New York City has released more than 170,000 pages of previously undisclosed records about air quality following the September 11, 2001, attacks, showing city officials at the time knew conditions around Ground Zero were unsafe to breathe despite repeated assurances to the public.

Mayor Zohran Mamdani announced the release at a news conference Tuesday.

“As the years pass and the human toll grows, we reckon with the cost of September 11th whenever another New Yorker is stolen from us too soon,” Mamdani said. “Now, close to 25 years later, more people have died from 9/11-related illnesses than were killed on the day itself.”

At least 140,000 people from all 50 states have enrolled in the World Trade Center Health Program, and 49,000 have been diagnosed with certified WTC-related cancers, according to the 9/11 Memorial. Mamdani said Tuesday that more people are eligible for assistance than are currently enrolled, including residents who lived near the site but have not received outreach and those who live outside of New York.

all 97 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 246 points 2 months ago (5 children)

“There was poison in the air, and on the ground, and in the window sills, and in your air conditioners and covering your pets and your clothes, and it stayed there for months. Everyone knew. Now it’s very clear that the city knew as well,” Stewart said.

Wait wait wait... no... so it ain't so Jon. Rudy Gulliani, Americas Mayor... is a lying piece of shit?!?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 147 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/general/rudy-giuliani-seeks-9-11-health-fund-coverage-as-lawyer-links-pneumonia-to-ground-zero-exposure/ar-AA22G8sg

    Rudy recently got sick and decided to claim '9/11 disease' benefits.

    Rudy hasn't been to one funeral for any of the Ground Zero heroes and rescuers who got sick working the Pit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Holy crap, that’s fucked up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago

    I just say that Trump is now claiming he was directing operations at Ground Zero on the day.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/trump-says-he-was-at-ground-zero-the-day-after-9-11-evidence-for-sept-12-remains-unverified/ar-AA2bL1Cw

    This is what he was actually doing on the day, calling into a radio show. No mention of being there.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/donald-trump-s-disgusting-9-11-brag-resurfaces-in-new-york-building-claim/ar-AA1MprEN

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 96 points 2 months ago (12 children)

    This guy is such a pro political operator.. In one action of exposing this lie he increases the trust in his gov, his own trustworthiness and he puts a lot of fuel in the Medicare-for-All fight which his comrades are fighting in his state and around the country.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (11 children)

    This guy is such a pro political operator

    That is such an incredibly cynical way of spinning it, even if it was meant to be a compliment.


    Edit: Folks, "political operator" is what you call people who are particularly manipulative, conniving, and in it only for themselves. People who "operate" the political machine, with all the bribery, corruption, retaliation, and other dirty tricks that implies. I don't care what the ignorant replies say; it is not a good thing!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    Or maybe you're extremely naïve.

    If you look at anyone who has actually made a change in the world, they did it by knowing the rules and knowing how to play the game.

    Getting mad at calling Mamdani a smart politician is like getting mad at MLK for choosing Rosa Parks for the bus boycott symbol instead of the first woman who refused to give up her seat.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claudette_Colvin

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago* (8 children)

    He didn't say "smart politician." He said "political operator" which has a distinctly more negative connotation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Since when does it have a negative connotation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Since forever. Search for it if you don't believe me, and count how many negative instances vs. positive instances you find in the results.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I did and the results showed it as just a basic term to describe an occupation in politics.

    None of the examples here have it as a pejorative:

    https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/political-operative

    Here's an Atlantic article about political operatives and what they do, nothing negative about the term per se:

    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/02/the-life-of-a-political-operative-explained/253130/

    Here's a blurb on Georgetown's site referring to a political operative as a regular job stream in politics:

    https://politics.georgetown.edu/get-involved2/advance-team/

    Here's a guy who's calling himself a political operative just fine:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/2t2sxk/iama_political_operative_ama/

    So where did you get the idea that being called a political operative is a negative thing?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    None of the examples here have it as a pejorative:

    https://www.collinsdictionary.com/us/dictionary/english/political-operative

    WTF? Since when are these not negative?

    As well as ending his party's decade in the political wilderness, it cemented his reputation as a no-holds-barred political operative.


    Globe and Mail

    Are you going to argue that "no-holds-barred" -- as in, fighting dirty -- isn't negative?

    But when a police chief crosses that line and becomes a political operative, the system provides little control and no remedy.


    Times, Sunday Times

    Are you going to argue that the system providing little control and no remedy isn't a bad thing?

    The other three examples are too out-of-context to know if they were complimentary or derogatory.


    Here’s an Atlantic article about political operatives and what they do, nothing negative about the term per se:

    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/02/the-life-of-a-political-operative-explained/253130/

    The article is mostly paywalled, but here's a salient sentence from the first paragraph where it admits I'm right:

    It's good for a chuckle, although it's wishful thinking to believe the public imagines political operatives and staffers to be like The West Wing. They've probably got a bleaker impression than that...


    The other two things you cited are from self-described "political operatives" themselves, and of course nobody believes themself to be the villain!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*

    Are you going to argue that “no-holds-barred” – as in, fighting dirty – isn’t negative?

    No, I'm going to argue that "no-holds-barred" is not "political operative" and that adjectives modify nouns. If you see the phrase "evil dog", are you going to assume that must mean all dogs are evil?

    I'd also argue that you're wrong about what "no-holds-barred" means too. After all, this is actually from an article championing the person in question. You misread a compliment for an insult because you're operating on the preconceived notion that both "no-holds-barred" and "political operative" are negative terms when neither are.

    Are you going to argue that the system providing little control and no remedy isn’t a bad thing?

    No, I'm going to argue that this question has nothing to do with showing that "political operative" is a pejorative term.

    The other three examples are too out-of-context to know if they were complimentary or derogatory.

    That didn't stop you from trying to argue about these two above, when you believed that arguing about them out of context was in your favour. The other examples are just more inconvenient to try to twist into somehow showing "political operative" is a pejorative. And, as we've seen, context is not friendly to your assumption.

    The article is mostly paywalled, but here’s a salient sentence from the first paragraph where it admits I’m right:

    How do you go from "it’s wishful thinking to believe the public imagines political operatives and staffers to be like The West Wing" to "political operative is an insulting way to refer to political staffers or politicians"? This isn't even getting into how the term is clearly and explicitly used in the headline in a way that indicates it as a neutral term that just describes a job, and that it will be used that way throughout the article.

    The other two things you cited are from self-described “political operatives” themselves, and of course nobody believes themself to be the villain!

    People aren't going to refer to their jobs in a pejorative way either. Did you forget that you were trying to say calling someone a "smart politician" is better than calling someone a "political operative"? You weren't saying all politicians are bad so nobody would ever admit they were one.

    Again, where are you getting the idea that "political operator" is a term with a negative connotation?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Are you going to argue that "no-holds-barred" -- as in, fighting dirty -- isn't negative?

    No-holds-barred is about the rules of engagement, not an individual's fighting technique. If anything it's even more positive because it means they can hold their own against people who do fight dirty.

    Are you going to argue that the system providing little control and no remedy isn't a bad thing?

    It's only that way because it's the police chief who crossed the line. That's a specific instance of the combination of "police chief" and "political operative" where the system provides little control and no remedy.

    It's good for a chuckle, although it's wishful thinking to believe the public imagines political operatives and staffers to be like The West Wing. They've probably got a bleaker impression than that..

    You might as well say "lawyer" is negative because people have bleak impressions of them. Should those on our side avoid studying law because people will think negatively of them? No, obviously, studying law is crucial to the drafting of policy that benefits people.

    Likewise, understanding politics and being effective at operating in the political sphere is crucial to actually making things better.

    Your argument is bad and you should feel bad. We want skilled political operatives on our side. If you want to whisper your political dreams into a shoebox and make an inoffensive manifestation board, then bug off and do that. The rest of us actually want to accomplish something, and that requires political savvy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Yeah, better words could have been chosen for sure 😄

    He IS really good at his two jobs (governing to benefit the people and winning over hearts and minds), though, which is fucking GREAT!

    Usually only far right ghouls, ideology-challenged "centrists" and other people on the wrong side of history are extremely skilled at the strategic parts.

    It's fucking great to have a politician with progressive goals and policies who's not just skilled enough to avoid the duopoly propaganda machine burying him (which is already better than 99% of progressive politicians), but actually succeeds in dominating the narrative himself WITHOUT having to stoop to their level by feeding the people lies and convenient omissions of important information!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 87 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

    I cannot imagine any DNC Approved™ mayor doing this. Instead they'd continue to protect their GOP counterparts exactly as the last two Democratic mayors have done.

    The best part is that's the end of Guiliani's criticism of Mamdani. I bet his ears are ringing from that smackdown.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I'm surprised Giuliani even gets mentioned any more. The last vestiges of his credibility ran down his face at the whole Four Seasons Total Landscaping debacle, and the least said about the Borat thing the better...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 70 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    My dad's best friend just died of 9/11-related COPD. He worked in an office building around the corner from the WTC and was told to keep coming to work. He suffered greatly for many years.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago

    Sounds like there needs to be a lawsuit.

    Not that it will bring any peace to your dad’s friend/family, but to hold these people accountable. If they aren’t held responsible it’ll just happen again to the next shmuck.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago

    Thanks for the comment. This really provided some needed framing. My initial reaction to this was, "oh well, what was there to be done? Those first few days and weeks were utter chaos. There were an unknown number of people still alive under the rubble with limited time to get them out. Immediate deaths vs long term deaths, what could have really been done? Ultimately the people are responsible are the ones that took down the towers."

    But your comment really reframed things for me. I was thinking of this only from the perspective of rescue workers. And I imagine if they had told the actual first responders about the risk and air quality, most of them would have shrugged, said, "I don't care, I'm here to save lives," and took the risk willingly. But there are two issues with this. First, even if the first responders would still willingly take the risk, more efforts could have been taken to provide more and better PPE for the rescuers. Second, a lot of people didn't actually need to be anywhere near ground zero. All of the office buildings within a dangerous distance should have been evacuated. Companies still need to keep operating, but alternate arrangements could have been made. This was before the era that WFH was really possible for most office workers, but we still could have found a way. For example, we could have set up cubicles on the floors of sports arenas, using them as temporary offices like we use them as temporary shelters during natural disasters. Hell, with all of the money flying around post 9/11, simply writing checks to cover the salaries of everyone under a mandatory office evacuation for a few months would have been a rounding error compared to the hundreds of billions dedicated to defense and military expansion.

    Wikipedia suggests 400,000 people were exposed to the dust of 9/11. Let's say this is an underestimate and let's make it a clean million. Let's make a generous assumption and assume those million people were earning on average $50,000 in 2001 dollars, slightly less than the equivalent of $100k today. Let's say we would need to evacuate them for three months while things settle out of the air, the rain washes every surface, and we cleaned, decontaminated, and contained the pollutants. That comes to $12,500 per person, and a total of $12.5 billion. We spent trillions in the post-9/11 years.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 56 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    So... Are we arresting Rudy Guiliani or are we not? Come on already put that walking corpse in the tombs before liver failure does it for us.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 110 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    It makes me so incredibly happy that he released this info, but I can totally understand why every single administration before him continued the coverup on this. The legal shitstorm that this will unleash...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 68 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Its one of the worst parts of electing dodgy officials, if later admins tidy up their mess they end up taking the rap themselves while the culprits have no consequences. Imagine the mountain of litigation from abuse of power by the trump admin, but they won't be accountable for it themselves

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, exactly. It takes real courage to do what Mamdani did; despite the fact that he's the one who pulled back the veil on this thing, he's going to be remembered as the mayor who cost NYC a shit load of money. It's very likely that no negative consequences are going to befall anybody who covered this shit up (well, maybe for Giuliani, but it'll probably be post-mortem, or at least too late to make any difference). But every other mayor and elected official between then and now is going to skate. But Mamdani will be tarnished by it. It's so fucked up and backwards. All of the previous admin officials will essentially be rewarded for being cowards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    I think he's able to take this hit thanks to the goodwill he has built up already, and this choice will be rewarded by his electorate. Political capital is made to be spent.

    The only people who will mentally put this down as 'cost NYC a lot of money' are already lost causes who are only looking for ways to harm him. If it wasn't this, they would invent something else a la tan suit.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 51 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Funny, transparent government at the CITY level, semi-transparent government at the STATE level, and no-transparent government at the FEDERAL level.

    The more power they have, the less they want you to know what they are doing.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Deeper water where the bigger fish live

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Sharks don't "infest" waters, they LIVE there.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 2 months ago

    I’m sure the city hid this so they wouldn’t have to deal with the costs, but this is the right thing to do and I’m impressed Mamdani did it.

  • source
  • [–] 35 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    You know, it was a really horrible day, but in the end it was what it was. The air was poison, and I don't think the first responders would have not gone in, they're heros. But the fact that so many of them had some form of cancer or some varient after that, you couldn't even not lie so they can get free medical treatment they more than deserve is fucking garbage.

    They need to jail every single person who touched that report. Period.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    The fact that Jon Stewart of all people has been the one to advocate for first responders on 9/11 to get the care they need is an absolute abomination to whoever was in charge during the events.

    A TV personality should not be standing in front of Congress to tell them to help firefighters who assisted during 9/11 that they should get healthcare.

    People think the USA is a joke because of Trump. It's been a fucking clown show for well over two decades. If not more. Your country is an international embarrassment on unprecedented levels.

    Superpower my ass.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 34 points 2 months ago*

    That's what you get for posturing like a jackass about not inviting a Muslim city official to 9-11 remembrance events. Good for NYC they finally have someone with balls.

  • source
  • [–] 32 points 2 months ago

    A friend broke this story to me saying "Mamdani just revealed a 25 year old 9/11 government conspiracy!" which is wildly misleading, lol.

    But I'm happy there's finally a mayor willing to tackle this; I've been aware of Jon Stewart's work on this issue regarding first responders for decades because of his show, but it's nice that with acknowledgement, there might be some help for the families suffering.

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Speaking of NYC and releasing files, Epstein lived there, they should release the NYC Epstein files and dare the feds to charge them with a crime for it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago

    Considering that Rudy Giuliani was the mayor at the time, this does not surprise me at all.

  • source
  • [–] 59 points 2 months ago (12 children)
  • [–] 48 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    I mean, how could you not draw that conclusion? An uncontrolled demolition of a 30+ year old building that most likely contained materials that would not be allowed now, coupled with all the items stored in them as well as the jet itself.

    To think that “things are fine” right after would be just plain delusional.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    All we needed to know is that the twin towers were built using asbestos. It was standard in construction materials at the time they were erected.

    I was a preteen living near (but not in) NYC on 9/11/01. I remember the fine layer of dust that covered everything for days after.

    You know how your car gets covered in pollen every spring? It was like that every morning, except instead of yellow pollen, it was white/gray mystery ash.

    Now I'm wondering if this is something I should mention to a medical professional.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    I lived down the street from the WTC pit for a few years in college, I remember that high-up surfaces like ledges above subway stairs and awnings above storefronts that were protected from rains often still had a thick layer of white-ish dust on them and it was always so eerie to realize that probably a majority of it was from 9/11, probably a certain amount of pulverized human bone in there...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Have to change screen names now that you are sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 months ago (23 children)

    I'd like to vote for amending the Constitution so that non-US-born citizens can become president so he can run for office.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Then you’d get Musk and the rest running, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I get it, but i honestly think that a big reason the establishment didn't come at him harder was that he wasn't a threat to most establishment careers.

    If he'd have been US-born, i think they'd have put more effort into coming for his reputation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    The DNC running a whole ass 3rd party spoiler candidate wasn't coming for him?

    Replace First-past-the-post voting, let the people vote how they want. Tired of these cowards gatekeeping us from having real options.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    "More effort" isn't "didn't come for him"

    Think about how much airtime national news outlets have been giving to El Sayed being friends with Hasan Piker, vs those dumb placards that Nepo baby running against Mamdani had (i forget the name).

    Probably tens of millions of dollars in just anchor-person salary spent on talking nonsense on El Sayed and his ethnicity, vs making a poster with skin and beard darkening (of Zohran).

    Honestly i thought they'd just be waiting, sharpening their knives so they could just tie up everything he tried to do as Mayor and then use him as an example of the failures of socialism.

    But yeah all quiet on that front so far.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    I second this, if Trump can wipe his ass with the constitution then fuck it throw it out it worthless. He runs for president I donate, knock doors get as many signatures required to get him elected as president.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Regardless of Trump, I don't see the big deal with being born in the US. Mamdani is doing amazing things for NYC. Why is that okay but not the nation itself?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    It all boils down to a paranoia that happened early on that a prez might give USA back to the British

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Honestly, probably just security clearance. We already don’t let people who are a citizen of another nation have access to certain info or industry.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Yeah that only applies to non-oligarchs. Elon Musk has and has direct control of vital US military assets for which he can turn on and off at a whim which he did to AID RUSSIA...during Biden's administration. I remember some reporter asked about revoking his clearance and nationalising those assets and they were just like "naaah we ain't doing that." They acted as if Musk was exercising his sacred god given rights when he cut those drones of and how dare we puny creatures question those rights.

    And Netanyahu, a foreign head of state can apparently just come and go as he pleases when it comes to "top secret" war rooms.

    So yeah it's a joke. Security clearances, treason charges, those are for little people.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    We can't even get a woman elected you think an immigrant would ever have a chance?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago

    Yes.

    If we've learned anything from Trump, it's that a president doesn't need to fit a specific mould. He's a billionaire from NYC, yet look at his core supporters. If a wealthy orange pedo from NYC can get the rural Alabama vote, Mamdani could get any vote

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Hillary and Kamala both ran dogshit campaigns. They didn't lose because Americans are sexist (not that that helped). They lost because they wasted their money on tv adds and had fuck all ground game, they had a shitty platform that appealed to no one, and because the DNC sabotaged better candidates.

    So yes, I do think an immigrant with charisma and a platform and a modern campaign strategy would win.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    They also lost because they are corporate Democrats and people are seeing the game.

    No real punishments issued to any Republicans from Democrats

    No "fight" in them, they always lose on some technicality

    Kamala will laugh and joke and touch elbows with the lowest of pedophile protectors when she thinks she is not on camera.

    Every chance they get to fight MAGA with the progressive left, they choose to attack the LEFT

    Hakeem Jeffries just had a secret meeting with Jared Kushner to discuss, in Hakeem's "view", affordability.

    Biden appointed a pedophile party member to "punish" the alpha pedophile for a COUP, AND THEY WOULDNT DO IT

    HOW MANY SPECIAL PROSECUTORS HAVE WE HAD THAT LED TO NOTHING?

    HOW MANY CORPORATE DEMOCRATS ARE ACTUALLY JUST PAID FOREIGN AGENTS OF THE GOVERNMENT THAT IS OCCUPYING US?

    THIS MAKES THEM PEDOPHILE PROTECTONG TRAITORS AND WE ALL KNOW WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN TO PEDOPHILIC TRAITORS

    NOTHING IS GOING TO CHANGE WITH THE ISRAELIS AND CORPORATIONS IN CHARGE OF EVERYTHING.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Just say you support Republicans already and fuck off

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • Imagine if the health data wasn't silenced so the banks could keep on for closing - there would be 49000 people not dying of cancer.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    People trying to ban him from the ceremony.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    "Officials"

    Giuliani

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Got a better source btw?

    I know it's real, I just think CNN suck

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    for one, british newspapers on average suck more

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    They all suck, but USA ones suck most

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (2 children)

    what do you use?

    two out of the big five uk newspapers are anti-trans, and the third is a neoliberal financial paper. i’d say us media is generally better

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 month ago* (1 child)

    6/8 USA newspapers are owned by Murdoch and love sucking billionaire cock.

    Al Jazeera are pretty great for world news, but with an obvious bias towards the Middle East, BBC are hit and miss, but they are legally required (the only one that is) to be neutral, but it's also that every case of none-neutral has to go to a tribunal, so some gets missed (and the tribunal has a TERFy bias)

    I'll be honest I just don't trust USA news cause your "left" looks like centrist compared to our left

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Where are you getting the number six from? He's only got the WSJ. Including tabloids he does have NYP, but the UK doubles the trouble on that front with both Daily Mail and The Sun. The US has got the New York Times, The Hill. And the US has got tons of amazing news magazines to show for it: New Yorker, Press Gazette, Reason, (and recently Newsweek got good,) plus the left Jacobin and Mother Jones. The UK has, as far as I'm aware, Spectator. There's also online news like Wired, 404media, Vox. CNN is as good as the BBC though that might change soon, but we still have tons like CNN like NBC. (The US has also got the AP but I'll let this one slide since the UK has got Reuters.)

    News is news. Tell me which newspaper other than maybe The Guardian is your left in the UK.

  • source
  • parent
  • 2 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 22 points 2 months ago

    Jon Stewart

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    The fact that these criminals are out there walking free, and not spending their lives in prison, should remind you that America is a corporate dictatorship run by thieves and criminals. There weren't whistleblowers. Just numerous layers of corruption protecting the criminals. A comedian had to spend thousands of hours of his life just to get the victims support and healthcare ffs.

  • source