Julia Curlee briefed presidents and became the White House’s senior career intelligence official. Then a far-right campaign targeted her for being transgender.

Julia Curlee spent nearly two decades carrying the country’s secrets.

She worked in war zones, traveled to 35 countries, briefed presidents, and boarded Air Force One with the President’s Daily Brief. She was trusted to decide what some of the world's most powerful people needed to know before beginning their days.

But in a remarkable first-person account published Monday by The Atlantic, Curlee describes how the second Trump administration came to view something else as dangerously sensitive: the fact that one of its most experienced intelligence officials was a transgender woman.

Her identity was never a secret inside the government. Trump officials had known about it during his first term, when Curlee briefed senior White House officials and became Vice President Mike Pence’s daily intelligence briefer. It became intolerable, she writes, only when the public might learn about it.

“The White House had needed me,” Curlee writes. “Trump officials had known I was trans from day one.”

Curlee joined the CIA in 2007 and became the first officer at the agency to transition openly and continue serving. She had dreamed of becoming an intelligence officer since childhood. Her other lifelong conviction — that she should have been born a woman — seemed, for years, incompatible with that calling.

She transitioned in 2013. Her first day at work as Julia passed without incident. Four years later, she wrote about the experience in The Atlantic under the pseudonym Jenny Hall, explaining how living openly had made her a more effective intelligence officer. The CIA later used the essay in college recruiting, according to Curlee.

Then came an assignment to prepare and deliver the President’s Daily Brief during Trump’s first administration. The work required arriving around midnight, studying intelligence through the early morning, and entering the West Wing before dawn.

Curlee eventually became Pence’s briefer. It was an unlikely pairing. Pence had spent years opposing marriage equality and LGBTQ+ rights. Curlee was a gay transgender woman, a wife, and a mother.

Yet Pence, she says, treated her as a trusted professional. He took notes, asked questions, and invited Curlee’s family to the White House when her assignment ended. There, he took her mother’s hand and said, “You must be very proud of your daughter.”

For Curlee, the moment proved that public service could rise above politics. She could serve an administration whose policies she opposed, and its leaders could recognize her expertise and humanity.

That belief brought her back to the White House under President Joe Biden, where she served as a National Security Council director. It also persuaded her to remain when Trump returned to office in January 2025.

As Biden’s political appointees departed, Curlee became the senior career intelligence official in the White House. She helped prepare the incoming administration to assume power, even as colleagues warned that she could become a target.

On Trump’s first day back in office, he signed an executive order directing the federal government to recognize only two sexes. Curlee began leaving the White House complex and crossing Pennsylvania Avenue to use restrooms in nearby coffee shops.

She stayed.

Three days into the administration, roughly 160 National Security Council employees detailed from other agencies were abruptly ordered to leave the White House. Curlee was spared. She assembled what remained of her team and continued briefing officials.

The arrangement lasted 69 days.

Curlee was visiting family in Roanoke, Virginia, when she received a Saturday phone call telling her that her White House assignment had ended. She said that officials did not explain. In the same conversation, they asked her to return Monday because they still needed her work.

After hanging up, Curlee saw that far-right provocateur Laura Loomer had posted about a transgender person “Biden holdover” inside the White House, accused the unnamed official of hating Trump, and asked her followers to help identify the person.

Curlee returned to work anyway. She spent three more days completing a budget project and transferring the portfolio she had managed for nearly two years.

“We need you. We need your service. But we don’t want anyone to know you are here,” she writes of the message she received.

Curlee does not claim to have proof that Trump or Loomer personally ordered her removal because she is transgender. She was never given a reason. But her account leaves little ambiguity about the sequence: Her identity had been known and accepted while her work remained useful and private. Once it threatened to become public, her service no longer protected her.

Days later, Trump fired several other National Security Council officials after meeting with Loomer, who had urged him to purge officials she considered insufficiently loyal.

Curlee returned to the CIA. There, she watched the agency dismantle its LGBTQ+ employee organization, remove Pride flags, and impose the administration’s restrictions on transgender workers. Earlier this year, she finally left the career she had once expected to hold for life.

In an accompanying Radio Atlantic interview, Curlee delivered a painful reversal of the message she once offered LGBTQ+ young people.

“Now I could not in good conscience advise any LGBT American to apply to work at CIA,” she said.

🗃️

all 85 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 43 points 2 months ago (21 children)

Eh, she had been doing that job for decades, and didn't agree with Trump politically. Someone else voted for the leopards who ate her face.

  • source
  • hideshow 21 child comments
  • [–] [S] 17 points 2 months ago (17 children)
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (16 children)

    Has the CIA historically been anti-trans? That's the only way this makes halfway sense as a leopard eating face situation.

    You may dislike her for working for the CIA, and you may think she deserved it. But I don't see this fitting the theme.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    she watched the agency dismantle its LGBTQ+ employee organization, remove Pride flags, and impose the administration’s restrictions on transgender workers. Earlier this year, she finally left the career she had once expected to hold for life.

    Anti-Trans because Laura Loomer had Trump's ear for a second. Probably told him there is a secret trans conspiracy deep state.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 16 points 2 months ago

    Yes.

    You may dislike her for working for the CIA, and you may think she deserved it. But I don’t see this fitting the theme.

    What do you earnestly believe the CIA does‽

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (11 children)

    She didn’t deserve it merely for existing. From my perspective, she deserved it for her asinine, inexplicable decision to continue serving an administration that clearly didn’t respect people like her. She continued to serve an administration that had become an enemy.

    She could have just walked away, but instead walked across the street to piss at Starbucks, then walked right back.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (10 children)

    She was only two years away from a retirement pension when trump took office the second time.

    Walking away from a career is not as easy as you're making it out to be. You think her work experience would apply to literally any civilian job outside of government contracting?

    One thing about government employees is that they learn to ride out the waves when the political leanings of the administration switch back and forth. They learn to detach their personal beliefs and opinions from whoever is in office, because their job isn't supposed to be political.

    This administration is an anomaly in that regard. But many careerists stayed under the belief that if they could keep the government working long enough, a new administration would come in and fix whatever this one breaks. They probably trusted in checks and balances to prevent things from getting this out of hand.

    But yeah, two years away from a retirement pension, and then have to leave and go be a barista somewhere? In this economy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Am I supposed to feel sorry for her because she decided to keep working for a fascist? She gambled the freedom of others on her pension. Fuck that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    Whoever your boss is, he's probably a fascist too. I've heard more than one leftist say there's no ethical employment under capitalism, that people just have to survive how they can. It's how they justify to themselves the fact that their whole lives are spent working to make oligarchs richer.

    But obviously it doesn't apply when it's someone else doing it. No, can't have that can we?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)

    They learn to detach their personal beliefs and opinions from whoever is in office, because their job isn’t supposed to be political.

    Quite the peculiar dissonance here. Are most Amekkkunts this dissonant on what politics they praxis‽

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

    It's not really that dissonant. If every government employee turned over every time a new president gets elected, we wouldn't have any public servants. Only sycophants and lackeys. A big issue with the current administration is that he fired most of the careerists and replaced them with his loyalists.

    Non-political government workers are necessary in a healthy democracy. The only reason it's a problem in this case is because the democracy is not healthy right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

    If every government employee turned over every time a new president gets elected, we wouldn’t have any public servants. Only sycophants and lackeys. A big issue with the current administration is that he fired most of the careerists and replaced them with his loyalists.

    I see my error. doesn't even teach political sciences and theory for you to dissonance militant intelligence officers (spies) to actual servants that face the public, answer to the public’s summons, and hold their deeds accountable to public scrutiny. If they did teach Political Science 101, you would already know sycophants and lackeys is what the has always depended on to genocide the indigenous and the “Negros.” Every president, since even Georgey himself, fired officials for treason and consulting with the enemy since soldiers would not prove useful. It was soo bad, your Republic was about to fail in less than decade. Your country needs loyalists, otherwise it's not a government you have, but a commune.

    Non-political government workers are necessary in a healthy democracy

    Reread your contradiction here, twice.

    democracy is not healthy right now

    Mob rulings are not healthy either in any true liberal society. But you never had either. You had rich white men convincing poor white men they were better than the savages, better than the slaves. You have a plutocracy, and it never ceased being one. Your ballots only serve to distract the population on which boot to shine. Not that the boot will ever leave the public’s face.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (2 children)

    I see my error. Amerikkka doesn't even teach political sciences and theory for you to dissonance militant intelligence officers (spies) to actual servants that face the public, answer to the public’s summons, and hold their deeds accountable to public scrutiny. If they did teach Political Science 101, you would already know sycophants and lackeys is what the Amerikkka has always depended on to genocide the indigenous and the “Negros.” Every president, since even Georgey himself, fired officials for treason and consulting with the enemy since soldiers would not prove useful. It was soo bad, your Republic was about to fail in less than decade. Your country needs loyalists, otherwise it's not a government you have, but a commune.

    You know, being stuck in a over century ago kinda just makes you look politically illiterate. I'm well-aware the US government has and always had issues. I'm well-aware that the US education system has failed the public it's meant to serve, but that doesn't mean every USian is helplessly ignorant. Some of us pay attention and read enough from reliable sources to have an inkling of what's going on in the world. I'm also well-aware that the CIA has been involved in controversies.

    But to reduce all of the above to just those criticisms in order to make a half-baked, one-sided, and half-informed point is, well, reductive. And also ignorant. You have no idea what the average person working at the CIA, or any intelligence agency, does every day. True that most were fired by this administration and replaced by lackeys, and then put to corrupt uses. That's the problem, not the fact that there were career civil servants who believed in their mission enough to show up, who had to be fired to make way for the lackeys to begin with.

    Every country has spies. Any who doesn't gets fucked. It's a normal and expected part of international relations and diplomacy at this point. Who do you think it was that collected enough intelligence to warn that russia was gearing up to invade Ukraine leading up to February 2022? Or are you the sort who simps for russia at every chance you get?

    Non-political government workers are necessary in a healthy democracy

    Reread your contradiction here, twice.

    That's not a contradiction. If you don't even understand the difference between a political government official, and a non-political government employee, then you are severely outclassed in this conversation and I suggest you stop embarrassing yourself.

    democracy is not healthy right now

    Mob rulings are not healthy either in any true liberal society. But you never had either.

    Who said anything about mob rulings being healthy? Firing all the careerists and replacing them with lackeys is what's "mob rule" here. Not careerists staying on their jobs regardless of the ever-shifting political tides.

    You had rich white men convincing poor white men they were better than the savages, better than the slaves. You have a plutocracy, and it never ceased being one.

    I never said otherwise. I'm aware the US has problems. But unlike you apparently, I'm capable of thinking beyond black-and-white, and I understand that every situation is more nuanced and complex than you're making it out to be.

    Yes, it's a deeply flawed system. There's still a need for basic governance, and the people who show up every day in a non-political capacity in order to keep the gears of the government turning are not the problem.

    I already explained how this particular administration is anomalous and problematic, so don't hit me with "but they're turning the gears of a fascist regime." It was only able to become a fascist regime because they replaced all the careerists with sycophantic loyalists.

    Your ballots only serve to distract the population on which boot to shine. Not that the boot will ever leave the public’s face.

    Oh, so you're true intentions come out. You're here to try to dissuade americans from voting. Got it. It all makes sense now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    You have no idea what the average person working at the CIA, or any intelligence agency, does every day.

    mrw

    IF ONLY THERE WAS SOME WAY FOR THE AVERAGE ΔΕΜΟΣ TO GET INFORMED ON WHAT THEIR SPIES DISCOVER THEIR ENEMIES ARE DOING, AND WHAT DEMOS CAN DO TO ACTUALLY INSTALL MOB RULE NATION WIDE

    not the fact that there were career civil servants who believed in their mission enough to show up, who had to be fired to make way for the lackeys to begin with.

    Is that a problem for demos, servants, or spies?
    If spies know every administration changes hand on the selection of next Chief of Defense (CoD), why was this spy

    not informing transpeople CoD Trump was out to Plünderung des Instituts für Sexualwissenschaft in ?

    Every country has spies.

    Is this another mis or disinfo your forsaken Nazi country brainwashes you to think?

    It’s a normal and expected part of international relations and diplomacy at this point.

    And you're disinforming me you have a god damn democracy. 🖕 your espionage, 🖕 sabotage, 🖕 your “mob” tactics.

    russia was gearing up to invade Ukraine leading up to February 2022?

    The same people that leaked Ukrainian intelligence to gain better deals with dictators in Asia.

    political government official, and a non-political government employee, then you are severely outclassed in this conversation and I suggest you stop embarrassing yourself.

    Yet you demand me to see them as mere civil servants, and not enforcers of your imperial campaigns. Which is it, are they employees of demos, or employees of the arms of your state, abroad and domestic?

    異議あり!

    Firing all the careerists and replacing them with lackeys is what’s “mob rule” here.

    Say it with gusto! You have a despotic office. That's what it means to follow the highest chief of defense. Are you implying spies cannot be fired at any given moment, or do I have to “averagely” be unaware how easily your Chiefs burn both intelligence, but officers in the line of illegal international espionage‽ Say it with pride! Despot in office, despot in admin!

    Not careerists staying on their jobs regardless of the ever-shifting political tides.

    This is amusing, that you keep careering spies as long standing possible careers that can easily shift political tides, and not the fungible officers that have been burned easier than a midterm. I commend our Mrs. Curlee here managed to survive four administration worths of “tides.” But she signed up exactly at the start of OP Enduring Freedom. She’s a Zionist for Zeus’s sake. Who wakes up, watches 9/11 and decides, “yeah, I wanna spy to kill Al-Keada.” I didn't ignore the 35 illegal espionage ops she partook.

    She was an active collaborator of the genocides in the Middle East.

    There’s still a need for basic governance, and the people who show up every day in a non-political capacity in order to keep the gears of the government turning are not the problem.

    That is called loyalty. Loyalty to governing, loyalty to bureaucracy: a political act.

    There is no “non-political” government position, esp. that of espionage. She was a spy, motivated by terrorism, acting for genocide, not informing the public of “another airstrike sir, thousands were eagles, but we got ’Kaeada‘s Weapon of Mass deception”

    this particular administration is anomalous and problematic

    I am saying you’re disinforming the public. It is routine, and now more blatant. Enduring Freedom wasn't enough. Your Eagles have come to roost.

    Oh, so you’re true intentions come out. You’re here to try to dissuade americans from voting. Got it. It all makes sense now.

    When can we vote for direct acts, Joseph McCarthy⸮

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It's the CIA, do you think CIA only holds good secrets?

    You mfs went berserk when all the shit about CIA came out and then called whistleblowers terrorists and what not, but didn't aim to fix a single fucking thing.

    Yet you still think the people who work for them should get the benefit of the double and think they don't agree with the administration they work with?

    If she didn't agree with Trump there would be a treasure trove of leaks and whistleblowing going through this bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago

    Right. The «Where’s the #EpsteinFiles» want me to sympathize the PedoCabal‽

    Goodness gracious, Mrs. Curlee, I better see ALL THE UNREDACTED FILES in threadiverse’s command station by tomorrow morning 0700 sharp, on the double!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Bud, the US government is the leopard. She betrayed everyone else by joining its actual genocide facilitation team as a trans woman; one of the groups the genocide facilitation team has targeted aggressively for decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    My polygot ass couldn't even dare approach a Karen.
    Why do Americentrists even assume I am scathing yapper, when I specifically choose the Canadian instance to 🔁?

    Amekunts this illiterate?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago

    Leopards would never eat MY face, said the woman who briefed face eating leopards

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago (36 children)

    On Trump’s first day back in office, he signed an executive order directing the federal government to recognize only two sexes. Curlee began leaving the White House complex and crossing Pennsylvania Avenue to use restrooms in nearby coffee shops.

    She stayed.

    This is where my sympathy for her evaporated, and even causes me to question her judgment.

    Make no mistake - I don’t agree with the administration’s actions, even a little. However, staying in a situation where you’re clearly, undeniably not wanted is a terrible choice.

  • source
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (32 children)

    Should climate scientists just quit then because Trump doesn't like what they're telling him about clean coal?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 32 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (5 children)

    Yes, leave the country to for a place that will accept them and their talents. Let the cespit rot and guard a socity that accepts you and is worth fighting for. America isn't the only place on earth hiring people like this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Yes, leave the country to for a place that will accept them and their talents. Let the cespit rot and guard a socity that accepts you and is worth fighting for. America isn’t the only place on earth hiring people like this.

    No country or continent would have the resources to just accept all those climate scientists. And just letting people rot is not amongst their nature.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    No country or continent would have the resources to just accept all those climate scientists.

    Just how many climate scientists do you think there are in the US?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Why would a few thousand scientists be impossible for an entire continent to accommodate?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Research funding does not shift that quickly. I'm not a scientist but I'm pretty sure most of Europe's funding has already been assigned to scientists for a year or two. They'd be able to expand their funding to grab up a few hundred of the best scientists. Corporate positions would be able to cycle through for the best ones as well. And Europe has it's own funding priorities already, even though I assume the whole continent appreciates scientific research. I think it's reasonable to assume they were already spending what they could on research.

    The general feeling I'm getting reading the news is that Trump is rat fucking our scientific research for a decade, because even with a committed administration it will probably take that long to rebuild what we have lost. I'm not seeing how Europe could perform better when they're already more pro-science than us.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Why just quit, they can flee to a country that still cares about climate science and continue working on important research. The US isn't going to produce anything worthwhile in that field for at least two more years, the only studies they'll fund are ones that say coal, oil and natural gas are good for the environment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    You’re acting like that’s so easy.

    I sympathize with the notion, but quitting one's living is scary, especially if they have people To support. Immigrating somewhere else, finding a place that will take you, uprooting your whole life, is hard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Actual insane argument. How the fuck do people think its so easy to just uproot and move like that. That is a major life choice and can be insanely hard and stressful.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    It's easy to argue from a chair.

    ...But yeah. The internet is littered with stories of academics who did just this, and how insanely hard it was for them. And the ones who write articles in major newspapers are the ones who sucessfully transitioned.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    they can flee to a country that still cares about climate science and continue working on important research

    Research funding doesn't just pop up that quickly.

    The US isn’t going to produce anything worthwhile in that field for at least two more years

    The currently employed climate scientists would disagree.

    the only studies they’ll fund are ones that say coal, oil and natural gas are good for the environment

    They're still funding climate studies. Republicans are still trying to gut them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (11 children)

    Maybe. Do they consider the administration’s position a personal attack? Then yes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (10 children)

    It seems to me that any employee could fall under this logic given that every CEO has a interest in automating away their entire work force.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (9 children)

    I didn’t know that CEOs could draft executive orders

    🎯 1
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    A CEO can draft discriminatory policies which take immediate effect and it's up to employees to ask a judge to stop them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago (7 children)

    Quite the capitalist approach, when a CIA can just assassinate CEOs and classify their actions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (6 children)

    A CEO could also pay for assassinations and classify their actions

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)

    But the CIA has clearance, C👔 have to lobby.
    Glad you can demonstrate conservative values.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

    The CIA doesn't have clearance to perform illegal actions. Neither does a CEO.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)

    Ok, last disinfo strike.

    I hereby request permission to disengage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    From your linked article:

    American citizens working for al Qaeda overseas can legally be targeted and killed by the CIA under President Bush's rules for the war on terrorism, U.S. officials say.

    The authority to kill U.S. citizens is granted under a secret finding signed by the president after the Sept. 11 attacks that directs the CIA to covertly attack al Qaeda anywhere in the world.

    Seems like the CIA can legally kill you if you work for Al Qaeda

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    under President Bush’s rules for the war

    Not under Congressional rules, not American people’s permission.

    Disengage.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago (7 children)

    Non sequitur.

    Should a spy spy?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)

    Enjoy the consequences of spying without consent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

    I do not understand what the consequences are in this context?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

    Yes I do.

    What are the consequences in this context?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    As a burned spy, she will not be allowed to have consent when she gets spied on, by all 6 groups: The CIA, Trump, Congress, USJ, foreign spies, and now the public. This is the consequence of espionage: your private life is over. It is now a complete public life.
    Enjoy the consequences.
    her very own truman show

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    The CIA isn't spying on her unless she's making contact with foreigners the CIA is interested in. Trump doesn't give a shit about her. Congress isn't spying on people. What is USJ? Foreign Spies spying on us is a given, nothing we can do about that. I'm contesting the public spying on her given she publicly gave an interview, and has a public profile.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (15 children)

    This is not leopards eat my face material. Her job was to summarize intelligence for any elected official.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    I respectfully disagree.

    The job changed on her, as jobs occasionally do. It became summarizing intelligence for an elected official who only recognized two sexes. She decided to stay regardless. The message of hateful intolerance was written on the wall as clearly as possible. Her choice to ignore that reality is how she got her face eaten.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (7 children)

    The job changed on her to Trump 1, then again to Biden, then again to Trump 2.

    And she stayed because elected leaders need intelligence gathered from their own sources so they can make the best decision for their people.

    Leopards Eat My Face is situations when people actually want the Leopard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Leopards Eat My Face is situations when people actually want the Leopard.

    That’s a good point. Wanting to stay and appease the Leopard seems close enough in this case, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Wanting to stay and appease the Leopard seems close enough in this case, though.

    Would you add every other federal employee who lost their job?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    If they lost it because of an obvious discriminatory policy against them, but they chose to ignore reality and remain a good little worker bee anyway, then yes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    That seems like appeasement to the asshole who want's them gone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    The asshole would be happy whether the employee quits or gets fired. It’s unavoidable. I’m more concerned with the wellbeing of the employee than the asshole, and hope the employee chooses to leave on their own terms.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    for any elected official

    no no no

    Let’s set some honest good faith arguments:

    • Who exactly does she answer to?
    • What intelligence did she gather?
    • For what purpose is that intelligence gathered?

    Does doing illegal espionage for a singular official person count as “summary” for any office?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)
    • The executive branch
    • Intelligence from every spy & spy satellite presumably.
    • To keep the president informed

    Does doing illegal espionage for a singular official person count as “summary” for any office?

    Yes. A decision has to be made with the best available information.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    A decision a President, not Congress, not the Supreme Justices, or the public makes.
    This is why she is by academic definition, a private spy. Not a public one.

    Now that as a spy, she has been publicly burned, I hope she can continue sabotaging her public.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Congress passed a Law creating the CIA. The CIA is supervised by all three branches.

    The decision is made by an elected president.

    As a CIA spy she worked for the public.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I'm not a fan of the amount of victim blaming going on in this thread.

    Anyway, here's my hot take: she doesn't deserve to be discriminated against.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    You're wrong. It isn't "victim blaming" to condemn traitors. This woman helped the single greatest threat to trans people internationally, allowed the CIA to recruit more traitors with her words, apparently even aided in the establishment of a regime within the metropole that explicitly intends to eradicate trans people within its borders. This woman only left after they made her and not after trans people were fucking ridiculed for being trans in the new fucking work camps?

    I wish you people would actually defend trans people the way you defend toothless liberal values, this woman is not an ally and never has been. If any of you people think cooperation with fascists benefits us in any way, here you go.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 months ago

    Nobody on both threads are discriminating her for being trans. We are discriminating a snitch for snitching against others’ wills. What part of espionage is deserves blaming‽

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    FFS of all the people you KNOW can keep a fucking secret...

    🎯 1
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago

    Trusting trans anarchists ⋙ CIA ≫ fucking Presidents.

    Seeing Florencia vouch for a snitch just because the snitch is 🏳️‍⚧️ was not in my

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Every time I hear about something like this I get the feeling that it’s actually because that person is ethical and wouldn’t sell their secrets to the highest bidder rather than being about the thing they say.

    🎯 1
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago

    I hate how the intelligence “community” is already defending her selling secrets to The White House, because foreigners also do not deserve their secrets stay secret. Cry me a river, your job was snitching to leopards where prey is at!

  • source
  • parent
  • 36 comments in c/transgender@lemmy.blahaj.zone view that post