top 39 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 59 points 2 months ago (18 children)

Why 40%? The value of his labor that's being redirected to the pockets of wealthy CEOs is much higher than that.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (13 children)

    Because it said pay and not value?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 2 months ago (12 children)
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    Woosh indeed. Mind explaining the punchline?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    I'm well aware of what OP's intent was. My comment was highlighting the inherent absurdity of complaining about taxes, which are by no definition "theft" and which are actually used to enrich your fellow man (no, I don't need to hear about military spending or whatever other government outlay you personally object to; even in the US there are still tax funded programs that benefit the average person, despite the Republicans best efforts), rather than directing your anger at the far greater amount of our productivity that is literally stolen from us by the super wealthy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] -4 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    Taxes are not "used to enrich your fellow man". They are used to limit the amount of money in circulation. A financially sovereign state can issue however much money it wants - money is not a limited resource for such a state.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Do you know what happens to countries and economies that just "print more money"?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)

    Yes (which depends on the way an economy is organised, by the way). But that just means that there are factors that influence how much currency a financially sovereign state wants to issue, rather than that they can't issue that currency.

    Again, what actually can be used for improving the conditions of one's fellow workers are budgets dedicated to relevant policies, rather than taxes that simply reduce the amount of money in circulation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

    I think you're arguing in favor of some other philosophy and not disagreeing with their central point. It's implied that the tax revenue is spent on nice things, not that the taxes themselves are the benefit. They're not talking about inflation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    Saying "tax revenue is spent on..." is misleading. Taxes are used to take currency out of circulation (roughly speaking, destroy the currency). A financially sovereign state can issue however much money it wants, i.e. it can form whatever budgets it wants. Money is not a limited resource for them. The fact that it will not want arbitrary budgets is a different manner.

    They’re not talking about inflation.

    I covered a more broad case than inflation, but if they were not talking about it, then their comment makes no sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    It sounds like you're proselytizing MMT

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    I am not. That's just how states literally work.

    If you think that financially sovereign states have some limited supply and can run out of money, you are welcome to explain what would prevent them from simply issuing more money in that situation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 9 points 2 months ago*

    lmao

    hits even worse on a tuesday

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    "child eating pedophiles" and child-eating pedophiles are two entirely opposite things. Hyphens matter.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    your average american can't read past elementary school but here you are with your pedantic nerd bullshit to act like details matter.

    critique by grammer.. i dare you.

    want more capitalizations? want me to spell grammar properly?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    55 hour work week? Over ten hours a day? What the actual fuck?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I mean technically, if you commute 90 minutes in a direction per day, along with a five-day 40-hour week, you spend 55 hours on work a week

    And while 90 minutes may be far fetched in most parts of europe hopefully, I kind of suspect it isn't in the land of the free

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago*

    I kind of suspect it isn't in the land of the free

    Dude I once worked two jobs on alternating days of the week on cities 45 miles in opposite directions. You have no idea how embarrassing it is to drive to work and then realize you're in the wrong parking lot when you get to work after a 90 minute drive because traffic sucks.

    Dammit now I need some fried food

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago*

    i knew someone in CC that did 12hr/day for 5-6days a long time ago. not surprised he burned out of his major, and switched to a more "chill major", because your own job overtook your time from studying. never try to do full time work, while full time student, you just end doing really bad on most of your classes. the rent at the time was pretty reasonable for and lucky he even found one at a HCOL like under 1000/mon rent at the time. he was trying to save for an expensive grad school in the future, but had a "eiphany' and 180 his career choices, to a 'Easier" but questionable job market job(degree)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Who the fuck wears a hard hat hi viz in their lounge?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 months ago

    Hey now they aren't child eating... That's the controled opposition...

  • source