Opposition to artificial intelligence data centers has exploded across the US in 2026, as a recent Annenberg Public Policy Center poll showed that more than 60% of Americans say they are against building AI facilities in their areas.

However, a new survey highlighted by Futurism on Sunday shows that the AI industry has bigger problems than just the unpopularity of data centers.

As Futurism noted, the poll by CNBC found widespread distrust of artificial intelligence CEOs among Americans between the ages of 18 and 34.

In fact, more than two-thirds of respondents said they did not trust Palantir CEO Alex Karp, Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang, or SpaceX CEO Elon Musk to responsibly expand the use of AI.

"Those are some appalling approval ratings," commented Futurism, "reflecting the massive swing in popularity the tech industry has experienced over the last decade, driven by concerns around data privacy, the purposeful decay of once-useful platforms, and the erosion of democracy."

The survey comes amid signs that the AI industry knows it faces a significant deficit in public opinion.

Anthropic boss Amodei wrote a social media post on Sunday acknowledging that "the public has a negative view of AI," which he said was "fundamentally a crisis of trust."

"I think that ordinary people don't trust companies, governments, or the tech industry and always suspect that we are cooking up some new way to screw them over," wrote Amodei. "The causes of this go back decades and AI is just the latest iteration of it."

The Anthropic CEO added that he didn't think any positive public relations campaign could turn around people's perception of the industry, and he said that one of the few ways it could gain trust was "actually curing cancer."

The rapid expansion of AI data centers, pushed by President Donald Trump, has provoked grassroots campaigns in communities across the country, with people loudly opposing the facilities that have been linked to high household electricity bills, massive water consumption, and few, if any, long-term job opportunities.

Amodei's musings about AI's unpopularity came days after Zuckerberg published a 6,500-word manifesto, in which he pushed back on AI developers who believe the technology will "eliminate most jobs and much of humanity's relevance," while insisting that Meta would develop "personal superintelligence for everyone" that would put "power in people's hands" rather than taking it away.

However, Zuckerberg's promises of a benevolent AI future drew skepticism from TechCrunch AI editor Russell Brandom, who argued in an essay published last week that the Meta chief's manifesto would fall on deaf ears given his own toxic reputation. Meta was recently ordered to pay nearly $1 billion in fines due to its products' harms to children and teens.

"Suffice it to say, Facebook as a product and Zuckerberg as a person are both unpopular with the US public," wrote Brandom. "A recent survey found that 64% of Americans believe social media has been harmful to democracy and a similar percentage believe it should be more heavily regulated, numbers that cut evenly across partisan lines."

People's own past experience with social media, Brandom continued, is a big reason why they are revolting against Big Tech's ambitions to use AI to remake society.

"The public does not trust tech executives to make sure new technologies like this have a positive impact on society," Brandom explained. "Instead of acknowledging that and trying to win back their trust, this essay demonstrates over and over again how the trust was lost in the first place."

Brandom cited Zuckerberg's discussion of human lawyers eventually being replaced by AI as particularly problematic, given that enabling chatbots to engage in litigation could result in a wave of nuisance lawsuits that would clog up the legal system.

"It’s hard to feel calm about any of this stuff," commented Brandom, "and the fact that Zuckerberg isn’t worried makes me more worried."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 2 months ago

“I think that ordinary people don’t trust companies, governments, or the tech industry and always suspect that we are cooking up some new way to screw them over,” wrote Amodei, “That's because we are."

Fixed that for him.

  • source
  • 15 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 39 points 2 months ago

    massive distrust is putting it lightly. that was ten years ago we have since moved to massive hatred

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    That's because they're obviously horrible people who do not have the best interests of the world in mind.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I'm SO glad everyone has caught up on how horrible they are, I remember like 10 years ago, maybe slightly less, posting a comment on reddit that explained the tech bros are authoritarian far right douche nozzles that want to harm society, track everyone, create a techno feudal state and I was inundated with downvotes and comments calling me wrong, crazy, a fear mongerer, and that said I've obviously never worked in tech. - I worked under John S Quarterman and Vint Cerf in the 90s creating maps of networks and of the internet as a whole, I most definitely knew what I was talking about. So glad people don't see them as creative genius techno gods now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Yes indeed it's great they showed all and many caught on.

    I recall there's this threshold on lost trust and then it can also no longer be regained. Forgot what it's called but I really hope we're there.

    Oh that and guillotines are also nice as threat to people fucking it up for all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    How about a distrust of all the big CEOs? The rich need to be reigned in.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    It's hilarious to me that zucerfuck keeps wearing these glasses and trying to make them look cool. It's at least double uncool.

    Edit: Just did some napkin math and it turns out this is actually >= uncool^2.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    Hate them hope they die.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Opposition to Being Shot Goes Beyond Bullets, as Poll Shows Massive Distrust of Murderers

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    massive distrust

    opposition exploded

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    Whaaaattttt... How could you distrust a guy who looks like, um, well, that.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    I think the word would be massive disgust for all CEO's, considering they are unconsensually leading us down a path of self destruction; tech ceo's are just easier to jate because they are all a bunch of weird dweebs aside from evil.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago