all 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 45 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's just an excuse to create a "papers please" internet.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    I mean, we also have a lot of "papers please" in real life that no one has an issue with and actually serves a useful purpose. So the idea of extending this to the internet is logical and not necessarily a bad thing. It can actually provide something good. HOWEVER implemention is absolute key here, because it's easy to over reach and collect (and store) way more tha! actually required for simple age verification. Since current tendency among politicians (in all nations) unfortunately leans heavily towards over reaching, as usual we can't have proper things because the douchebags want to ruin it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    Actually many of us do have issues with the "real life" privacy issues but many may weight it and consider "age verification" (doxing your personal information when it reliably leaks) to be much worse. No matter the implimentation an illegal access or alternative serivce will be much safer.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Sadly I have little faith their proposal will be reasonable. It‘ll either be too soft or asking for unreasonable measures like broad identification and face IDs.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    Depends from country to country.

    Denmark for example have issued an age verification app, where no data other than "Allowed/Declined" is leaving the app.

    No specific age, no name, no data.

    The token is issued by the government.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 21 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    Hah, so they too prefer to police minors instead of companies.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago

    You mean everyone, not just minors.

    It's what this madness requires: everyone is a child until they can prove otherwise. To an age verification company that's existed for 2 weeks and definitely isn't lying or incompetent...

    And of course they do. Can't risk a CEO crying wolf and it being real for once. Think of "the economy".

    I hate this timeline. 😒

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    instead of curbing far right media.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    Like cigarettes, yeah it's worse for kids but it's not good for adults either. I'd rather see more restrictions placed in the companies making the toxic products than age verification based systems.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Curb it only on Thursdays?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    I would rather see them ban all content with minors. Why do kids have to upload anything on the internet? Let platforms enforce it on their end.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    This lady loves rules

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 month ago

    I have not looked into the sources myself but a Swedish podcsst called "Bli säker podden" that is about cybersecurity had an episode where they talked about this, and it was menetioned the age verification is for big corps with a certain amount of users only, which could mean we are getting a lot of people to the federated social media.

    Maybe with this knowledge we can do something about it and get more people away from Meta and Twitter platforms.

  • source
  • [–] [S] -4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    About time Europe treated addictive feeds like the product design problem they are. The real test is whether this becomes meaningful age appropriate access with privacy preserving checks, or just another glorious cookie banner where everyone clicks »I’m 18« and TikTok solemnly salutes.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago

    EU already has systems for verifying age and the provider sends no identifiable information to the website. While I find age verification problematic and annoying - where credit is due, they seem to have at least made it so that the citizen data is not being uploaded to US servers.

  • source
  • parent