• Songs of the Past is now available to wishlist ahead of its 2027 release. It will take players to the brand new realm of Letten — an idyllic land of rural tradition that hides a dark secret just below the surface.
  • Remastered — a free upgrade for existing The Witcher 3 owners on qualifying platforms — brings a slew of upgrades and enhancements to visuals, performance, gameplay, and more when it launches on PC, PlayStation 5, and Xbox Series X|S.
  • The Witcher 3 is coming to two brand new platforms. A native version of Remastered will be released on Nintendo Switch 2, and through a new partnership between CD PROJEKT RED and Blizzard Entertainment, Battle.net — both on September 29.
  • All owners of The Witcher 3 can now play to two acclaimed expansions — Hearts of Stone and Blood and Wine — at no additional cost.

all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 32 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Nice to see a developer being pro-consumer on these times of corporate greed running rampant.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Remember their lies about cyberpunk.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It took a while, but seems like they eventually got it sorted?

    It’s not great that it was broken trash at release, but it’s better to become a great game than to stay a broken pile of trash.

    Even the ps4/xb1 version got pretty good from what I’ve heard

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] -3 points 2 months ago

    At its core, its still an unfinished product, because many of the features that were advertised are not there, there are many sections of the map that you can go to, where different things were planned, but are now just empty rooms, etc. They released it knowing very well about its state, at least, the very least the game systems like skills have now been improved to be somewhat finished.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    To the Witcher fans out there, if I haven’t played the game, should I play it now or wait for the new expansion?

    I just have a steamdeck, so I’m not too concerned about the new graphics as I’m sure I can’t run it well anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Start now it’s a big game and one of the DLCs is as big as the main game itself. I don’t think you’ll be missing anything by starting without the new DLC being available. I’m gonna play it and I haven’t played the Witcher 3 in years. I may even replay the whole game again just to prepare.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    I looked though the announcement. Is the remaster coming out next year with the new expansion? I’ll probably just wait as I already have the game, but I’d like to just start fresh or I’ll have rpg ambesia by the time the remaster cones out.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago*

    I personally would wait for the improved controls in the remaster, but it’s free so there’s no reason not to try and see if it feels good or not.

    If you start playing now you’ll have lots of time to play the existing base plus expansions. Blood and Wine took about as long as the base game for me.

    It’s a long game. Very good story and characters, but long.

    Also, don’t be an idiot like me: I got the bad ending by choosing funny options not knowing it affected specific outcomes and later events. No spoilers, but you don’t want that. I suggest playing in character (however you feel your Geralt should be) and sticking with it.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I have played it before (twice, never completing it) and I thought about giving it another try but I am going to wait since there are a lot of changes. Thinking on the skill tree as it is going to get revamped.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    If only the sell of the witcher 3 could surpass GTA6. I would laughs for months. Oh well, I should just appreciate a good news when I get it.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Noice! I tried to give this a fair shake but it was at a tumultuous time in my life, and I just lost interest after a few hours not having time to dump into it. So I never got the dlcs. Now I'm getting all this shit for free? I will continue to stan cd projekt red for some time to come. I even had a good, fairly glitchless, time with cyber punk day one on a rebuilt $30 ps4 slim.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Holy shit, this is amazing!

    I hope they don't fuck it up with terrible performance, Denuvo, or proton incompatibility.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Again? They remastered it 3/4 years ago already

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Probably to playtest a new iteration of their engine to make it ready for Witcher 4. While W3 is old, it's updated version would require PS5/Xbox Series X/S.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Didn’t they already release a remaster a year or so ago? Is this another remaster?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I tried playing the game for a couple of hours, but I gave up. Should I give it another chance by playing it more to see if the game reveals itself?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    It's a very slow burn experience. Expect 100+ hours to get through, especially with the DLC. It's not for everyone certainly, but there's a lot of great stuff in it. Two hours in you've seen very little of the game, or it's story - which I think is it's strongest part.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    If you’re having a hard time getting into it, I’d skip all the side quests until you get to Novigrad. I started and dropped it a few times because I got bored of wandering around the swamp, but to me the game comes alive in Novigrad

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Can't wait for the CPU bottleneck to be even worse. 🥰

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    When will they announce the remaster of the remaster of the most recent software?

  • source
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    Looks like I’ll have to give The Witcher another go. I got most of the way through it years ago and picked it up again recently. The controls, especially in combat, are too rough. Hopefully that’s one of the things improved!

  • source
  • 14 comments in c/games@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] [S] 21 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Always nice to see a company be pro-consumer, pro-gamer in these times of corporate greed that see gamers as nothing more than psychological manipulable profit.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Especially given how easily many seem to have willfully forgotten the horrendous Cyberpunk launch, they could've easily pulled a Nintendo with this stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    All owners of The Witcher 3 can now play to two acclaimed expansions — Hearts of Stone and Blood and Wine — at no additional cost.

    Ohh wow, that's nice. I didn't get it first time because the final boss of the base game sour my whole love of it, gotta give it another go some time.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    HoS is a phenomenal piece of DLC that you’re supposed to play alongside the main story. It has a truly fantastic villain. BaW is a nice capstone for Geralt’s story, which takes place after the events of the main story.

    I tend to fall into the “DLC is bad” camp, but both W3 expansions are perfect examples of how DLC can be good. I tend to dislike DLC because it tends to break (at least) one of the following criteria:
    The base game is already complete, and doesn’t require the DLC for a full experience.
    The DLC meshes neatly within the base game without feeling bolted onto the side.
    The DLC adds genuinely interesting content to the game.
    All three critera are what I would typically complain about with DLC, and Witcher 3’s DLC passes all three litmus tests. So any complaints I would have about them would essentially boil down to personal preference rather than objective reasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Agreed, and also about the DLC rankings. Blood and Wine is alright but it's wildly overrated. It's a nice post-game vacation and it has some fun stuff in it, but it's ideal to play like a year after finishing base game + HoS, in my opinion.

    Hearts of Stone is the best Witcher content CDPR has produced yet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    I got the base game for free on GoG after playing it once on Gamepass a few years back, now I get the two expansions + remastered as well lol

    Child me would be amazed at how easy it is to play AAA games without spending a dime nowadays. I grew up with a dozen or so games and that was it because my father didn't want to spend more money on videogames lol

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

    Another next-gen witcher 3 update? Not to look a gift horse in the mouth but the last one was both underperforming and kind of underwhelming. Why not do a witcher 1 next gen? The old goose desperately neets a graphical and/or combat update.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Damn, my 'platform' is too weak to play the unenhanced version, of you pile enhancements on it I'll have to wait a decade or more (given the ongoing RAMaggedon).

  • source