It's more noticeable and visceral which is why people are up in arms about it. And rather than downplaying it why not use this as an opportunity to advocate for stringent privacy laws. Because I think you'll find most people do care about the excessive surveillance, they are just not aware of it.

So people are upset about this, but have no trouble with the government tracking where they are and what they are doing 24x7x365.

What are you basng the back half of that statement on? The people complaining about these glasses are also the ones complaining about overreach and surveillance because they are the same thing.

Because all those other cctvs and stuff are owned by companies that don’t want to get sued for posting people’s images non-consensually online. Doesn’t matter if it’s legal to be recorded in public or not. If someone can say a company caused harm because of said imagery, it’s going to be expensive.

Individual people have no problem at all posting these videos and commenting on people they capture, and people viewing that clip will do so as well.

As for the rest; out of sight, out of mind. But even then some take measures to avoid being tracked.

Most people don't care about police/government/corporate surveillance because that's impersonal and doesn't creep them out.

We did have fearmongering when cameraphones first became common in the 2000s, that perverts were going to be using them to secretly photograph people on the train etc. Presumably that did (and still does) happen somewhat, but its not a news story anymore.

PS: For example, "TubeCrush" (won't give them traffic by linking) is a site for women and gay/bi men to post photos of attractive men on the train. (They don't allow men to post photos of women, because that would be wrong, but the other way is apparently completely acceptable)

Who can say what governments will do however when individuals are recording your activities, think pervert or criminal.