Elon Musk announced the entire codebase of X/Twitter will be going open source

Source: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2077361679034118271

Nitter bridge: https://nitter.privacyredirect.com/elonmusk/status/2077361679034118271#m

#opensource #twitter

top 38 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 92 points 3 months ago (1 child)

So the only thing you can confidently say based on this information is: it's 100% certain the entire codebase of Twitter will not be going open source.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 58 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Let's add it to the list of lies:

    • musk is a "free speech absolutist"
    • FSD next year!
    • E2EE chats in Xitter

    Keep it going!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 months ago

    You mean like last time when the whole world found out he added special privileges depending if the poster was Democrat, Republican or Elon Musk?

    https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/03/twitter-posts-the-code-it-claims-determines-which-tweets-people-see-and-why/

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago

    An open source piece of shit is still a piece of shit

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago

    That's a pretty cool thing to do. But it's disingenuous how he goes "don't trust anything that isn't open source" after having operated multiple businesses based on closed-source software for years. Wonder if he will also open up the code for Teslas...

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    I'm pretty sure only the frontend will release but no server code will be released.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    No thanks, you can keep it.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    If it's not a lie, it's not worth it anyway, we have better things now. I do love the boot lickers who want to help him though.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    This just a ploy to feed Grok.

    Also their code isn't valuable. I want to see the algorithms and admins logs and bots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    isn't the algorithm part of the code? or is that split off into a separate repo?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    this is the idiot that took down twitter when he yeeted racks out of a data center and threw 'em into a u-haul.. ones that were still powered on and used by the site. so anything's possible... but i don't think even he would be so stupid as to release the algorithms or his special 'tweaks' to them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago

    The uber-rich are jumping onto the opensource bandwagon due to the hype. Just wait. They don't understand a thing about the philosophy but "free". Free labor, free publicity, and a better public image for free.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (10 children)

    So people will be able to fork it and add ActivityPub integration? :D

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    Why not Mastodon instead though?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (6 children)

    I don't understand? Isn't Mastodon a subset of ActivityPub?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Yes, Mastodon uses the activitypub protocol. That is basically my point, that we already have a 'federated twitter.' So, unless I'm missing something, what would be the point of forking and adding activitypub to twitter when we already have the better version in Mastodon?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I think their point was so that the fediverse people could also see Twitter posts and vice versa, which I guess some people would like, but some would block.

    One of the complaints that people have about the Fedverse is that you're never exactly sure which instances interoperate with which other ones, and so somebody that other people are talking to might be blocked on your instance, and you might think, this fediverse sucks.

    But honestly I think this is necessary for instance sovereignty and safety, so maybe people will get used to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I do think that people will probably get used to that aspect of the fediverse.

    About the twitter bridge, I see your point. It wouldn't be twitter anymore though, it would be the [federated fork name] of twitter which would have to co-opt the current userbase which kind of again leads to the whole why not Mastodon already instead?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    The way I interpreted it was if Twitter made their codebase open source, then people could submit pull requests that would add AP federation, and have them merged. But there's surely room for different interpretations of the original comment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    While I appreciate what you're saying, I don't really think the original comment we were discussing was open for interpretation. It was pretty specific about '...fork it and add[ing] activitypub integration.'

    That being said, I do think it's an interesting thought and I hadn't really considered pull requests to the original code base to add AP. I feel like the likelihood of that actually happening are probably pretty slim though. Would be curious to hear what other people thought about that possibility too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    You are probably right. I think i discounted "make a fork of twitter and get people to use it" as just dumb since Mastodon exists already, so couldn't possibly be what they meant.

    I'm going to hang my hat on how in github when you make a pull request, you have to fork the repo first :p

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    Yeah Elon no matter what you do, the geek/nerd crowd (that you imagine yourself to be a part of) will always hate you. You are stuck with toxic tech bros and racist pedophiles (including your daddy) for life. Enjoy.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Didn't he already do this early 20's and then never update it past the original commit? Or was that only the algorithm.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago*

    I guess he wants free labor to work on it?

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Funny if it’s the frontend style framework only. Presuming it’s not “twitter bootstrap” anymore 🤣

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    Melon Susk can go fuck himself with a cactus

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    no musk, i do not want to see how your sausage is made

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    I'll believe it when the whole stack is actually published.

  • source