Just when you think @ZuckyZuck is finally out of ideas - to steal.

It starts to feel like even a weak LLM like MetaAI is more creative than him.

Maybe we already have created truly artificial intelligence because he is more of an SLM: a Small Language Model?

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
46 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 65 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Please someone explain why if I hack a company I go to jail, but if an AI company does it they get investments

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 3 months ago*

    There's no way possible an AI can hack anyone unless the people running it intended for that to occur or were negligent. Anyone with questions about that should install a copy of LM Studio or Ollama on their PC, download a model, and see how easy it is for the AI to hack someone. It's impossible. Only human intervention can make it possible.

    These stories seem like propaganda intended to get the US government to block usage of open weight models, since they pose an existential threat to the marketshare of expensive closed AI services these companies offer. Open weight models exist in all sizes, from very rudimentary small models to massive near-frontier quality models, and anyone with the tech know-how and a computer able to run them can do so without paying the AI companies or involving the AI companies in any way. It's like Linux for AI.

    It comparable to if Microsoft declared Linux a hacker OS that hackers can use to take down networks. Fear, uncertainty and doubt are the first resort, not last resort, of big companies who know they can't possibly compete with a better alternative.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 62 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Honestly, I don't understand why they opt for these kind of publicity stunts.

    Imagine having a "state of the art" language model that does not follow instructions in enterprise use? Big nope. Even small open weight Chinese language models can follow instructions and not attempt to penetrate through the security of random public services..

    We all know that these things are intentionally guided to do pen testing to multiple services, and whatever goes through is posted on the news.. But why not do something more creative?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 3 months ago* (7 children)

    Uh yeah shuffles papers our uhh Ai did that as well!

    "My Ai just hacked the entire US financial sector then left without a trace, prove it didn't!"

    This is like kids saying Superman could beat Goku in middleschool.

    he could, tho

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    he could, tho

    Yeah, the first time. After Goku trains in the 100x gravity room in the heaven spaceship, I seriously doubt it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (5 children)

    ok goku, you beat me... I do have a finite power limit

    "ha!"

    but I don't!!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    That’s what I haven’t understood about these debates. One of them supposedly has an infinite power source? That means they would win, de facto, no?

    Anything finite is a drop in an endless ocean to anything infinite.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Prime is a different beast. He's still silver-bronze age Superboy, with every bit of rediculous strength the plots of the 70's had to offer. The dude can punch holes in reality and collide planets.

    Goku though just needs a training arc to beat anybody.

    Saitama would be a good one-one for SBP.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    I see. So we’re taking different archetypes of the same character throughout their story progression, and we compare those directly?

    I think I blend all the archetypes to just “Superman” and “Goku” in my head. So it made less sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    'Infinite strength' has weird limits in fiction, but can usually be troped in three big, easy ways. The first is to threaten something that character cares deeply about. He may be invincible, but his world is not.

    The other is to have them at limited potentials of that power, or limit them by their incompetence or inexperience. This is the Matthew Malloy or Scarlet Witch situation, they had/have power but are sometimes written with zero control of that power.

    The last and easiest, is to use abilities that do not depend on strength. Strength is always troped by magic and telepathic users of at least some skill. Can't kill what you're fighting? Teleport it to hell! Trick its mind into fighting someone else. Trick it into thinking there's nothing wrong, or Charles Xavier's method, 'you sleep now'.

    Though there are sometimes limits to that. See - The Hulk.

    "He's too angry! His mind is madness!"

    No idea why they never think of just levitating him. He can't smash if he can't get to the ground.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago

    This might be the most pathetic thing he's done yet

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

    Am I just stupid for not believing that any of the models actually did any of that on their own? I feel like the companies behind them start claiming crazy shit like this every time people start questioning "AI" more and/or losing interest. Isn't that how OpenAI dropped Sora amidst the dwindling hype to keep the investors hooked? Now it's back to scary stories about "AI" being so good and advanced that it's about to hack everything and what, actually think for itself?

    There is no X big enough for me to press to doubt this enough.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

    It's not clear what you mean when you say "on their own". It wasn't like the LLM was idle and randomly decided to start hacking. At least for the OpenAI one, it was being tested and given a task, and it determined that part of accomplishing that task was hacking another server. It was supposed to be isolated in a secure "sandbox" not connected to the internet, but found a vulnerability in some software running in the sandbox and broke out.

    Edit: I should add that there are credible accusations that these companies are intentionally making it possible to break out of their test environments for publicity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    What you're describing is exactly what I'm wondering. Maybe I'm just not too deep into the topic, but it seems so arbitrary to me that they went with the whole isolation thing in the first place for no reason that I can see, other than the "oh no, it's hacking stuff!" narrative being pre-planned and orchestrated for.

    In other words, I am siding with the accusations of this whole wave of "AI" suddenly hacking into stuff, with different models from different companies wondrously doing the same thing one after another, being a publicity stunt that one company started and others, as they do, copying just to stay relevant.

    Although I feel like maybe I'm going Chuck McGill here because I am very biased.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    The models are tested, among other things, on their ability to turn vulnerabilities into exploits. The OpenAI scenario was exactly this.

    It is a very wise practice to test these things in isolation, especially when you're telling it to hack.

    I'm not completely sold on it being a publicity stunt, personally. The law was broken by these models, and I don't believe these companies want to start people and politicians asking the question about who is culpable when an AI breaks the law.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Sort of. What they want is no responsibility “wow we didn’t tell it to do that explicitly!” And to convince the public and government officials that “AI is actually really dangerous, so please ban all the foreign competitors on grounds of national security (totally unrelated to our potential lack of earnings and their ability to offer 98% the product for 1% the cost).”

    So still most likely publicity stunt. A reproducible one, done only by the largest domestic ones precisely because they are not worried about the question of who is culpable if a law is broken, because they didn’t tell it explicitly to do it and also they still have a couple piles of circular cash they can use on bribes, which may be their only path to keeping the grift train going. They’re in no way in danger of being held accountable here, they do worse things everyday, and their concern is making money, full stop. They will lie cheat and steal their way through circular finance deals, bribes, extortions, anticompetitive behavior, marketing stunts, propaganda, and backroom deals as much as they can to accomplish that goal. When you understand their actions through that lens, well, things like this make sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    Zuckerberg: “my AI is cool, too…”

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    These motherfuckers should be sitting in jail cells right now.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    MY AI is more dangerous and out of control than your AI.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    The only thing it tells me is that they do not have their cybersecurity in order.

    Therefore wouldn't want to use a product of those companies.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Yup. And it's an embarrassment to see. At this point anyone who has done the bare minimum in actual security work can run intellectual rings around any of these tech bros.

    They're not geniuses when it comes to real-world application, just moneyed dreamers so immensely out of touch with the real world they don't even know the basics of the industry they claim to be innovators in.

    Meanwhile, those of us who are even superficially acquainted with the basics see it immediately, like you did and so many in this thread. It's the same old thing of peddlers of tech not actually having to know their tech as long as they know just enough to sell it to those corporate IT decision makers who also don't know their tech.

    I cannot wait for this tower of shit to collapse under its own weight.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Ok from my understanding of this “hacking” is it more than prompt injections in text files?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    From my limited understanding, OpenAi's "agent' was given a set of tasks to complete and heavily incentivized (how ever they do that?) to solve the problems it was given. The Ai was put in a sandbox environment with some limited network stuff like printers connected but no actual access to the open internet. The Ai somehow used the network to access the internet and breached some protected sites from Huggingface. Im fairly certain that the Ai had credentials and access for things in huggingface already and didn't hack those but just used them once free. The caveat here, is that the engineers set this up and the LEFT for the day only to find out later that it had breached the sandbox.
    This is what OpenAi claims happened to them. Meta is just saying theirs did too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    More specifically, they were running a benchmark in a """isolated sandbox""" (sorry, but if the computer is physically connected to the internet, it's not isolated), and the model escalated permissions in order to look up answers for the benchmark online, which were hosted at the hugging face's website.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Printer network access is one of the oldest tricks in the books. They didn't really try to sandbox it if they gave it access to a printer (especially since it's task didn't even require a printer).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    It's true. My very own AI has hacked OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta like a year ago and is now starting to hack other companies. Please invest in my business! /s

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Reads like an onion headline

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    "... oh yeah? Well that's nothing. MY dad is the head of Xbox! Uh-huh! I swear!"

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    This entire storyline just have so much "my dad is stronger than your dad" type energy...

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Meta AI is CEO of AI!

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    I kinda love this because it shows both how uninventive and useless meta is, but it also clarifies just how much the earlier situations were also just publicity stunts.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    @madeindex funny how noone gets jailed with that excuse…takes notes #sarcasm #commentary #USpol #shitpost #GAFAMs #crime #hacking #malware

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    @madeindex no AI wants to be left behind...engadget.com/2232256/chinese-a

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Sigh

    If you had read the situation, you would find that the information news outlet reported this first, then the media talked about it then Meta admit this in news statements. (They didn't even release a blog/press release).

    While I don't rule out that it's a publicity stunt, I think it's very unlikely. Otherwise I would call Meta terrible at marketing because they are not loud about it at all.

    In my opinion, OpenAI accident has triggered a wave of scans among AI companies to discover any problems before they get hold liable for damages by the hacked company and to solve them internally.

    That's how I read the situation as of 7th of August. My opinion might change, if any new info came out that seem sus.

  • source
  • 4 comments in c/news@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    Until AI releases the Epstein Files, it hasn't hacked shit. It's not even as impressive as 4Chan celebrating every time anonymous put goatse on a website for thirty minutes.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    None of them did. This is the stupidest marketing campaign ever so that we believe the gibberish-generating slot machines are actually intelligent.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    I'm deeply skeptical of the claims that OpenAI and Anthropic are making already. All their claims of "somebody stop us" just seems like a great way to pump up the interest in them.

    As for Meta....LOOL.

  • source
  • 3 comments in c/technology@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 19 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    This is so childish I wanna laugh out loud but my sadness and anger supress it.

    What a shitshow the world has become.
    It's being run by selfish, idiotic, inhumane children. It always has, but I think we're at a peak currently.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    it always has, but the issue now is that these mfs have a platform where they can perform and be noticed even more as these infants dressed in suits. i long the day we incarcerate these bastards and expropriate their stolen work.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    The Zuck failed again? Good! Fuck that guy. Just chuck it on the pile along with Meta's pervert glasses, Meta's Libra cryptocurrency, Meta's Metaverse and just Meta in general.

  • source
  • 1 comment in c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 3 points 3 months ago
    1 comment in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Anyone consider that he let the ai write the copy, and theyre showing symptoms of being trained on the other company's press releases?

  • source