all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 30 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Another attack on device ownership if this leads to all-out firmware locks

  • source
  • [–] 46 points 3 months ago

    They can’t stop funding genocide, but they can do this.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago

    It simply isn't open source, if it does.

    The full system includes ALL necessary components to perform a real age verification.

    Mobile wallet, "identity provider" software, and all necessary hardware to run both.

    The assumption with general purpose computing machines WAS that hardware didn't matter, that's why open source software could succeed. If it does matter, then of course the hardware needs to be open as well.

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 3 months ago

    Haha, look Ma! Fascism is everywhere!

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago

    There is also a separate governance limitation. Proof of Age providers are expected to issue credentials only to applications included in a list of compliant apps maintained by the European Commission. This means that publishing the source code does not automatically guarantee that a community-built version can use the real service.

    This incompatible with GPLv3? Because pivotization not allowed anymore and this sound similar concept.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Optimistically, age can be verified without giving away identity. There are cryptographic methods for doing so. And I'm sure this is how the age verification mandate will initially be sold.

    But after the populace gets used to the idea of age verification, the government can easily get rid of all the cryptography involved. "For the kids"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    That's very very optimistically. They won't care a shit. Who understands cryptography enough to be swayed over to the bad side anyways? And those who do understand it, will most probably know that even if technically it could work, it won't.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I am owed SEVERAL APOLOGIES.
    I could tag you all, but I rather see honest people admit they were wrong.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    How does this initiative have anything to do with those who live outside the Fascist Union?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    What's the point of these links? I understand that age verification is a global trend, but I'll ask again. How does this specific hardware attestation initiative has anything to do with non-EU citizens?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Because all the chip manufacturers will comply respectively as their markets will force them to implement these fascist hardware locks🔒. No buyers for freed chips, no market to sell molds to. This is the final piece🧩 to absolute fascist domination: all the capital is forced to play with the monopsonists.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Why are we doing age checks again? I still don't understand

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • 83 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.ml view that post
    4 comments in c/stallmanwasright@programming.dev view that post
    4 comments in c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    3 comments in c/android@lemmy.world view that post
    2 comments in c/DeclineIntoCensorship@lemmy.dbzer0.com view that post
    1 comment in c/linux@sopuli.xyz view that post