you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 4 months ago (11 children)

Ahh yes, Iconic magazine... Is that a Condé Nast publication? I'm being sarcastic. Another feature on how she's a warrior just for showing up. I secretly love all of this. She'll make a great character in a fiction novel. Uncredited, of course. 😏 & truthfully, she's really nothing without the fake hair.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    I asked Google if she paid for this cover and this is what I got.

    Did anyone hear her say that she was offered a different cover but it was paid so she did Iconic?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    Where is this from? I'm reading the comments on her post.

    😬

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

    I can’t find her making this comment anywhere on the post so I’m very confused by this search result! AI tells me it’s in Sarah’s caption but I don’t see it.

    I told AI the comment is not in the caption and got this

    A further search result it this one but the Substack is subscription only.i guess ‘organic choice’ means she didn’t pay?

    I like this comment -

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I have a question. How many faces and noses can one person have in a day?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 4 months ago*

    She seems to have a limitless number and her loyal followers don’t seem to care they’re filtered. Her shoulder and chest in that 7th pic is a revelation and looks nothing like the one further down.

  • source
  • parent