[–] 10 points 1 month ago

that's the thing! she spent most of this summer cosplaying as a childless 20-something, trying to queerbait the algorithm. she shifts and contorts literally EVERYTHING about herself (personality, fashion, voice, the shape of her face, the shape of her body, eye colour, ailments etc etc) depending on who she's trying to sell stuff to/ingratiate herself with. so pulling up to Global like some regular degular mom is laughable. she's an absolute clown and i really don't think this grift can continue for much longer. but then again, as you rightly point out, companies like Marks apparently do zero research before hiring clowns like her so who knows?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    her "performance" was also so brutal. she was awkward and looked super uncomfortable and out of place. she was, as usual, ill-spoken to the point that some of the sentences that came out of her mouth literally didn't even make sense. and she was clearly using the influencer tactic of performative relatability/authenticity. she's up there clowning like she's just some regular degular mom who happened to waltz into Marks on a whim and stumble upon these AMAZING clothes and shoes that you can't find anywhere else (levis! adidas! how exclusive!) and gosh golly just needs to share this hot tip with all her best pals here on live daytime TV! also why did she keep referring to Marks as "we" throughout the segment? sarah needs some serious media training if she wants to try to actually make a break for it outside of social media/filtered reality on iphones. i would love to know how much Marks paid her and Global for this native advertising bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago

    this is a tinfoil hat theory i can get behind. i wouldn't put this past her. i also think the impending release of her "book" is probably the motivating factor for all of the internet scrubbing/ret-conning she's been up to of late. what a sneaky bird.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

    ahaha thank you i didn't think it was this recent! sarah saying this in 2026 makes it even lamer, she's such an uncultured idiot. also just have to say that the sarah x ICONIC crossover is absolutely wild, two megalomaniac grifters combining forces to produce pure self-aggrandizing slop.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago

    this is absolutely repulsive to me. the amount of damage this, alone, can cause a developing infant is huge. and then multiply that by the literally countless despicable ways sarah has been exploiting that poor child. history will not be kind to narc loser influencers who harm and exploit their children for profit. the tides are already turning, more and more people are able to see this behaviour for what it is.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    does anyone here remember and/or have receipts for the time sarah said something about how utah was the epicentre of trends? i cant remember where/when i saw that, but something about the vanity shoot she posted yesterday reminded me of that lmao. it's such a hilarious and specific insight into her psyche, to know that she believes fundie/hun influencers are cutting edge.

  • source
  • view more: next ›