Hope this is ok to post here! Thebirdspapaya.com appears to be 🚧 under construction 🚧 these days. Perhaps looking to erase some of her past personas and strange rambling thoughts from the internet in order to rebrand as a brave ageing model. Let’s not forget some of the moments that have made Sarah the woman she is today!

top 99 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [S] 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I think that no matter what Sarah tries to rebrand as, she will always be herself and she’s incapable of growth. She is still the same insecure, body obsessed 40+ yo women she wrote about despite alll her claims of enlightenment. The only true change may be that she dropped the Jesus thing

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    She’s always geared her content toward fetishizing motherhood and being overtly sexual while creating motherhood/family content. it’s super strange.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    jfc i can see why sarah's deleting all this. besides the incoherent slop (like truly, her writing barely makes sense), this adds suuuuuch a wild layer of context to her current situation. "didn't age well" doesn't even begin to describe how impossible it is to square this with her current affair/divorce situation.

    same deal with her posts about EDs and body image issues. she's currently presenting as the same size as the pics on blog posts where she claimed she was suffering from ED and raging against the diet industrial complex/fashion magazines etc. it just doesn't work to be posting constant body checks of a manufactured size 00 body right now and have this archive showing how she actually built the platform she has.

    good luck ret-conning all of this, sarah. these stories you so skillfully told ten+ years ago are the roots of the empire you built! you should be proud of this blog, not trying to delete it and hide it!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

    Now that it’s been revealed she may have a book coming out it makes sense that she’s cleaning up the internet of receipts. Mentioned in a newer post her creating newer cleaner versions of incidents so they show up on google searches as more recent.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 month ago

    The book launch is going to be a great time to drop the receipts! The thing Ms Sarah Nicole Landry forgets is the internet is forever. She can delete all she likes but the evidence of her lies and filtering ks littered all over and she can count on a dedicated group to drop those receipts!

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 7 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 7 points 2 months ago

    Just a collection of pics I’ve come across that show her diverse range lol

  • source
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 7 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 7 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 7 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I am fully aware that vanity sizing exists but I'm gonna need to see a size 2 that fits the same as a 10 with my own eyes. I live in jeans and that huge of a size spread is absolute BS in my opinion. A size up or down? 100%. 2 sizes? Less likely but OK, could happen. FOUR? Fuck off.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 months ago
    [–] 7 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 7 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 7 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (24 children)

    Nothing too revelatory in these old old posts but for prosperity sake lol

  • source
  • hideshow 24 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago (23 children)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago (22 children)
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 months ago (21 children)
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 months ago (18 children)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago (17 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Holy shit, even had to comment on the shape of her pregnant belly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago

    the obsession with bodies (her own and other people's) is the most pathological i have ever seen. it's so fucked up that instead of getting help/intervention/treatment for this, she turned it into a career.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago (12 children)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago (11 children)
  • [–] [S] 4 points 2 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    She 100% had upper blepharoplasty.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Right? I don’t think there’s any doubt despite her denial (and daddy’s)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago* (4 children)

    Sarah Nicole Landry, Scott Corney of Guelph, STOP LYING! You look like fools.

    If Sarah knew how many members of the media and younger influencers are talking about her, she would be devastated. They talk about her lies, her filters, how cheap her family is, and her cheating; if she knew, she would bury her filtered head in the sand. Even people who pretend to like Sarah are talking about Sarah. She's not loved; she's not even liked. I think she knows that. If she didn't buy followers, likes, views and beg for comments from her "peers", she'd be nothing. A big nothing.

    I wish I could share screen grabs, but I'd out myself, and I don't need Big Al harassing me. Just know that very few people actually like Sarah. The few that do are grifters like her. The others tolerate Sarah because Canadians are afraid of confrontation. Just last week, someone I thought was a big Papaya supporter messaged me to say "WTF," and have a good old laugh. This is someone Sarah likes to shout out, as if they were a pal.

    GURL, if you only knew.

    🤣

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Ha love this tea! She’ll end up alone in the end but not even that will bother her as much as ending up forgotten

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago
    [–] 6 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago
    [–] 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

    on reddit people are saying that lemmy isn't coming up in their google searches anymore. i don't think it's a coincidence that this started happening at the exact same time that sarah is scrubbing her blog + Forcedbirthtrauma has been building this incredible archive of the blog. i know sarah and her loser lackeys read here and based on sarah's history of trying to police the internet, i really wouldn't be surprised if her and her team are actively burying lemmy somehow. like, YOU wrote this shit! these are your words! fuckin own them. you must know that what you do is wrong if you work this hard to try to cover it up.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yes I didn’t notice until today when it was mentioned but this page is showing up differently when I try to search for it, even across different search engines. It seems very coincidental with the blog posts. Is it too revealing Sarah? Who are you trying to become that you need to change your past?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Concerned that others might not think her children are attractive

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    again, evidence of how deeply pathological her obsession with bodies/appearances is. it's so fucked up, i feel SO bad for her kids, she's been projecting this onto all of them since they were babies!! i really, really hope the kids' other parents/impactful adults are working hard to protect their kids from the havoc this shit can wreak on a child's psyche/sense of self/understanding of the world.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago

    Grease your kabobs people!!

  • source
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago

    Including this article from 2017 because it paints a very differing picture of natural, healthy weight loss and not an ED and malnutrition as she later claims

  • source
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    So sad to have missed her book lover/wellness guru personality

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    72 books a year … sure 🙄

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    That's six books a month. She was working full-time. Plus handling her social media and blogging career. She had three kids to take care of (and she probably didn't do much for them). She was in a relationship, dating Shane, making time for him. She wasn't a train commuter; she drove to work. How did she squeeze in six books a month? Audiobooks, maybe; hard, maybe. I read for a few hours a day and manage four books a month. I don't have kids, and I'm on flights and trains a lot. She lies about everything and makes up random numbers. Also, who TF counts their books?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 6 points 2 months ago
    [–] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    This is awful. Telling her millions of followers that her first ex-husband (whom she cheated on) is an abuser. Does she have any proof? Did she fake happiness for their entire marriage?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    She’s certainly painting a picture of them fleeing from something. She’s also said she doesn’t talk about why their marriage ended so this weird bread crumbing of details like that is pretty scummy. Either tell your story truthfully or keep it private. She always wants to keep it open for interpretation so she can change the story later

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago*

    gesturing towards spousal abuse in this way is fucking despicable. domestic violence and spousal abuse are rampant and soooo many people (especially women/femmes) have experience with this.

    sarah is such a twisted fuck, hinting at something like this in order to build parasocial relationships with people who actually live with/have lived through abuse, and/or hinting at this to garner sympathy is beyond fucked up.

    ALSO false abuse allegations are extremely rare, and whenever they do occur, they make it that much harder for actual survivors to speak up.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 months ago
    [–] [S] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Sorry this one is a bit long and awkward!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›