A point missing here is electing politicians who actively hinder development of renewables, which has an impact by magnitudes larger than all these individual decisions.

Sir, this is a Wendy's

People can limit to make a tiny difference. People can accept that climate change is real and demand change from those who can make an impactful change (i.e. governments and huge corporations). The people OP is calling morons are those who are denying climate change, refuse to help, or engage in some kind of "gotcha" moment on social media with some bullshit take like, "Oh So yOu dOn'T pRoDucE aNy GhG ThEn I GuEsS? HmM, InTeReStIng!!!"

So please, stfu because not only do you produce carbon dioxide, you're also filling the internet with more stupid than it can handle.

The point isn't to have no impact on the environment because that's impossible, the only way to do that is to die. The point is to limit emissions at the highest impact areas which are all achieved at the policy level but just in case you feel like a needless ad hominem.

I bike to work, eat vegan for about 9/10 of my meals, drive a used electric when I have to, lend it out when I don't and live in a city that gets the majority of it's energy from renewables. I volunteer with habitat for humanity, I donate to local food banks and rewilding efforts. Have at it.

"Yet you partake in it! Curious!"

Oh it's a troll account. What a blast from the past, those were all the rage back in 2009.

Every woman you know over a certain age has fucked thermoregulation.

Guess what estrogen does