Isn´t Pinterest the site nobody visits anymore because it's overrun with AI slop? I think it's dead.
post
Nice to know that I was unknowingly contributing to AI training every time I saved an image I appreciated back in the 2010s, too. At least I put the wrong birth date on my account, I think.
I’m no longer surprised by this shit, but I’m never any less angry. Fuck these people.
Why would a row be more than one pin? That's not how computering works.
And yeah, when you give a company license to do whatever they want with your data, "whatever they want" includes AI.
I mean, fuck Pinterest, but this isn't news.
I think people see the word "row" is being interpreted as a horizontal line of content on a feed page because they don't know the computing definition of "data record"
And yeah, when you give a company license to do whatever they want with your data, “whatever they want” includes AI.
I think an important point is that with the decline of Pinterest's popularity, most of their data was probably acquired many years before genAI became mainstream. (Like I think I only used it around 2008-2010.) So most users probably never imagined their data could be used for training like this in the future.
In data analytics you sometimes see some weird datasets spanning across a whole lot of columns with what would be otherwise normalised in different records with relations instead.
Shit can be weird in data…
A row is just an entry in a database, I have no idea why you would assume each one represents 4-6. It's already bad enough, you don't need to misinform to make it appear worse, you'll only lose credibility.
If they were publicly available pins, and users agreed to the license that gave them permission to use their data, then they can do that.
I think the broader issue is people being acclimated to permissive licenses, and not having privacy as a default
¹ "ROWS" probably means database rows/records. Therefore I would assume one row = 1📍.
Yeah, it's not even capitalized in the source article, so OP just invented a new unit to be 4-6x more outraged, lol.
Unless it refers to the famous Really Outrageously Wide Stack, usually representing stacks of 16386 records each. Omg, it's over 8 TRILLION pins!
In short, Pinterest sucks and OP enjoys clickbait writing style. Avoiding both is probably the best way forward.
Yeah, but if we assume that one row means 50 csam images, it sounds even more outrageous.
Being reasonable never got anyone any clicks.
Well pins are usually organized in rows of 4-6, when displayed on Pinterest and in a database each row could have a different type of data, therefore it really isn't that clear to me.
This post has triggered my outrage!
...because this is totally normal database stuff. Like, where's the meat? My phone could handle 500 million rows of data. Is that supposed to be a lot?
I'm not exaggerating about the phone part: A modern smartphone can handle an SQLite DB with billions of records (aka "ROWS", LOL).
So basically they’re admitting that they’re even breaking the copyright law? Man, there is just so much wrong with this. I knew Pinterest was bad, but I didn’t think it was that bad. Shame on Pinterest.
Hopefully it made the AI learn the difference between "it’s" and "its"
Pinterest's whole model is locking other people's content behind the walls of its own platform. It should've been illegal from the start.
could 1 mean row in the DB sense here which presumably would be 1:1 with Pins?
all 11 comments