all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 28 points 4 months ago (4 children)

This reporting feels careless.

https://www.jpost.com/health-and-wellness/article-902165

The study was conducted as part of Alon Levy's master's thesis in public health at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

I'm not saying masters thesis are not good work, but it's not peer reviewed the same way other research is (yet).

Researchers performed a meta-analysis, a statistical method that combines data from multiple previous studies, incorporating six longitudinal studies conducted in Israel, the United States, Brazil, Finland, and Denmark. Each study included testosterone measurements taken at at least three different time points. In total, data from 118,593 men examined between 1972 and 2019 were analyzed.

This is hardly representative of "worldwide".

Feels very

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    It isn't about being good work or not, without actual review it is worthless as actual science unless history says otherwise. (Claude Shannon)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    Rising levels of obesity and diabetes are expected to play a part, but the team behind the work suggest that environmental factors such as endocrine-disrupting chemicals – which can be found in various household items – and global heating could also be factors in the apparent striking decline.

    So only in ppl who are unhealthy and/or in unhealthy situations. Not really shocking.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Haven't you heard of global heating?

    It's a very serious problem, gee golly duncha know!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    For the small % mentioned in the article. Most of it is just having unhealthy practices.

    Others said that such a conclusion would be premature. β€œObesity and diabetes could easily account for all of this,” said Jayasena

    And global climate change is going to do waaay more damage than mere testosterone issues.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    These affect all of us. You live in the woods?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Everyone have testosterone concerns? From what I read :

    Others said that such a conclusion would be premature. β€œObesity and diabetes could easily account for all of this,” said Jayasena

    Once they see issues in healthy ppl ill be concerned.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Not exactly rocket science. Obesity and sedentary lifestyles disrupt hormonal balance. Of course, people will blame microplastics and "endocrine disruptors", not the Blooming onion at lunch.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Only fans had 7 billion in revenue last year.

    just sayin'

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Idk in the last 50 years mine feels about the same.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    Will this mean less sexual assualt?

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Proof that no one can be an Alpha, bro.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    This is because I mogged them so hard they spontaneously grew a uterus.

  • source
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago

    Oh no

    Anyway

  • source
  • 20 comments in c/science@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 76 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    Rising levels of obesity and diabetes are expected to play a part, but the team behind the work suggest that environmental factors such as endocrine-disrupting chemicals – which can be found in various household items – and global heating could also be factors in the apparent striking decline.

    Capitalism strikes again

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -13 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    endocrine-disrupting chemicals

    that bullshit junk science just refuses to die.

    global heating

    That makes no sense.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Having pleasantly cool nuts is good for your sperm production. I guess it probably does something similar for testosterone production.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    That doesn't make sense to me. The difference would be noticeable depending on the country you live or season you are in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, it was from a list of factors that contribute to an overall decrease. That doesn't mean that it affects everyone in the world, just that it is part of the reason for some of the decrease.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

    Given that the study was done on data that started at 1972, how do we know that testosterone levels weren’t just really high in the 70s?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)
    [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    I'm doing my part

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 4 months ago

    MAGA is evidence of this

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 4 months ago
    [–] 10 points 4 months ago

    Elegant solutions, silver linings, etc.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    And is (more) testosterone good for you?

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago

    I'm doing my part

  • source