all 2 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 2 points 4 months ago

Pretty fascinating, especially the 1% of tallest trees holding more than half of above ground carbon

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago*

    This was a study of a type of tropical flowering tree in Borneo. I wonder if the giant conifers in the Pacific Northwest have similar adaptations?

  • source
  • 6 comments in c/climate@slrpnk.net view that post
    [–] 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Headline: "…pumping water…"

    Right in the goddamned article

    “Trees contain lots of thin, hollow vessels and they suck water upwards by creating low pressure at the top,” said Professor Lucy Rowland, from the University of Exeter. (emphasis mine)

    Come on, article writers, be kinder to the pedants!

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

    I still don't really understand how trees could possibly suck something up higher than air pressure can push it. Are they like using surface tension or something?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago

    I love trees. So majestic.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago
    4 comments in c/science@lemmy.ml view that post
    [–] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    This just in: 100 million year old species of trees is actually fully capable of surviving and thriving

    Tune in next week to find out if it really even is necessary to piss and shit

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    The article discusses how the trees are able to do this, yet you casually berate the what that the researchers wanted to explain.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago*

    The title of the article is "giant trees have no problem pumping water to top branches". It really doesn't take a research scientist to understand this when evolution over millions of years have already shown the same structure in any giant trees like redwoods and sequoias are sustainable.

    The only thing they state that they proved in the article was that height was not a limiting factor in transpiration. Which, again, is already proven with millions of years of observable evidence.

    It's like explaining to me that the sun is bright, like ya no shit, I can see it's bright.

    Ya, I understand that height doesn't limit a tree's ability to transport water because these god damn trees have been doing fine for millions of years.

  • source
  • parent