all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 23 points 2 months ago

Meta really trying to catch up to X and AI companies.

"Look! We can even things more heinous than usual!"

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago

    Booo give us Bernie

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    Ads are basically how all the bad things on the internet propagate. I do not understand the people that are technically savvy but do not run ad blockers in 2026. I wish the companies showing the ads were actually held accountable for what the ads showed so maybe they would care about shit like this.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago*

    You have no idea how convoluted and over engineered the ad serving tech is on Facebook/Meta. It's basically an arms race against ad blockers.

    Unless I'm mistaken, Ublock Origin recently admitted that they basically just can't allocate resource trying to fight Facebook's ad system.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    They're pretending that they're still in 2008 where a basic word or letter swap in the copy wouldn't trigger the blocklist.

    Facebook 100% knows about those ads and is willing to be complicit in the scams for pure profit.

    With the massive datacenters running their useless LLMs there's no way that they couldn't detect those ads.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Nudes classification predates LLMs by decades. Its accurate, and dirt cheap, because it had to be to detect CP.

    You can bet Lemmy.world uses it. Plenty of smaller companies do it. Pick any NSFW picture on CivitAI, and you can see how insanely accurate autotagging has gotten.

    So, no... this was not an accident on Facebook's part.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    What's even creepier is that Facebook would track the snot out of anyone interacting with the ad. It would aggressively serve them more content like that.

    ...Don't people have any shame, even if they're into weird shit? What they've been tapping will be obvious to anyone who looks at their feed.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Facebook: Break things, ask for forgiveness later, when they have more leverage.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Anyone with that app on their device is a dangerous pervert, so it would be cool if a new app promising the same features appeared but it just doxxes everyone who installs it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I love how they call it "nudify". I wish the AI tits n' bits community would have chosen a funnier word like "entitification" or "pusspainting" so the news felt they had to call it that instead.

    Nothing will beat the legends who came up with "teledildonics" though.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    I really don't want to see that. People are strange.

  • source
  • [+] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Noooow I see why they want all this age verification crap

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Anyone have a gift link?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    That is 99% fucking gross. Nevermind for a minute about how it's wrong. What is the target market for seeing a bunch of geriatric fascist tools naked?

    Fucking gross. That former senator from AZ, what's that turncoat's name, she is a rare exception. Who else, I can't think of another female politician that the public would want to see naked.

    Maybe zuck whacks off to nancy pelosi deep fake nudes?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    It's all for Susan Collins right?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago

    I'm only interested if I get AOC feet pics.

  • source
  • 11 comments in c/wildfeed@sh.itjust.works view that post
    [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    saying “all the characters are real people” and describing it as “the AI that men actually use.”

    invites paid users to upload photos so that it can use them in scenarios including “bedroom rape” and “Disney love.”

    Okay, seriously, what the fuck is this timeline? What is going on?

    I'm scared. I need an adult.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Pretty normal thing for Meta to do, isn't it?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    The Kromix app, which was hosted by Apple’s App Store prior to a request for comment from WIRED,

    Apple has struggled to keep similar tools, which violate its policies against nonconsensual intimate imagery, nudifying, and sexually explicit content, off the App Store.

    In January, as Grok was used to create around 3 million sexualized images of women and girls, officials in Sweden, England, and Northern Ireland were targeted by people using the technology, often using official images as a starting point.

    Yes, this isn't surprising for Meta to allow with no oversight, but it's not just Meta. This shit is everywhere. And if we don't keep calling it out, if we don't keep pushing back and asking why it's there, why it's allowed, it will continue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Yes, I agree. It's great that people are still fighting this bullshit. I just stopped buying and using their products and services.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

    I can't help but think the near complete lack of moderation at meta is intentional considering they must be making ad revenue of this and other controversial aps.

    Still, the bigger story is that this is happening at all, that it's all women, and it's all geared toward men. We can assume it's selling if there's this much of it, that it's this hard to keep off platforms, and that's fucking horrifying.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    There's plenty of moderation. It's just not doing what you'd like it to.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Paul says that Meta has increasingly relied on AI to flag and vet advertisements, while laying off human moderators. “Ads are Meta’s primary product, and there appears to be zero quality control,” she says. “Meta is also making a lot of statements publicly, banking on their AI and the sophistication of it, while simultaneously saying they use AI to review their ad library and nothing's perfect.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment