9
No more than 100 000 faint satellites should orbit Earth (www.eso.org)
submitted 4 months ago by [B] to c/hackernews@lemmy.bestiver.se
comment fedilink hide all child comments
 

Comments

no comments (yet)

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
there doesn't seem to be anything here
4 comments in c/space@beehaw.org view that post
[+] 13 points 4 months ago (3 children)
[deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I wana say a good chunk of humanity has good takes. Unfortunately those in power often go with the worst ideas in pursuit of power and money

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)
    [deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    It's possible I just put myself in spaces that contain less opposing ideological beliefs. I tend to avoid people that seem unwilling to even consider other options or possibilities. So you might have a point. I actually have no idea. It would be interesting if we could get exact numbers on the overall human races beliefs and opinions on things

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • 1 comment in c/space@mander.xyz view that post
    [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    I'd love to put the telescopes in space too. No more atmospheric distortion!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    1 comment in c/cosmos@piefed.world view that post
    [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Today's cheap satellites provide benefits to humanity, but I also recognize the impact against observation science. I would support a tax on each satellite launched (perhaps based upon the satellite's albedo) to fund the design, building, launch and maintenance of the far more useful space based telescopes so that Astronomical science can still continue with these even better tools.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •