Or launder them by asking for big bills from the bank, and having them broke up later by spending them. That way you don’t have to believe the joke that data can’t be held more than 6 months.
post
Alternatively:

Really feel like its time we shifted currencies up a bit tbh.
So UK currently is £50 (almost non existent) £20 £10 and £5 notes, £2 £1 50p 20p 10p 5p 2p 1p coins.
Drop the 1/2p coins and £5/10 note, add a £5/10 coin and actually print the £50 notes in meaningful quantities, probably add a £100 note too.
Indeed coins are great for privacy. Too bad ATMs don’t dispense them.
(update) correction.. some do.
So if I withdraw $500 to buy a used bicycle, and the new owner goes and buys a bunch of fertilizer, and the farm supply store deposits the cash at the bank, the FBI is going to show up at my house?
I just use my debit card. That way there's no cash to track!
I don’t know if banks generally scan inbound cash that’s deposited over the counter. But if the farm supply store subscribes to a armored car security service to pickup the cash, then the security service would scan the serial numbers and enter the farm supply store as the source.
The evidence would not be strong enough to make an arrest but targetting you for extra surveillance seems likely enough IMO.
It wouldn't be tied to a transaction though would it? Just enough to suggest you may have made a transaction of some kind at that location.
Still, seems like just holding the money may not be enough. Try to swap it. £500 you took out 6 months ago all got spent in the same place, that is probably still your money. If it was £80 of yours, £140 of Johns, £200 of Freds and £80 of Beths, now its far harder to know. Plus its mixed in with so many other transactions as well.
More people swapping notes would also further reduce the value of that kind of surveillance.
all 18 comments