Any of the original Star Wars trilogy films.
post
I might say Donnie Darko as the Director's Cut may complicate the movie a bit for those who prefer the mystery of the theatrical one.
Leon, The Professional. Besson is a creep.
How does it differ from the original movie? I tried looking it up but I couldn’t find any notes on that. The “International” version seems to be longer. Of course, one of the top results is a Reddit thread where I scroll down and immediately see an “um akshully it’s ephebophelia” comment, which is on-brand for Reddit.
That's pretty much it. They trimmed the sexualization of Portman's character in the theatrical release. The director's cut put it back in. It changes the relationship from flawed underworld father she never had figure, to attempted lover. Jean Reno refused some scenes and forced Beson to take a milder direction then even that as he wanted to go lolita in the film.
I don't remember the differences (and there aren't many) but Ridley Scott himself was asked to make a "director's cut" of Alien for the Blu-ray release and he did... But he said something along the lines of "It was hard to figure out what to change. The theatrical cut already is the director's cut. I made it the way I wanted it to be the first time around."
The director's cut of Alien is terrible. All they do is put in more shots of the xenomorph and that ruins the movie in two ways:
-
The reason Alien works so well is you barely see the alien at all. The build up to the end is incredibly good, and
-
The shots that were inserted make it clear it's just a dude in a rubber suit. The alien changes from something to be feared to something to be laughed at.
Speaking of Ridley Scott, Bladerunner had many different versions iirc. Might be a candidate
Deadpool 2.
Theatrical jokes are better.
Gladiator. The director's cut adds a lot of unnecessary content, which just messes up the pacing of the movie. And sadly, the theatrical cut is hard to come by (impossible?) in HD format.
And sadly, the theatrical cut is hard to come by (impossible?) in HD format.
4K isn't HD though. Maybe they like smaller file sizes or didn't have a need for 4K.
The theatrical cut is also available on the regular 1080p Blu-ray.
Since it's available on Blu-ray, surely someone must have remuxed and encoded it by now. I mean, the Scene guys had to source the movie from somewhere, right?
Bladerunner.
They took out the music. Like WTF?
Although there are like 3 or 4 different cuts. Not sure if it was technically the Director's Cut.
The latest one "The final cut" is supposed to be the directots cut. It's really good.
anything Zack Snyder gets his hands on. literally anything. he'll take an ok theatrical release and then turn into 3 hours of sheer boredom.
Star Trek VI. The director's cut interrupts the extremely dramatic mind-meld interrogation scene with another obnoxious flashback every time a character is implicated. I suppose between releases the director must have lost faith in his audience's ability to follow the story without having their hands held.
“Directed by William Shatner” basically tells you all you need to know.
And anyone brave enough to watch the director’s cut, is boldly going where no man has gone before…and returned with their sanity intact.
Stargate. The director's cut tried to add to much plot, and the best bits by a mile were the action scenes!
Empire Records. The directors cut tries to make Rex Manning a more sympathetic character but it just works better with him as a villain.
I don't know as to whether Rex was really a villain. He was just an arsehole.
Mitchell, however, was a prick from top to bottom.
I see them both as representative of faces of capitalism. Mitchell is a leech. His father created the business and did useful work but all Mitchell just consumes. Rex and Musictown represent the corporatization of music. Rex isn't an artist, he is a product being sold.
TIL there was a director's cut of Empire Records...
I must have watched that movie a dozen times when I was younger and absolutely loved it. Just goes to show that not every movie needs a director's cut.
I am assuming that you are lumping extended cuts, special editions and all non-theatrical release versions under the broad category of “Director’s Cut”.
Also to echo what Onomatopoeia posted, all of them.
With all of that said, I have found every Director’s Cut of James Cameron films to be worse than their theatrical counterparts.
Cameron tried to clean up the ending of The Abyss and just made it more silly than the theatrical version.
The additional stuff he added about Ripley having a kid in Aliens wasn’t bad, it was just unnecessary as was the stuff with Newt’s family finding the ship. All of that just messed with the paceing of the movie. Also there is a scene with auto machine guns that has made it into “edited for TV” versions that really don’t belong.
All the stuff he added to Terminator 2 was meh.
I am not going to comment on the Avatar non-theatrical cuts as people love to bitch about those movies.
Cameron is a very focused strong director and it is easy to see why the stuff left out of the theatrical versions of his movies wound up on the “editing room floor”.
The theatrical cut of Legend, by Ridley Scott, has an awesome prog rock soundtrack.
The director's cut has some generic fantasy movie musical noodling.
It's not even close.
I swore that was the case but i honestly didn't by find much on it.
Iirc there's also a different release between the US and Europe separate from a director's cut. I remember the plot being way different between the versions I watched, and not just via music choice.
shit, i need to look into this because I remember loving Legend back in the day
Mallrats. The extended cut is just awful and Kevin Smith agrees.
I remember seeing a print release of the Clerks and Chasing Amy screenplays that had an intro by Kevin Smith. He talked about how the reception of Mallrats was really disappointing because the general thrust of most reviews was “how dare he sell out like this?” But there was one review that said “it’s clear Smith loves slapstick comedy but he just doesn’t know how to direct it.” He felt like that was a review of the movie and not of the movement he was imagined to be part of.
And now you can only find the garbage extended cut as a download online. I had to download like 12 different torrents just to watch the real movie.
It's funny I was gonna mention Mallrats and came across your comment.
100%, I didn't even know this existed and it took a long time to find the right version again
Justice League
The theatrical Justice League has two things going for it: brevity, and Batman's "just save one" mentor moment with The Flash, which was nice.
Everything else about Snyder's cut is better. It looks better, it sounds better, each scene in isolation plays better, it has fewer cringy jokes. Most importantly, it retains Cyborg's story arc, which it turns out was the heart of the whole damn movie.
Oh, to me both were bad and, generally speaking, I've been overdosing on superhero movies, it just never stops and each one is even more slopish than the last. I just remember the director's cut of this one leaving me even more apathetic than the theatre cut, when we were promised that it would make more sense, be more interesting, etc. It was not. The superhero slop has to stop.
If you aren't having a good time either way, the theatrical's 90 minute running time is a huge advantage. But then you should probably just walk away, rather than try again with a 4 hour cut. I enjoyed Snyder's version well enough once, but I'll likely never rewatch it just because of the time investment required.
Oh no, I'd die before I pay to watch an american movie. I just need background noise when I'm working on my computer. A movie is good when it actually grabs my attention away from what I'm doing. Both versions did not.
Oh no, I’d die before I pay to watch an american movie.
Glad to hear it, the less money being sent to that country the better. The only money I've given to any film or TV for the past year or more has been to CBC Gem and BritBox.
I imagine most movies would suck if I watched them the way you do, though. Podcasts or talking head YouTubers are my preference for choring background.
If I may, I'd like to recommend the animated movie Justice League: War (2014). It's basically a shorter version of JL17 and ZSJL, all three films are adapted from the same comic. Of the three, this is the best.
How??? The Snyder cut wasn't anything to write home about but the theatrical cut was terribly boring.
Alien 3. Though technically not an actual director’s cut (which is bad in and of itself), the assembly cut was sold as being the the next best thing.
But imo its a sloppy version of the film. The ox scene was nonsensical and unnecessary, the ending scene was ruined with bad fx and bad scoring and I disliked the overal pacing.
Its like someone just swapped out a bunch of scenes and went "There ya go, all better now!"
The Legacy cut is imo the best version of the film.
I also prefer the theatrical cut of Aliens. The relationship between Ripley and Newt is just enough. The director's cut mashes the maternal relationship button too hard. Seeing a little bit more with the colonists is nice, but doesn't make up for the other imbalances.
Wow, that’s a good point actually.
The special edition has pretty much been the standard for home video ever since they released the Alien Trilogy Boxset in 1997.
Meaning I also haven’t actually watched the Theatrical Cut since at least 1997 🤐
Cameron recently hinted at a 3D re-release following the 40th anniversary, but the movie itself hasn’t aged as well as Alien and I won’t even mention the issues with the 4K ‘remaster.
I prefer The Assembly Cut
What about the Assembly Cut did you enjoy most?
Here’s a good summary of the differences
https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/alien-3-comparing-the-assembly-cut-to-the-theatrical-cut/
All versions of this movie suck.
In my experience, all of them.
The directors cut isn't about watching the movie itself, but examining the process of producing a film - dissecting it.
Two different experiences.
The director's cut for Blade Runner is a massive improvement on the theatrical version because it removes the narration the studio forced in. A lot of director's cuts include a few scenes that make a movie work when they were cut or changed to meet some silly studio meddling.
Which one?
There are 7 of them.
I'd argue that James Cameron's "The Abyss" director's cut is superior to the theatrical. The extra 25min introduces some extra plot details in the climax that really flesh out the ending
The theatrical cut of Dark City assumes the audience is an idiot and spoils the movie's plot twist with an unnecessary opening narration.
all 82 comments