The Democratic mayor of Kansas City, Missouri was among those celebrating what he called the "TOTAL repudiation by Missouri voter of a core agenda of state GOP leadership" on Tuesday night after the state voted by a 60-point margin against Amendment 4, a measure backed by the Republican governor which would have weakened voters' ability to pass citizen-sponsored ballot initiatives.

"We took over control of the state of Missouri tonight, repudiating absolutely atrocious ideas," Mayor Quinton Lucas said in a video message addressing voters as election results came in. "Against millions of dollars, lots of special interests, Missouri voters are trouncing Amendment 4, which was going to take away our initiative petition rights, eliminate our ability to make sure we can get things done."

The Republican supermajority in the state Legislature and Gov. Mike Kehoe supported Amendment 4, which was spurred by the passage of a ballot initiative in 2024 that had added the right to abortion care to the Missouri Constitution.

The addition of the amendment to the constitution would have required a majority vote in each of the state's eight congressional districts in order to pass any future citizen-sponsored amendments, instead of a simply majority of voters across the state.

With more than 95% of votes counted on Wednesday morning, 80.3% of voters had rejected Amendment 4, while 19.7% had supported it.

The amendment would have created the highest threshold in the country for passing ballot initiatives like others that Missourians have passed in recent years, including ones that have legalized marijuana, raised the minimum wage, and expanding Medicaid coverage.

Opponents warned that under Amendment 4, an initiative could fail to pass even with as many as 95% of voters across the state supporting it.

The St. Louis American reported that the election result could signal voters' coming rejection of Amendment 3 in November, which would ban abortion in Missouri in most cases.

The state GOP suffered a similar defeat for Amendment 5, which would have gradually eliminated the state's income tax and replaced it with expanded sales and use taxes. Opponents warned the new tax scheme would have cost working families and lower-income Missourians more, with the average resident paying $500 more in taxes annually, according to the nonpartisan Missouri Budget Project—as high-income residents would have been required to contribute less to public spending.

“Tonight’s rejection of Amendment 5 is not only an immense failure for statewide leadership, but also a sign to out-of-state billionaire special interests that Missourians and most Americans have no interest in voodoo tax schemes that would spare civic responsibility for a few elites while raising costs on hardworking families in our state and our country,” Lucas said Tuesday night.

Mark Jones of the Missouri National Education Association—part of a broad coalition that opposed the amendment—told the Missouri Independent that "fundamentally, Missourians rejected the idea that they should pay for tax breaks for billionaires and then not be able to change to correct the legislature, not only on this issue but forever."

The Independent reported that Missouri Promise political action committee (PAC), which did not report any contributions from individual donors, raised $17.2 million in favor of Amendment 5. Opponents of Amendment 5 were outspent 4-to-1 on broadcast ads.

Another PAC, Protect Election Integrity, raised $132,100 and spent $28,653 through July 23 in support of Amendment 4. Freedom Principle Missouri/Missouri First PAC, also reported spending $45,551 in support of the measure.

State House Minority Leader Ashley Aune (D-14) said Missouri voters had "made clear they won’t let Republicans rewrite the rules to protect their own power and line the pockets of the ultrawealthy."

Referring to the abortion rights amendment that will be up for a vote in the general election, Aune added, "In November, voters have the chance to send another powerful message to Jefferson City Republicans: If you mess with Missourians’ rights, you will pay the political price.”


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
23 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
[–] 52 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Goddamn, an 80/20 split is pretty big. I'm sure there have been bigger, but I can't imagine that many.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    All 4 amendments in Missouri were hugely decisive and actually went the way a sane person would want it to go.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Just waiting for Amendment 3 this November. Last go around, it enshrined the right to reproductive care/abortions. The opponents ran giant billboards, "NO ON 3, STOP MINOR TRANSGENDER SURGERY!" Despite nothing in the wording even mentioning trans folk.

    This time, passing 3 would both prohibit abortion and the non-existent protections for minor transgender surgery - so I guess at least this time the billboards screaming "YES ON 3! STOP MINOR TRANSGENDER SURGERY!" are technically correct (but still hella misleading).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    You'd think those would be two separate amendments anyhow, but not in US politics.

    Instead you get things like "vote yes to increase taxes on the wealthy and also start killing kittens"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 3 months ago* (4 children)

    The interesting thing about 2026 is everyone knows we're getting fucked. But people don't seem to accurately assess who is fucking them the worst, or identify what do when both major parties are fucking us. But even republicans, when asked "do you want to give these tyrants more power over us?" will say no.

    In such times, ballot initiatives, despite their flaws, remain an incredibly important tool for reigning in authoritarianism.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Man I'd rather be getting fucked by democrats right now.

    We could continue fighting for positive change and not be fighting for our lives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 months ago

    So now the GOP locked-down MO gubment ignores it, right?

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I'm proud of those people, this is Missouri

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago

    Huh, a large majority of voters want voters to be able to vote? Weird.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago

    Chris Stigall is so gross. I can't stand his fat fake face

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Also https://apnews.com/article/missouri-election-2026-primary-5226443026ad3b9a3e9a5979abb910a9

    JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — U.S. Rep. Wesley Bell won Tuesday’s rematch in the Missouri Democratic primary against former Rep. Cori Bush, an outspoken activist who had been part of a progressive group of House members known as the Squad...

    As was the case in the last campaign, Bell was backed by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, which lobbies for U.S. support of Israel. Bush has denounced Israel’s military action in Gaza...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Yeah was sad to hear about Bush losing to Bell again. Had I been in the district I would have voted for her. KC gets enough shit from the ignorant led poisoned rural areas. And that's still nothing compared to the BS STL has to deal with.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Mo has a history of keeping initiative system alive and using it for left leaning policy while continuing to put gop officials in charge of everything. I wouldn't read too much into this.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Gerrymandering and rigging is rampant. If voting was made equitable and accessible across the state. Things would be quite a bit different. Up here in the Northland of Kansas city. The polling places are often well staffed with plenty of places to vote. If you go down south Staffing gets a lot sketchier and the amount of places to vote goes down while the amount of people using those fewer places goes up. It's All By Design. Meanwhile rural areas you just wander in any time of day you want to go vote there's almost never a wait.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    The interesting part about this was that it would still allow the lawmakers to use the old (easier) method, while regular citizens would be forced to use the new (harder) method. So the lawmakers know this new system would be harder, and specifically created a carve-out for themselves.

  • source