People complain about their smart TVs but you can also just buy a dumb TV. I did in late 2024, expecting tariffs.

TVs have always been standalone products that do more than just display an image. Monitors on the other hand serve only this purpose.

Why are we not seeing that with speakers or glasses? Or headphones? There are smart speakers that blast ads when used with the "correct" software. That's been the case since before 2016, but it's not how things generally are. But I still have my ad-free headphones, ad-free computer, ad-free so on and so forth electronic devices. Nobody knows how libre hardware and infrastructure will advance in the next ten years. Removing ads from a smart monitor, should the tech ever happen to gain dominance, will be as easy as connecting a USB C cable and hitting 'flash' on a website.

This belief that everything will turn into a dystopia is as unfounded and unrealistic as the belief that life 10 years from now will be utopian. Just because a news outlet spins up a story does not mean it's going to be the direction things are headed.

I was thinking of the second part of the article, under the heading "Smart monitors", which talks about monitors running their own independent OS with the ability to report on what you're doing without going through software running on the computer. That seems like a different threat than those monitors that just cause a malicious driver to be installed in Windows. The monitor's spying activity would not depend on the host OS or drivers, though it would need its own network connection. The obvious thing would be to block that, but I hear some smart TVs are designed not to function unless they have an internet connection, and they'd probably try that with smart monitors too. Hopefully then they just wouldn't manage to sell any.

I understood this section to mean that the smart monitor runs its own OS and sends its own network traffic, not depending on software running on the PC:

Smart monitors connect to the Internet and run their own operating system (OS) and apps. They can be useful for performing tasks, like video conferencing, watching a show from a streaming service, or managing your smart home without attaching a computer.

LG’s and Samsung’s smart monitors use the same ad-serving OSes that their respective smart TVs do, meaning they’re poised to use automatic content recognition (ACR). Users of LG and Samsung smart monitors, including reviews site RTINGs, have shown the displays being able to track user activity.

So then you'd have the same challenges as with a smart TV: unless you block its network access, it can report on every image you display. And I've heard that some smart TVs refuse to function unless you give them internet access, so smart monitors might work similarly. Then the only solution would be not to buy a smart monitor, even if you're in full control of the PC.

Yes, as long as the monitor isn't designed to stop functioning unless it's given a network connection.

Yep I agree with you also I never hook up the internet to any display. It makes me sad I just had to give up my pioneer plasma recently.

You'd think so, but getting people to connect their monitor to wifi is going to be a hard sell.

There has to be some useful function to sell people on, otherwise they'll join the ranks of wifi-equipped fridges and microwaves which almost never actually get connected to wifi.

By the very nature of Linux it can't happen from a simple plug and play.

You mean enshitlish?