roger roger (media.piefed.social)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/memes@lemmy.world
🀣 3
 
roger roger

top 100 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 94 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

It is just a concept right now. It has not yet delivered any live births.

"Despite optimism, experts state that the technology is still far from full implementation." https://thaitimes.com/a-robot-to-give-birth-the-chinese-announcement-that-shakes-the-world

The same proposed robot went viral in 2025 but was entirely fake: https://www.livescience.com/health/fertility-pregnancy-birth/pregnancy-robot-from-china-is-fake-but-is-the-technology-behind-it-possible

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 2 months ago
    [–] 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 35 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    If you had told me 30 years ago that China would be "Brave New World" and the US would be "1984" I would have thought that you got it backwards.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    30 years, yes, but for the past 15 or so it's been clear that China is pulling way ahead in every metric. I think home ownership has been in the 90s% for a long time. Likewise, the fall of the American empire started with Reagan, it was clear where this train was headed, capitalism will always end in fascism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago*

    The Hallmark of the Maoist Revolution was guaranting every citizen owned the land they lived on.

    Also what kicked off the Tianamen Square riots. Deng's privatization reforms went against the Maoist principles of public ownership, in pursuit of a modern urban industrial model. And the public backlash erupted into street fighting in the capital that killed tens of thousands of people.

    Likewise, the fall of the American empire started with Reagan

    A bit early to close the book on American Empire. It took over a century for the UK to come off it's Victorian Era peak. Along the way, they created modern computers and jet engines, which they used to commit multiple genocides.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 29 points 2 months ago
    [–] 27 points 2 months ago

    "His mom is a Kranger!"

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 66 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    Why the fuck does it have to have a robot body?

    What's the point? Just make an artificial womb and be done with it.

    Just tacking on dog shit robotics just means it's needlessly complex and has more fault areas.

    More dumbass tech shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    The answer is: gen AI slop.

    However, the obsession with bi-pedal robots is creepy and weird.

    I watched someone on YouTube talking about it but can't remember the channel.

    Basically, there is no single task for which bipedal is the best format, it's only suitable for the range of tasks humans can perform. However, we just don't have the tech to make that format viable. As in, they can't do the dishes or clean the bathroom or take out the trash.

    Demonstrations of bots doing those things are in tightly controlled environments with loads of programmed parameters.

    Its appealing because everyone wants a humanoid to order around, but that's about it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -17 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    The obsession with bipedal robots is great. It fulfills the urge to reproduce without having to reproduce. So once we have those, we can stop having children and end this stupid species.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Oh it can give birth to live babies now! That's definitely a step up!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 months ago* (12 children)

    I don't claim to be an expert on the endocrine system. But I know enough to know it's the most complicated system in the body. Possibly more complicated than the brain (my area of expertise).

    And only recently did scientists figure out how to high jack the endocrine system for weight loss and not without plenty of side effects.

    So in order for a baby to come to term, it must be exposed to different hormones , at different levels, at different times that come from the mother.

    We can't produce all of those hormones. We can't even currently determine all of hormone needs of a fetus. So there is no way to meet these needs. Not to mention the protein needs. Again, many of which are made by the mother. And can't be synthetic.

    We can grow an embryo in a container for quite a while. weeks. Maybe even a few months.

    Sure, you can attach it to a roomba with temperature control.

    But that's not the same as being able to grow a baby to term.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    All these related AI claims like "AI will cure cancer" or anything related to AI solving otherwise unsolved scientific problems are always hilarious. Curing cancer or any other disease requires us to fully understand the biological mechanisms of the disease enough to then even attempt to affect it with a drug.

    AI learns and does its thing via input data from human knowledge and our current understanding. How can AI possibly gain an understanding of the disease mechanism or biological/biochemical system beyond that which humans understand? Not to mention it can't perform any sort of experiments to even test an idea.

    Sure I can appreciate it speeding up certain analyses that are otherwise tedious to do ourselves, but it's never going to spit out some magic bullet cure

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    Agree. And also. Scientists have been using and running statistical software analysis since like the late 70s. Everyone acts like we don't have tried and true methods already.

    Some machine learning might be useful though in research but idk if it's fair to call it "ai". Idk it depends on your definition.

    Actually in the research I do, I was looking into papers that measured a lot more variables than what is commonly done. (Usually two things are compared) And the authors used a formula to determine interactive effects based on which factors aligned or didn't align and by how much.

    This type of statistics is close to how ai works as it gives "weights" to different inputs.

    But this was a method the authors came up with and they fully disclosed how it worked and acknowledged it was only one of many approaches to determining these interactive effects.


    The research I'm referring to was about vision. Accommodation and vergence. Which function together. And you can manipulate them so they don't match and see which one has a stronger influence on the perception of depth. However, many other factors effect depth perception. But it's nearly impossible to study how these each contribute when multiples other factors are present. Some matching the true depth. Some giving an incorrect cue. Which cue, when wrong, overrides the correct one? If two matching cure are present, is there one cue that's wrong, but has a stronger impact on the perception ?

    These things are difficult to determine without literally thousands of studies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    The complete lack of a moral compass and legal ramifications displayed so far by the techbros might give them a very small advantage. But that shit always ends up being nothing more then useless torture in the end with little in the way of results.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago*

    Absolutely.

    The thing a lot of people don't understand about unethical science is that it's almost always shit science to boot.

    For example I hear people say that "sure, what the Nazis scientist did to Jews was awful but we learned so much".

    No we didn't.

    The only thing that research was good for was determining how long it took for a starved stressed person to die from a specific infliction like hypothermia. Or having limbs cut off. Or having poisons injected into them.

    That's literally the only thing gained and because the test subjects themselves were already in poor condition, we can't even use that information to determine, for instance, how long a healthy person could survive with said inflictions.

    Their shit ethics is also shit science.

    It's worthless.

    All those Nazi scientist who got a free get-out-of-jail card and set up in the U.S were shit scientist. They never gave the world anything useful.

    Much like the research musk's neurolink does.

    They dont get published papers because it's unethical and shit science.

    Nothing useful comes from mass maiming and torturing of animals. Neurolink.... I don't even want to get into why it has so many methodology flaws. But it's not being done properly.

    Shit ethics is always shit science too.

    People think letting these tech bros cross ethical restrictions will result in faster tech advances, they are sorely mistaken.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Chinese propaganda slop. Nothing substantial to see here. I don't even know why this is not immediately deleted by mods.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    We can, in fact, produce all those hormones.

    I don't disagree with your overall point, we aren't close to roboreproduction and it will take decades of incredibly unethical experiments to change that.

    But we as a species are really really good at organic chemistry. We can make anything out of carbon and friends that God can, and many things they can't.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    No, we are not capable of manufacturing all the hormones or even most of them.

    There are literally already a hundred that have been identified. But we haven't discovered all of them. New ones are being discovered all the time

    Many therapeutic drugs that are hormones are made in animals because we can't synthetically manufacture them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 20 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Why yes women having to carry pregnancies for nine months and then having to go through the pains of giving birth is a good thing we should not relieve them of that burden even when technology allows that thank you for asking.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    Bet the price will be absolutely prohibitive, letting only the rich use them.

    Bet it will be used to shield the rich from the consequences of failing medical systems.

    I'm not saying it's a bad technology, I'm saying it's being developed by the time, money, and effort, and for the benefit of parasites, assuming it's not just marketing for a cash-grab startup.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Well, at least they will be bad at shooting and probably dress in all white armor.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    Correct. The Clone Troopers were clones, which in the prequel movies is very clearly pointed out, but by the time of Episode IV: A New Hope the Empire had been recruiting from the general population. Much like most wars which drag on for a while, the elite forces end up having to let in new recruits to fill in gaps from those who were lost. These recruits might not have more than just some basic training, and when rebels then infiltrate weapons manufacturing plants and fiddle with the quality of the guns provided to these troops (IIRC mentioned in Andor if not elsewhere), it's no wonder the Storm Troopers had worse aim than the Clone Troopers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    It's explicitly stated in A New Hope that they were shooting to miss when the main characters were escaping the Death Star because a tracker had been planted on the Millennium Falcon and they planned to follow it and destroy whichever planet was hosting the rebel base. You can't do that if you don't let them escape. Every other time they're in battle, stormtroopers are shown to be devastatingly effective except when a small garrison is overwhelmed by a vasty larger number of ewoks.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    The first ones were the clone left over from the GAR after the Empire "paid off" the clone army and started replacing them with citizens. Hell, the Empire used a inferior type of clones for years after the destruction of the Kaminoian facilities.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    This is an important step for mechaphiles with mpreg fetishes.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    Finally, I can clone a Duncan!

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    The same fear that people had for IVF pregnancies. No one can tell by looking how you were born (unless your head got stuck in that cone shape if you had to be yanked out by suction)

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago

    This is a promising way to end surrogacy abuse in the 3rd world. I hope that future is realized.

  • source
  • I’m pretty sure this is the beginning of the movie Soldier (1998), starring Kurt Russel.

  • source
  • So... We're not getting the Terminator apocalypse? It's going to be The Matrix apocalypse after all?

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago (20 children)

    Cool, now we can make orphans with technology!

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (18 children)

    Or, you know, not put mothers through the painful, dangerous, and potentially lethal ordeal known as pregnancy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Okay, but this is Chinese technology, so it can only be used for evil

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago* (14 children)

    Ah yes, break the bonds that bind family and ultimately society together to "protect women". It is only lethal in places with shitty medical car....okay I see where you are going with this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago* (13 children)

    break the bonds that bind family

    Nine months in utero counts for more than your first 18 years of life?

    I'll need to break my adopted brother the terrible news

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    There is a lot that happens in utero. Sharing the mother's immune system, learning the voice of the mother and people around them, not to mention the various hormonal changes that prepare the mother physically and psychologically to care for an infant.

    Pregnancy can be dangerous but we really need to be careful whenever we introduce new medical technology.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -6 points 2 months ago* (10 children)

    Sorry to break reality to you and him.

    Also, we are talking about an artificial womb so you wouldn't have a mother.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (7 children)

    Do you not realize that an artificial womb still uses a fertilized human egg? Like, genetically, there's still two human parents.

    It's not like someone is going to fuck a robot and get it pregnant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (6 children)

    Your mother gives birth to you. She doesn't just donate genetic material. She carries you inside her for 9 months before pushing you out and holding you as you take your first breathe. This is the way it has been for millions of years.

    What people are proposing is breaking that human cycle. Eliminating the investment of time body and soul into the next generation. Pretending this wouldn't have significant impacts on our society is farcical. Population could literally be controlled by whoever has the money.

    We would also likely end up in a Gattaca situation because who would want to spend the money on a defective baby. Crispr babies raised by the government or corporations doesn't sound like a future I would look forward to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    So by your logic, fatherhood isn't real. Only motherhood is real.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    I am talking about the implications of creating humans unethically in ways that would upend society as we know it.

    Denying our strong familial bounds due to pregnancy and raising our biological offspring is silly. I am not saying fatherhood isn't real or that people can't adopt.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Why is a family deciding to use a robotic womb "unethical"? What's the difference between a robot surrogate and a human one?

    You seem to be thinking they're just going to pop out babies into the orphan factory and raise them like spare parts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    What family would get to use a robotic womb!? This type of technology would be reserved for the wealthy. The wealthy would likely create a genetically altered human baby to be super smart and resistant to disease.

    How many humans are you comfortable killing to develop this technology? How many more humans get to suffer being created as orphans without a real family.

    What I think is irrelevant. What the market will demand when we can create human life with the flip of a swotch will be another thing. Creating super soldiers, organ donors, human lab experiments, creating a slave caste, etc. will definitely be on the table.

    If you haven't thought of these implications that is on you boo.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    are you just pretending adoption doesnt happen or what? or caesarians, surrogate mothership or testtube babies? Or are you speculating without any evidence that just being born like this would instil irriversible lifelong trauma? Speficially what about this do you think will crash society besides vague personal feelings of ick?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Did I say adoption didn't happen. No.

    How does cesarian section have anything to do with artificial wombs!? It doesn't.

    Is a surrogate anything like a test tube baby that no longer requires a human to give up their bodily autonomy to make. No.

    Would be being born from a test tube in our current society be traumatic. Most likely.

    Who will be able to have test tube babies. Not the poor!

    What if someone decides to make a clone of themselves to harvest organs. Likely scenario.

    What if someone gets your genetic material and makes a baby without your permission. Ethical issues abound.

    How many human lives will be lost trying to perfect this technology. Countless.

    Why doesn't this idea give you the ick? You are incredibly naive.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    If even a grain of what you said was true, people wouldn't adopt. Birth doesn't bind a family together. Love and work are what bind a family together.

    If it was like you said we wouldn't have parents who starve their kids.

    You're a yucky person.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Lovely how they went from having a one-child policy to having ∞-child capabilities in just a few decades.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    There is zero chance that manufactured wombs would be as plentiful and cheap as the wombs of billions of women that already exist on the forseeable future.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    True, just like the fact that the plentiful and cheap humans are a finite source of wombs, while once you grow a bunch of babies with the robot womb you get enough eggs and semen to make more babies so that source is a bigger infinite.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    Finally we have created the Torment Nexus…

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    eh.. I see the taunts much more likely being "his dad's a techbro"

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Ah yes, the backstory to Raised By Wolves.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago*

    Does it have GPU datacenters? No?
    Then not clanker.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Wasn't this a thing in both the matrix and dune?

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Aside from the obvious technological barriers to achieve this, are they going to turn them into soylent green when they're no longer useful and old?

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    All hail the dystopian future, where countries don't need people to make babies, in fact, they oughtn't, as it decreases worker productivity. They can just order a steady amount of new slaves workers being born.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    As a gay guy I'd love if this were real and widely available. I would be able to become a father, but not have to navigate the moral minefields of surrogacy and adoption

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    And here is no issues of morality 🀣

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Well provided someone consents to "just" give you an egg (which may have moral issues but are far simpler by comparison) then yeah there's much less to navigate

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago

    This is the problem, men thinking is just an egg... Thing. But baby human being ? What about baby??? Like everyone's dream is to not have mother even the one who birthed that human being. How is abouts baby's psychological state knowing that s/he came from machine? Nah, there are no morality issues..

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    This is a minor sorry point in the classic "hell a cyber punk thriller" game from the 90's.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί