all 87 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 21 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

This is posted on the Guelph subreddit. It’s from a public account so I didn’t block out any names

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    What’s the grey emoji she used

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 19 points 4 months ago (13 children)

    This whole bathing suit launch is hilarious!

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    It’s giving:

    • low budget
    • my agency sent me “friends”
    • we all share a brain
    • I need attention
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] [S] 15 points 4 months ago* (6 children)

    I was looking at all the pics on the Londre page and laughing. Why couldn’t they do it at her pool? Someone in one shot has their baby with them on the boat

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    The shitty photo editing is killing me. 😂 This is next level.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    This is another company that says it doesn’t edit. This was right from the camera! They are so full of shit!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 18 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    I think this is an important comment made on Reddit. Would this be marketed as “The Penis Pocket”? I don’t think any of the women behind the Londre suit would be celebrating its release. I can’t figure out if they think they’re being subversive with this launch or just looking for the spotlight.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    sincerely embarrassed for everyone involved. this is so wack and uncool lmao. sucks to be affiliated with bird in any capacity, but this is an especially embarrassing one.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Also…..a few weeks ago the “artist” posted, asking for ideas of something to make. 🐤suggested a sparkly vulva. Flash forward to this launch. Its all a set up, all the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    New face. I really can’t stand her need to call every object a She or Her

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 17 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I would love to know how many hours she’s spent in front of a mirror gazing at herself in her phone. Children learn by example and the one she’s setting is deplorable.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    The photo on the right was two weeks ago, and the photo on the left is from today. Posted standing in the same position in the same mirror wearing the same earrings. Anyone who thinks Sarah Nicole does not use filters is out to lunch. She looks like too completely different people here- different sized eyes, nose, forehead, cheekbones, jawline. And neither of them are what she looks like IRL.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 14 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    This is such a perfect example of how she manipulates her image to suit her mood!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago

    This! Her face and body change with her emotions. Think of her stupid, smug face when she unboxes a freebie. Her slutty dolphin face when she's feeling extra insecure. Her little 14-year-old girl face with a button nose when she's alone and high as a kite.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 17 points 4 months ago (25 children)

    So little Miss Sarah sees herself as one of Canada’s most influential women and has decided to feature herself in a pay-to-play magazine while leading her followers to believe someone called her to arrange this cover story. This whole Influencer business just reeks! It really feels like she’s throwing everything, including the kitchen sink, at her ‘big career job’ hoping to stay relevant. Her fairy godmother is giving up the executive suite, packing up the family and travelling for a year so Sarah is frantically trying to keep her head above water.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (11 children)

    Ahh yes, Iconic magazine... Is that a Condé Nast publication? I'm being sarcastic. Another feature on how she's a warrior just for showing up. I secretly love all of this. She'll make a great character in a fiction novel. Uncredited, of course. 😏 & truthfully, she's really nothing without the fake hair.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    I asked Google if she paid for this cover and this is what I got.

    Did anyone hear her say that she was offered a different cover but it was paid so she did Iconic?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    Where is this from? I'm reading the comments on her post.

    😬

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

    I can’t find her making this comment anywhere on the post so I’m very confused by this search result! AI tells me it’s in Sarah’s caption but I don’t see it.

    I told AI the comment is not in the caption and got this

    A further search result it this one but the Substack is subscription only.i guess ‘organic choice’ means she didn’t pay?

    I like this comment -

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I have a question. How many faces and noses can one person have in a day?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 4 months ago*

    She seems to have a limitless number and her loyal followers don’t seem to care they’re filtered. Her shoulder and chest in that 7th pic is a revelation and looks nothing like the one further down.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago* (4 children)

    She’s pathetic. She really thinks highly of herself that she believes she’s one of the most influential woman on the Internet. What does she even DO????? She gets half naked and shows her body while pretending to love that body but filters it, that’s influential? What a world we live in that people fall for this crap.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    i always think she’s reached peak cringe, and then she manages to out-do herself again and again. i gotta give it to her, she has absolutely NO shame (… pun intended)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    Wait what lol who’s traveling for a year?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 13 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Queen Panties announced she’s quit Knix and is taking the family for a trip of a lifetime - it begins in Kenya

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    I'm not surprised. Essity (the company that bought Knix) recently purchased OB Tampons, Platex and Carefree. Essity is dipping its toe into the traditional realm of feminine care as period panties are being deemed unsafe and WAY less absorbent than they claimed to be*.

    *On the Essity website under feminine care, five types of products are listed before "leakproof apparel" .... "We offer a broad portfolio of pads, panty liners, tampons, intimate soaps and wipes...." It seems leakproof apparel isn't a priority for Essity anymore.

    I wonder if Joanna Griffiths quit or was asked to leave Knix/Essity?

    Something is up.

    The New Jersey Health Department issued a warning about period panties, and more studies from multiple universities, including Harvard, are showing the dangers of PFAS (skin absorbability).

    I wonder if Joanna is trying to slip away before an entire generation realizes she knowingly poisoned them.

    It's amazing how many false claims Joanna Griffiths made about Knix being 100% PFAS-free. Sure, Joanna, just like your claims of "No photoshop or editing"... From class action lawsuits that Joanna Griffiths lost (regarding PFAS in Knix) to over 50 retouching files from Knix "no photoshop campaigns" being exposed, we know Joanna is a BIG FAT LIAR.

    One interesting lie Joanna Griffiths made to cover up her "PFAS-free" lie was that "Knix contained only short-chain PFAS, which aren't dangerous." That's cute, Joanna. In 2024, the University of Birmingham released a massive study concluding that compounds like PFBS and PFPeA (short-chain) can penetrate skin at substantially higher absorption fractions than legacy long-chain chemicals like PFOA. In other words, short-chain PFAS absorb into our bodies within hours of wearing a garment. It was also noted that types of skin (thinner skin) are more permeable.

    I guess Joanna is like Sarah and doesn't read the news.

    I find it amusing that the University of Toronto is the school that discovered how period panties are the least absorbent and their absorbancy claims are wildly exaggerated. Of course, the NYTimes, Scientific American, and various USA-based and UK publications wrote about this. The Canadian media didn't touch it. Wouldn't want to upset the precious Joanna. She has more millions to make. More women to make sick or kill.

    The joke of it all is that Joanna claimed Knix were more environmentally friendly, meanwhile anyone who uses them contaminates our water supply (thanks!).

    Joanna claimed Knix are more affordable. With women needing 10-15 pairs, this is another lie.

    I read about women asking for advice on cleaning their Knix. I've seen photos of them soaking in buckets, taking up the laundry room. Women on their knees scrubbing their period panties. Joanna's adverts and campaigns made these women think period panties are more moral, or that by wearing Knix you are a feminist.

    Really? I do question those who bought into this. Have we lost our ability to think critically, or are we that naive?

    Period panties aren't new. The same product was made in the 1910's and 20s. They were replaced by pads and tampons in the 1930's. Why? Because pads and tampons worked better and gave women more freedom. Joanna set women back. She remarketed an outdated product. She put us back on the "rag".

    I guarantee girls are playing fewer sports because they are afraid of their leaking panties.

    Last note: Since the USA cracked down on PFAS levels allowed in garments, many women are complaining about their period panties leaking or not working as well. Coincidence?

    & why did Joanna Griffiths shutter all the California Knix stores? California is not poor. Their GDP is the 4th biggest in the world. Could it be that Governor Gavin Newsom's new PFAS restrictions would exclude Knix?

    We will never know because Joanna Griffiths, like Sarah Nicole Landry, is a woman who supports women (lol); she is untouchable.

    Good luck to the women out there who wear Knix.

    *From the National Institute of Health NIH "Emerging research indicates that chronic exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) can induce resistance to common chemotherapy drugs (like carboplatin, doxorubicin, and oxaliplatin) in cancers such as ovarian, colorectal, and pancreatic. PFAS chemicals achieve this by altering mitochondrial function, disrupting normal cell cycles, and reducing the effectiveness of treatments."

    Joanna said, "It's no big deal; they (PFAS) are everywhere." YES, because of tools like you, lady. And not all PFAS are rubbing up against our thin-skinned privates for hours, days and weeks.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    Haven't been on Lemmy for a while, so late to reply! Thank you for this comment! This is SO interesting. I have Endo and Adeno, so bled incredibly heavily before I was put on meds. I used period undies (particularly Knix because they weren't too tight on my sore belly like other brands) so this hits hard! And funnily enough, I actually found them not through an influencer, but on recommendation from a friend. And then recommended them to other friends, before I heard about the PFAS scandal. I switched to a disc pre-covid, and never looked back. The amount of women who these asshats have potentially hurt.... Fuck them.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Gosh, makeup really changes her appearance.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    The fake ass yawn in her latest reel 😆

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago

    JFC she’s such a clown

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Glitchy, glitchy AI filter.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

    Her kids know every big open gaping mouth laugh is fake. She does it in every pic. She’s stuck in the 2016 influencer era of big laugh, coyly looking down at pigeon toed shoes, or holding a cup of coffee.

    Here’s the clip: https://imgur.com/a/ORgt43m

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago

    your archive of receipts is incredible!! the most extreme examples of sarah's lies/deception/exploitation happen on her stories, which disappear after 24 hr. it satisfies my sense of justice and truth to know that somewhere out there, receipts of her horrible behaviour exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Terrified people will see the “real” her. “There’s so many cameras!”

    Meanwhile she posts her family, people in the background, other people’s children without a second thought. But then again she thinks consent is annoying and just wants people to do what she wants them to do.

    https://imgur.com/a/Pf0m37R

    Scared to walk into a store in case anyone sees the real her. 

    https://imgur.com/a/2FfjHh2

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 4 months ago

    Such trepidation as she walks into the store!! She's a liar, and she knows it.

    Can you imagine filtering yourself into a supermodel? Meanwhile, without filters, you look pretty much the same as you did when you hated yourself.

    Right-side image from June 2026

    Right-side image from May 2023

    How on earth did she get away with this? How did people believe a person's face could change so dramatically with weight loss, lenses and angles?

    SUPERMODEL selfie during lockdowns.

    Renee Reina Grenon's sister-in-law needs to come clean about making that video to defend Sarah Nicole Landry's lies and obvious use of filters.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    Is this her transphobic sister at the queer hockey event? I can't tell!!a

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago* (4 children)

    The Birds Papaya, Sarah Nicole Landry's sister Meghann Dykstra (@ourcountryacres on Instagram), reposted and highlighted a social media post that can be seen as transphobic. This repost and highlight were posted on @ourcountryacres' Instagram account around January 30th, 2026.

    The post states, "If a trans person goes Missing... do we put their Picture on a carton of Half and half or... 🙄😂"

    TheBirdsPapaya's sister, Meghann Dykstra @ourcountryacres, is listed as the parent on a bullying-prevention plan PDF. The school is the Kenilworth Public School, part of the Upper Grand District School Board.

    The Upper Grand District School Board and the Kenilworth Public School receive core education funding that comes directly from the provincial government, which is supported by general provincial tax revenues and education property taxes. If you live in Ontario, you pay these taxes.

    Meghann Dykstra is listed as the parent on the Safe Schools Committee. She is listed as an Emergency Supply Teacher (OCT-certified) at Kenilworth Public School.

    Meghann Dykstra's role on the Safe Schools Committee makes me concerned about students attending this school. Meghann Dykstra willingly shared and highlighted a social media post about missing trans people. The post, to me, appears to mock trans people and dehumanize trans people.

    In my opinion, a parent on the Kenilworth Public School Safe Schools Committee who highlights the view point expressed in this exact social media post may not provide due diligence for a trans student who is being bullied or a student who speaks up for trans rights. This is my personal opinion and doesn't reflect this group or Lemmy.ca

    In my opinion, the post dehumanizes trans people. Dehumanizing trans people puts their lives at risk.

    Meghann saved the post to her "highlights" on Instagram. There were only two posts in her highlights.

    Meghann removed the transphobic post when a Redditor posted it two days ago.

    This illustrates to me that Meghann sees the transphobic post as top-tier content that deserves to be highlighted. This is my opinion.

    From PDF School Bullying Prevention and Equity & Inclusive Goal(s):

    1. Encourage activities that promote and empower student voice.     
    2. Embed instructional practice that includes equity and inclusivity on a daily basis.     
    3. Encourage an environment that appreciates differences.     
    4. Bring awareness to the power of one person to make a difference in a bullying situation.     
    5. Build knowledge and understanding about different cultures

    Under Canadian law, public engagement and criticism of public institutions, including school boards, trustees, teachers, and school councils/committees, are legally protected and actively encouraged. I have a legal right to expression. Charter Protections: Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees freedom of thought, belief, opinion, and expression. Public Institutions: School boards (including the Upper Grand District School Board) are publicly funded public bodies. Citizens have the right to question, critique, and comment on their policies, staff actions, and safety programs. I have shared opinions, critiques, and statements of fact.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments