This is not new. When I was teaching elementary about 20 years ago I was told the same thing. I’ve had to change grades because someone never helped their child but had a big enough mouth to change the principal’s mind about the kid’s grades. After 25 years I burned out badly. I loved the job but hated the useless nonsense that stopped me from actually doing my job.
post
(You should include the text for people with disabilities)
I’m as apathetic as the students
Teacher Support &/or Advice
We‘re not allowed to fail them. The lowest they can get is a 53.
I teach seniors. They need my class to pass. Admin has given thinly veiled threats about failing them. It looks bad for the school and affects funding and that’s all they care about.
They pass even if they don’t show up. One girl came to school only 2 months out of the 10 and passed with a B last year as a junior. I have her now and it’s the same bullshit.
“Rigor“ is a joke. They’re 3-4 grade levels behind and we often have to go over middle school level lessons, yet admin is down everyone‘s throat about rigor.
Discipline is a joke. They don’t do detention anymore, so the kids know that they can misbehave. They’re only suspend for serious offenses like drug use or fighting.
Parents are uninvolved and for some reason that’s the teacher’s fault. They never answer the phones for calls home about discipline, but come graduation time they’re yelling and screaming because their child has failed senior year(though not really, we just give them a packet of work at the end and then they pass 🙄)
Were given limited supplies and often have to purchase our own. We got a grant last year from the district and I purchased 3 toners since I want them to do handwritten work as often as possible because they use AI too much on their Chromebooks. All three were stolen by other staff members and no one is being held accountable.
There was never any real support when I stared out 2 yeas ago and although I love my fellow veteran teachers they’re just as stressed and busy to ever properly mentor me.
Everything is always broken and never gets fixed. Microwave, elevator(had to carry heavy supplies up three flights of stairs.), two windows broken in my classroom, three desk broken, etc. Since LAST year.
Grades are almost always fluffed. Every F turns in a D. Too many D’s need to turn into C’s.
There‘s a phone policy that’s hardly enforced. It up to teachers to deal with it.
My mental health and anxiety has worsen since I started teaching 2 years ago. I’m leaving classroom teaching permanently after this year.
I just needed to rant. Couldn’t even make it to the 5-year mark and became a statistic. Have a nice rest of your day!
Thanks bush
Genuine question. I assumed you're talking about no child left behind. I know nothing about it. Can you summarize it?
I'm not an educator, but most of my family is and no child left behind is an interest of my sister who is a teacher, and it goes like this:
School funding is heavily driven by tax revenue of the surrounding areas, so more affluent districts could afford higher pay, more expensive materials, etc than a less wealthy district. This meant the quality of education varied wildly across state to state, city to city, district to district. The subjects taught and the full scope of each subject being taught was different as well. So you'd end up with entire groups of children not having been taught things needed to be a productive member of society
No Child Left Behind sought to correct this.
The idea was to create a standardized set of knowledge expectations across the US and used additional funding as a corrective function to underperforming schools. If a school was doing well by their students they got more money, if a school was not providing as good of an education, they'd lose money. Doing "well" was primarily measured by checking the students' knowledge of the listed standard topics.
In practice what happened was standardized test scores got mathematically tied school funding. Average grades, number of students graduated, a few other metrics also got tied mathematically to funding.
School districts could try their best, provide the best quality education possible, and then hope and pray that the students performed well... Or they could cook the books and change internal standards to ensure that by all the measured metrics they got the most funding they could
It also served to open up school districts to private interests for budget shortfalls.
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation for example gave huge sums of money to schools, but yhe money with stipulations and requirements from the schools. Worker training replaced the arts, etc.
So winner takes all, essentially. So low testing schools, which are generally more poor fall even further behind. Wow.
Also, this reminds me of Goodhart's law.
Goodhart's law is an adage that has been stated as, "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure".[1] It is named after British economist Charles Goodhart, who is credited with expressing the core idea of the adage in a 1975 article on monetary policy in the United Kingdom:[2]
Exactly
There were some strong criticisms of NCLB when it was first created that correctly predicted this would happen.
Another unintended consequence was the death of elective classes in all but the most affluent schools. Schools strapped for cash needed the extra money offered by NCLB so they diverted what little resources they had into classes that were measured through standardized testing. Shop, agriculture, civics, home economics, classes that actually helped students live a good life were axed in favor of more math and science since students generally performed lower in those subjects and were dragging scores, thereby funding, down
I would’ve read this if it were text but I’m not going to keep zooming in and out to read some screenshot on mobile.
Pictures of text get more engagement, for whatever reason. Also, it's evidence that I didn't just write it myself, or edit it, not great evidence, but some evidence.
ChatGPT doesn't need to be accurate if people are unable to think for themselves. This is all on track for the "intelligence as a utility" future the LLM wankers have in plan for us
Altman has intelligence if you have coin
I worked in a place where you had to have parent permission to fail students.
Also, “base-50” grading - all work, whether turned in or not, earns a 50.
Online school is really a ticking time bomb though. Even before AI, it was basically kids spending an afternoon googling crap and getting credit for a full semester of high school.
Working as intended.
The goal right now is not to produce future scientists, engineers, or the best and brightest.
the goal right now is to produce barely functional simpletons that can only just barely manage to survive on their own. the kind of people that don't question, don't think, don't analyze, who don't do anything but believe what they're told by people they view as an authority figure.
this is the end goal of decades of attacks on education.
America spends more per student than most other countries yet churns out the worst possible results.
Reminds me of the novel 'Wilt'. He is a teacher at a vocational school, and he has to convey the joys of English Literature to classes called 'Meat 1' and 'Bricklayers 2'. Attendence is mandatory, but the course is not scored. And most students are bigger, stronger, and butcher (pun intended) than he.
The whole idea of the American education system of teachers grading their own students and essentially being able to just arbitrarily decide passes or fails is completely wild.
Wait, who should be grading the students?
I assume he means it should be based on a rubric or some other marking scheme rather than something more subjective that can be arbitrarily shifted to meet quotas.
In the UK at least, students take a standardised exam, then the papers are collected and taken to other part of the country and teachers mark them blindly
Americans are Idiots.
This policy has been the same in France for the past 20 (maybe 30?) years. Little angels are not allowed to fail and I don't know why. The violent reaction from parents is identical and some teachers are scared.
That's just not true. Elementary school students only repeat a year in exceptional cases, because it has been scientifically proven that repeating a grade actually worsens performance at that age. They move up to the next grade, but their poor results are not swept under the rug. In middle and high school, however, repeating a year is certainly possible; I repeated a year in high school myself, and that wasn't thirty years ago. In middle school, you can fail the brevet exam. In a general high school track, you can be rejected or redirected to a technological high school, while students in a technological track can be sent to a vocational high school.
When I was in school, anything below 67% was failing, so that number on its own is a shocker. But, yeah, these young people are the future of their regions and countries and that seems like a very bad thing.

all 38 comments