top 90 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 121 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Conservatives hated star trek when it first aired in the 60s.

There isn't a single thing in life that they can just accept as it is.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago

    And now they whine constantly about how woke the new Trek is and how much better the old Trek was because it didn't hit you over the head with such liberal concepts like racism, sexuality, or politics. 😂

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 48 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    When did it become woke? The Cage. When there was a competent women wearing pants, as 2nd in command and not used as a damsel where Pike occasionally slapped her ass and called her toots.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Not to mention a black woman as communications officer on the bridge. All this happens within the first few … seconds of the pilot?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child)

    Not to mention a black woman as communications officer on the bridge.

    Uhura doesn't show up until The Corbomite Maneuver in this shot:

    So obviously it became woke in the 3rd episode of The Original Series. /s

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago

    You forgot even having a black woman as a main character. Even if she was essentially just a space secretary.

    where Pike occasionally slapped her ass and called her toots.

    Omg imagine if it was tho

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 66 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    I will say how awesome would it be if children came out genderless till adulthood then they touch a seashell to pick on their 18th birthday. Solve so may problems. STEM becomes more accessible to woman. No pink tax on toys.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Ursula K. Le Guin has entered the chat.

    "Left Hand of Darkness" posits a human like society where people can morph between sexes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Iain M. Bank's Culture series also has people shifting between sexes. It's just a thought process and time for them. One of the books the main character has switched a few times but is currently a male and one of his friends is transitioning.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 4 months ago
    [–] 24 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

    Trek was conceived woke. If anything it's moved away from that with its overuse of Section 31 and the mirror universe. And now there's a war college.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    That's one of the reasons I've despised Section 31 almost from its inception. I don't mind the concept of the Federation having spies and stuff, but an out of control shadow organization who claims it's secretly running things is a little too X-Files.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago*

    That’s one of the reasons I’ve despised Section 31 almost from its inception.

    It was intriguing back when it was one guy and you didn't know if he was sane. Now they're the Heroic Protectors Of Starfleet! The post-scarcity diverse utopia needs unaccountable fascists slinking around in black pleather behind the scenes in order to function, after all.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    Homosexuality cipher in Rejoined, holocaust in conscience of a king (hell, Kirk was written AS A HOLOCAUST SURVIVOR) , abortion rights in mark of gideon, disabled crewmembers, secularist society, vietnam on taste of armageddon, post colonialism and struggle for national indentiry in DS9, Far beyond the stars, "leave your bigotry in your quarters, there's no room for it on the bridge" i mean come the fuck ON fakeass fans deliberately being obtuse at this point

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Mark of gideon. Kirk basically fights an entire planet over abortion rights

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    The original series also features old the first interracial kiss ever televised.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    That’s actually not true. It is argued that I Love Lucy had the first interracial kiss broadcast in the United States. Second to that is William Shatner again with France Nuyen from “Elaan of Troyius” on an episode of The Ed Sullivan Show in ‘58.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago

    1966 is the answer

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    anyone who whines about "woke" is automatically a bad person in my eyes. at least usage of the word is good way for them to out themselves.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    It's always painful when "normal" people in my life complain about thay shit. Like my sister, she very nice and all and kind of "traditional" in a way, hard to explain. Holy shit, tye stuff that annoys her nor no reason. Sometimes i hear her on the phone going: ugh, yes, it has to be politically correct. Same with that gender stuff, right? I always think like wtf, you have two kids, you don't go out anymore, you live in a small town and you talk to like 10 people, why in the world does things like that bother you? Luke she even knows transgender guys, she went to school with a non binary person in the late 90, where no one even knew what the fuck is going on. She has two gay friends and a gay uncle and she likes all of these guys, but still rolls her eyes when a gay person is in a movie or they gender swap swap someone. SHE DOESN'T EVEN WATCH MOVIES. she doesn not care at all. I really don't know what it is, but i know a few people like that who have weird priorities in their lifes or what they decide to make a problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago*

    i wonder if its severe lack of metacognition. They have heard some awful things from somewhere, maybe some hateful news channel or some person who seems okay to them but also spouts hate occasionally. And then they internalize it without even knowing what is happening because they can't question their own thoughts. Metacognition seems to be kind of like immune system for the mind, at least that is how I see it.

    Its quite ironic how some rave against "woke" when they themselves are essentially asleep. At least personally i consider woke to mean that you are actually aware of stuff. Maybe that is the reason the truely wicked people went so hard on demonizing the whole thing. They could lose everything if enough people "woke up". Even more ironic how they also talk about stuff like "mind viruses", when they essentially are about as well in the head as plague zombie is physically. But then again, every accusation from certain kind of people is a confession. The source where all that shit stems from is likely very aware how much their methods resemble how virus works.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 4 months ago (25 children)

    It didn’t become woke after Enterprise, just mostly shitty. With showrunners that like to hide behind the supposed wokeness as a defense against criticism and rightwing assholes happily blaming the shittiness on wokeness.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago

    It was shitty writing with zero subtly.

    Kinda like the original Footloose where it introduces how strongly against dancing the reverend and town is and only later does it slowly build to the revelation his son died after a night of partying.

    But the remake has to open with the party and deaths, funeral and banning dancing.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago (17 children)

    I got banned from one of the Star Trex instances for saying I don't like new trek.

    It's not my fault the writing is shit. Try lasting for more than 3 seasons and then defend the show.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    I like SNW and LD. disc has its moments, and I am perfectly fine seeing alternate universe starfleet. Haven't watched Picard. Probably won't.

    It's okay to not like something.

    I also wish the writing were a little better, but we can't all be Measure of a Man or Inner Light.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Also remember those older sites had stinker bottle episodes along with the award winning great ones. But we can always just skip them, unlike now where everything (except SNW) is a serialized story where no episodes can be shipped without missing details on the overall story. Some characters talk for one scene and it's like 1/3 of their entire screentime on the show.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago*

    picard is almost as bad as STD, I wouldnt watch it(how can they drop the borg alliance in season 2, when season 3 came around(plus too many continuity errors in season 3 that were resolved in old trek(like Changelings, the borg queen that died in voyager endgame, it was also quite clear that most of the material was lifted from non-canon novels that fans wrote). LD and prodigy were quite different, and i think hold a better candle to the 3 main series.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I liked all of them (mainly because i like most movies and tv shows, i'm a simple man) but I also respect other people opinions.

    I just don't understand a significant minority of people's opinion that they should yuck someone else's yum. How hard is it for people to just be nice? Kindness is free after all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    It sucks that the smokescreen of conservatives hating new trek for being too woke exists because part of the problem with new trek is that it's fake woke. It wears the face of progressivism like a skin mask while being a bland representation of an ideal future as imagined by a past era of liberalism that no longer exists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I have the same problem with the MCU.

    There are certain projects that I don't like just because they suck, not because they have women or minorities.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    MCU is pretty much BOBs fault for having streaming, he wanted it to justify the cost of the streaming servicing pushing out slop after slop. from what ive seen, mcu movies, and shows were just promoting the next show or movies.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago*

    same, why is trek communities so holier than thou, gatekept? i suspect alot of them are the nu-fans. when i criticized the writing, and why they have to include so much characthers that were the exact oppsoite of og trek, comment removed from those instances. there was a user here that was obsessed with the lgbtq+ couple in std(i think you know who it is, who had a mental breakdown while on lemmy because he was spending alot of time defending his nutrek positions on mutliple platforms), i dont think they played a big role in the show just because they were lgbtq+

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

    Stop downvoting everyone in the thread just because you got downvoted. Votes are public and your behavior is childish. This isn’t the first time i’ve noticed you doing this.

    Edit: Herr_S_aus_H@lemmy.zip & remon@ani.social also think it’s funny to downvote people calling out anti social behavior. I seriously don’t understand some people’s logic downvoting for no reason on a site where votes are public.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    I seriously don’t understand some people’s logic downvoting for no reason on a site where votes are public.

    I was just scrolling and haven't followed the thread so please be aware that I'm responding in isolation, out of context to whatever situation you're referring to.

    Sometimes I'll disagree with a part or most of a comment that someone made, however I'll also recognize that my opinion on it doesn't align with what the echo chamber thinks. Perhaps I'll just respond anyway, but often I don't want to deal with the expected dogpile and personal comments which I find emotionally taxing, so I'll just downvote instead. In those cases it might appear I'm downvoting for no reason, but there are definitely reasons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    I'm not complaining about downvotes in general. I dislike people who downvote people who mention downvoting (like the two I call out in the above comment) and people who downvote every comment in a thread just because their own comment was downvoted (like bigtyme who i've noticed a bunch of times downvoting entire threads just because someone downvoted him).

    Neither of those things are conducive to a social web with a small population.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    It is imo much more disturbing to see people publicly call out their downvoters and provoke a witch hunt. If any, that behaviour is antisocial and most definitely downvote-worthy.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago*

    I downvote people I disagree with and upvote people I agree with. I don't even check if people downvote me because I don't give a shit. My comment has 13 upvotes, I don't even give a shit to check the ratio because I'm just going to assume only 13 people read the comment and bothered to upvote it.

    You're acting like a child. Drawing a false conclusion, stalking me apparently, and whining about something that will be forgotten in a day. I've also upvoted people, but I guess you're a bad stalker. FYI I downvoted your little baby rant.

    Fucking pathetic.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    And I remember the times when Trekkies trashed Enterprise and Voyager as bad and the bottom of the barrel. I always got good and bad from every incarnation of Star Trek. Sometimes the good outweighs the bad like TNG and Deep Space 9 and sometimes it's the other way around like Enterprise and Discovery.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago*

    Not I, said the lion. IMO Voyager is actually worse than some of the new trek, and Enterprise is the worst of them all. It's just so incredibly boring.

    Turns out I just don't like trek that much. TNG and DS9 were good. A couple of the original movies are good. Some of the episodes in TOS are good too but for the just part trek is just bad writing and camp.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    exactly this, Kurtzman and the paramount executives were determining the type of content that was coming out of trek. sooner or later TREK franchise was going to run into problems with ELISION eventually.

    In hindsight this is what cancelled the SG reboot again, the executives wanted more "audience", they got mad when the showrunners dint go thier way and cancelled the "new series".

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    My biggest problem with NuTrek is that it's too dark. Not in a "thematic" sense but in "projected photons" sense. I feel like I'm straining my eyes to see what's happening on the the set.

    It's one of the reasons I loved Lower Decks so much. I could see what was happening.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago

    the lens flare, the dark lighting usually hides bad props or cgi. the writing is also pretty bad. none of the characthers were likable or relatable because they were to "actually types". except staments and michelle yeoh, only because they were the 2 good actors.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Excuse me. Pint of order. I never grew up.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Honestly I think the difference perceived by the "too woke" brigade is that a lot of the older storylines featured what felt like exceptions to the norm. Smaller instances of people being accepting. An example might be a trans person existing was a whole storyline usually with a gimmick rather than just a given that was treated as the norm that requires no explanation. Individuals being chill very rarely is their problem. It's when someone tries to get them to change their ways and accept something as "normal" that they go bonkers

    But yeah... Woke is such a non term referring to any cultural advancement of acceptance at scale that of course Star Trek was always "woke" it was culturally transformative and minority aware from the beginning

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago*

    that conservative version of woke is very different from the historical meaning. they co-opted it and bastardize to say the "n" word without actually saying it, basically they are too chicken to say the actual N word outloud.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child)

    The difference now isn't a matter of woke vs not woke. The stories have become way more interpersonal drama rather than the older sci-fi focused story telling style, and that just happens to make it seem like there are more woke issues being featured.

    At least that's my take on it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    That's probably a good way of putting it. It seems like there is a greater appetite for personal narrative driven drama in general of late. I prefer a more plot driven narrative probably because I deal with personal narratives more than I'd like to already IRL.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago* (18 children)

    That's not woke. That's science fiction.

    I mean if humans could just change gender/sex/appearance as efficiently as Data's child, there'd be no problem. You'd just do a beep-beeb-boop and that's it.

    As for nutrek, their problem is not woke. Their problem is stupid.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

    Cool of you to provide a microplatform to people whom I assume you deeply disagree with. Very generous.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    What are you talking about? It's an empty search result since the problem with Disco is stupid, not woke.

    Unless what you said isn't true, of course ;)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child)

    Why do you insist that I agree with what video bloggers like Critical Drinker think?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    As for nutrek, their problem is not woke. Their problem is stupid.

    That sentence can be read as "nuteck's problem is not woke, nutek's problem is stupid" or "the critics' problem is not woke, the critics' problem is stupid".

    Considering the body that the sentence was attached to, the latter interpretation is just as valid.

    Language is funny. I apologise for misunderstanding you

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    That still subverts God's will.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Yes, god isn't real.

    Religious people still oppose trans people existing because of religion, not because the operations are not efficient or not safe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    I just want a few episodes of trek with a decent storyline without glaring plot holes and more science than fantasy. I fell off when Picard was ok with working with a murderer and just letting the crimes get swept under the rug. Also the plagiarism of plot lines from old mans war and mass effect did me in. Everyone is like watch season 3 its so much better, and watch brave new worlds, but I've been getting my fix from the trek novels lately.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›