone, or teach someone, when you can't even see their face?

    (Maybe you are confusing it with a Hijab?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    which does make sense I guess.

    I don't know what the situation is specifically in Italy... but at least in my Western industrialized nation, students generally have very poor reading and language comprehension skills—in addition to a short attention span—thanks to TikTok and similar platforms. I just can't imagine that things are any different in Italy right now.

    Accordingly, all students would have limited language skills, whether they come from immigrant backgrounds or not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Funny thing is, the recent PISA tests showed an overall cognitive decrease, but it was markedly more severe for children with no immigrant background.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    It’s actually crazy how racist / intolerant most Europeans are. In the USA we get the vibe that it’s the absolute worst here, but then you see them talk about Muslims or the Romani and its mask off.

  • source
  • [+] -11 points 1 month ago (12 children)

    Well done Italy.

    This should be the rule everywhere. Signs of oppression should have no room in places of education, culture or civilization in general.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Do you even realize Italy is one of the most Catholic countries in the world, with religious symbols everywhere? Will they also force the nuns who are traching to not wear religious clothing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    If it were for me, yes sure! of course! Sadly it's not, so let me at least enjoy the good-ish news of pushing back one of the fiercest advocate of religious stupidity in this planet ridden by god-fearing haired apes.

    And yes, I realize. We have holiday-residence in Sicily. It's very blatantly obvious everywhere...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    But what of the Muslim men who are forced to have impure thoughts of the unsheathed Muslim women?

    Won't somebody think of the oppressors???

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    The leftys sticking up for islam makes no sense to me at all. Human rights? Women's rights? wtf?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

    It's a tolerance paradox.

    Do you accept religious freedoms as an excuse to withdraw women's rights, or anybodies autonomy?

    Is it the states place to determine which is more important to the individual?

    Is it appropriate to call out one specific headdress, which directly specifies one religion?

    I think a fairer example would be to say no indoor headcoverings or hair accessories larger than 3 inches in any dimension (except for wigs and toupees). No religious exemptions. Absolutely nothing concealing the face without a medical exemption.

    That covers burqas, beanies, and baseball caps. Gaiters and ghutrahs. Turbans and taqiyahs. Also covers yamulkes and everything else right on up to the papal tiara.

    Thats a fair safety and security measure for a public building, I think. That covers nearly all religions headdresses (which ultimately have no place in a school...we don't let God in, ergo he can't judge, right?), as well as anything that could be used to obfuscate a person's identity (which is one intent of the burqa restriction).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments