all 97 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 168 points 1 year ago (2 children)

wouldn't this evaporate extremely quick though?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 147 points 1 year ago (10 children)
  • [–] 58 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    supercritical helium does some really weird shit, I'd call this one plausible.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    that's a pretty good point, it's literally trapped between being a liquid and a gas. If this was BattleBots, they'd let it compete once and then ban it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    "Trapped between liquid and gas" is kind of the opposite of what a supercritical fluid is. It's more that gas and liquid states are "trapped" in a region of phase space, while supercritical fluids exist in the place where the demarcation between the two no longer exists (which is usually a far larger region than where it does).

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)
  • [–] 43 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    at least it wouldn’t wet your socks. i think capillary action relies on surface tension

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    It relies on differences in surface tension. If a liquid has a lower surface tension (energy) towards one surface than another, you get the typical capillary effect. In the case of water, the water-air energy is lower than the water- energy, so you get a capillary effect.

    If water had exactly zero surface tension against every interface,

    • it would not exhibit any capillary action
    • life on earth would cease to exist quite quickly
    • your socks would remain dry
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago* (2 children)

    life on earth would cease to exist quite quickly

    This was the first thought that came to my mind on seeing this post.

    For starters, basicaly most (all?) land based plants are fucked, they can no longer internally hydrate, also water in soil behaves totally differently, so ...yeah.

    (oh on that note, snap your fingers and water has 0 surface tension? time for a lot of landslides/sinkholes in humid areas)

    Then you've got beings with active circulatory systems, who... may to some extent be able to live, but lots of pulmonary / circulatory problems are gonna happen.

    I guess maybe totally waterborne life could survive, maybe... but 0 surface tension of water probably changes how salinity works...

    Yeah, this would be very bad, lol.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 1 year ago* (9 children)

    I think that's part of our anthropic bias, not sure we'd be alive without water's surface tension in order to observe this.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (8 children)

    Well cells wouldn’t be circle shaped, but would it actually be to the detriment of life in that or other ways?

    Maybe cells could take a more pragmatic shape, like tactical dicks

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I think that could make some life-supporting chemical reactions difficult to happen, but I'm not qualified to judge that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don’t, not that I am qualified to say so either! The larger surface area might be beneficial for osmosis!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Trees wouldn’t exist, so life would definitely look different.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It'd evaporate much quicker TBF. Although that also means that the BP would be much lower and tea and coffee wouldn't be a thing and boiling wouldn't be a reliable method of cooking. although on the flip side, you could increase the strength of alcoholic beverages by boiling the water off instead of distilling the alcohol.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Yep. Generally if one property of it was so different, I'd expect many others to be different as a result of that too. So physics and chemistry as we know them (with so many things relying on water) wouldn't exist. And thinking further how life on Earth started off in the water...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago

    It would instead instantly make it extremely obvious how uneven my floor is.

  • source
  • [+] 27 points 1 year ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Bold of you to assume my floor is level.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    At 2 micrometers, it’s going to evaporate too fast for there to be a puddle thin film of water.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    This reminds me of the person that suggested in a response to a request for ADHD “life-hacks” where they would wet one of their socks before starting a specific high-importance task and could not take it off until the specified task was completed.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    Well if water didn't have its unique properties of cohesion and adhesion we likely wouldn't be here anyways.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    look....I'm just glad roaches don't have sharp teeth and spiders can't fly.

    let's stop while we're ahead

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    When some spiders are born, sometimes hundreds at a time, they cast little parachute webs and ride the wind to wherever they might go.

    Palmetto bugs are like mean flying roaches that bite.

    You’ll never escape the horrors of the beauty in nature.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    We would not have life! Water is a polar molecule that is very different from most other liquids. Its the specific surface tension properties that help to create life. The reason why we search for planets with water. We've never worked out a way for any life to exists without the amazing H2O.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Now imagine what wonders we could have if there were a few other quicky molecules.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    What if it just applied to chlorinated tap water then

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    As an odd thought experiment or are we hoping that the laws of physics might be different there? All water, except brand new in reaction space is almost certainly going to contain dissolved ions

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago

    Well I think the idea is more that for some reason water needs to be treated with something that removes surface tension if you want to safely pipe it to people's houses. At least that shouldn't destroy all life.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    The water would react similarly to alcohol. Yes, the puddle would be bigger but it would evaporate faster.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    That would actually be a very useful tool for machinists. I think it would make it much easier to find out how non-flat something is

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (10 children)

    Can we make liquids like that? Sounds useful in some situations.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    Yes and no. No surface tension implies vanishing intermolecular forces, so the liquid would not be cohesive and would expand in all directions to the volume of the room... which is pretty much the definition of a gas. Not quite though: supercritical fluids also do this as long as temperature and pressure remain high enough, and are indeed useful in niche applications industrially.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    You can not "make" a given liquid like that but there are some liquids with low surface tension. From the back of my head I remember the Avogadro experiment, but to lazy to look it up. What I recall is that he "counted" the amount of particles in a drop of oil because it forms a mini layer of lying on top of water. You might notice when you drop a bit of oil in water, that it always creates a giant puddle.

    Back to the original post: that thin layer of water would just evaporated instantly

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    So it would actually be more practical, don't need to mop it up if it evaporates.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago*

    This is how science fiction is made! Special Meta materials are very under-explored, It seems reasonable that in a future high tech society they would be increasingly common.

    Mostly we get “faster engines” and “advanced computermachines that sometimes perform unexplained magic”

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago* (4 children)

    wouldn't it also be impossible to drink? The water would just seep out of any cup and find the path of least resistance to the floor

    At least with oil you can just raw dog the nozzle and squeeze it directly in, guzzling down those calories by the gallon at least until the attendant starts to run over, but by then you pull out your lighter threateningly and shake your head until he backs off again

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    You can add a wetting agent to water to decrease the surface tension

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I read that in Meatwad’s voice.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Now think about what would happen if ice didn't float.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    I'm not a geologist, but I'm imagine that the deep ocean would be a colossal underwater glacier, with intermixed sedimentary layers. Kind of like what we have with methane hydrate deposits, only much, much deeper. The super-deep ocean simply wouldn't exist, and we might not even know about the Mariana Trench, or a lot of other sea floor features. Also, it's possible a different proportion of the world's water would be frozen in this way.

    With ice as a part of the sea floor, it would also interact with subduction zones at continental edges. That might push a LOT more superheated water into volcanoes, faults, and everywhere else water could go. That would probably make for a lot more geysers in such areas, and volcanic eruptions would be far more energetic.

    The trajectory of human history and technology would also be changed. There might have been fewer ice bridges between continents during the last ice age. Ice-skating wouldn't become as common a thing until we get refrigeration. Harvesting ice in the winter would require bodies of water to freeze solid first, making it impractical except in shallow areas.

    I'm also going to wager that glaciers would behave differently too. I don't know enough about their dynamics, but I wonder if having meltwater on the bottom helps lubricate their movements somewhat. Kind of like a lava flow, only slower. Inverting that relationship might make glaciers far less mobile.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Hmm, might small bodies of water, say pusdle to pond size, still freeze from the top down because of exposure to colder air and above freezing earth? If the top freezes over all at once it might stay on top unless something breaks it and allows water to flow from under to over

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    We're 60% water and not really water-tight as it is.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Only Rick Sanchez can make a floor that level, and then only 1 square meter.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    we also wouldn't have icicles :(

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Would that mean that if you jumped into the Atlantic you'd just fall to the bottom? Or would that be due to buoyancy or something

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    I love this comment section

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    if we lived in a high pressure environment, this totally would happen.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    I hate when I spill some oil or soapy water and it does this

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Ever spilled a drop of diesel? Exactly that happens

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Would it still be possible to have a shower?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Then your cells would die and plants wouldn't exist

  • source
  • That response goes so hard. Why is it that shitposts bring our the hardest lines?

  • source