39
Wikimedia staff in the US have formed a trade union, but the foundation has refused to recognise it (mezha.ua)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/world
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 11 points 3 months ago

This and the sloppers contracting with them is why you should hold off on donations.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    I guess Wikipedia lived long enough to be the villain. Dark times.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    8 comments in c/technology@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Should make for a spicy secion on wikipedias own history page, eh?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 27 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Not too spicy, but they at least acknowledge it.

    On 27 July, WMF declined to voluntarily recognize the US union. WMF stated that the union would need to pursue a formal NLRB election procedure. 404 Media viewed the WMF's 27 July statement as using "very carefully-worded language common among companies and organizations that have fought against unionization".

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_and_unions

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
    • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I might be mistaken, but aren't Wikipedia's origins in objectivism? It would make sense if so for the foundation to oppose a trade union (in no way am I saying they are in the right though).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Uh, what? The Ayn Rand garbage philosophy? I've never heard that and don't see how that jibes with a free, crowd sourced encyclopedia...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Jimmy Wales is an objectivist- he moderated online forums related to Ayn Rand before he started Nupedia and Wikipedia.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    Yeah the founder is or was into that. Thus the idea that Wikipedia's editorial decisions could essentially be made by algorithms. I have some jokes about it but will spare you for now. The WMF itself is just another tech company with some nonprofit virtue vibes though. Expect a typical campaign.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • 4 comments in c/world@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    So are they going to do the NLRB election or no? Isn't that the normal process?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    It is... They probably don't want to have a class that omits some managers or something.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 3 months ago* (1 child)
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    I don't know anything about that law firm, but secret-ballot election conducted by the National Labor Relations Board is the appropriate path forward. Chaining that it's not and blaming the foundation for that is a certain kind of mental gymnastics that doesn't make sense

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent