1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

That’s cool I guess. I fucking hate the company but it’s nice to see a larger company support these “niche” OS’

  • source
  • 8 comments in c/graphene_os@lemmy.sdf.org view that post
    [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    For power-users: Are all third-party ROMs blocked?

    No. We currently support GrapheneOS when the bootloader is locked. We may support other third-party ROMs if:

    • They do not break the AOSP security model,
    • They support installation with a locked bootloader,
    • They properly configure and publish self-signed verified boot keys for their ROM, and
    • They promptly update to the latest AOSP patch level. We frequently update minimum operating system security requirements.

    If ROMs do not consistently adhere to the standards above, we will remove them from the set of supported verified boot keys.

    A lot of ifs, but I guess it's a beginning?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Oh look, a pedophile app trying to save face. Fuck em.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Thats pretty cool, stick fuck Roblox

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Don't want em

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    That's...so far from something I was worried about, as GrapheneOS user.

    I guess it's nice they did the legwork to set nuanced permissions, according to actual use cases. It would be great if that could catch on.

  • source
  • [+] 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)