1 comment

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] -1 points 4 months ago

Aaaaw. Poor sod. Don't cry, you got them back, in contrast to most ICE victims.

  • source
  • 12 comments in c/politics@lemmy.world view that post
    [–] 105 points 4 months ago*

    “I don’t know how much we can do about it, but so help me God, if there is any way to press civil or criminal charges over this, we will,” he wrote on Substack. “Not just for our own sakes but to draw a line that I thought everyone already recognized: do not mess with someone’s kids.”

    I mean... the people who do this literally support pedophiles and are often the same themselves. So "messing with someone's kids" is like the fucking norm for these freaks.

  • source
  • [–] 56 points 4 months ago (10 children)

    Idk Pete. Democrats seem incapable of bringing justice to people who fuck with kids.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    You're right, the party that doesn't control the branch of government that has the most power to bring these people to justice are in fact not exercising their lack of power to do the things they can't do. Very astute observation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Four years Biden had to get an indictment against Donald for sedition. Or just make a move to get him off the ballot for the same.

    Eight years Obama had to indict W for war crimes, but didn’t.

    The ruling class protects each other.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago*

    Do you think Obama, Clinton or the Bushes weren't aware of the ring of super wealthy pedos distributing terabytes of csam and manipulating world leaders?

    It goes futher back as well. The original LSJ known as North Fox Island was where the same kind of pedos would abduct children to, that was run by a high ranking American colonel (may have their rank wrong) who ADVERTISED AND SOLD TAPES OUT OF NEWSPAPERS AND ZINES

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 4 months ago* (3 children)

    You mean when both Obama and Biden were well aware of Epstein's adventures?

    Plenty of blame to go around. They've all been sucking Oligarch cock.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • 11 comments in c/nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz view that post
    [–] 16 points 4 months ago (9 children)

    That night, the twins slept at their grandparents’ house. The authorities required them to sit alone for the interviews with the CPS workers, as is common during such investigations.

    Being forced to "sit alone" with CPS staffers is pretty rough for a kid, and if CPS "requires" it without first requiring some damned evidence, that's a form of child abuse.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    If someone reports that kids are being abused, then the trained professionals in childcare and abuse investigations should absolutely not have to include the presumed abusers or enablers in their process.

    The child is the priority and their discomfort is better than their abuse.

    Imagine if CPS was called because someone said the kids were being raped and the children had to sit their alongside their rapist answering difficult upsetting questions unsure of everything other than their abuser is beside them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (5 children)

    So, did you miss the "without first requiring some damned evidence" line, or simply ignore it..?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    So you would seek to gather evidence from the victim, while their abuser is in the room with athority over them?

    First port of call is separating and investigating.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    So you would seek to gather evidence from the victim, while their abuser is in the room with athority over them?

    Nobody has said that except you.

    So, you're investigating Epstein allegations, and you think Epstein himself is in the room for every interview..?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I didnt say that, you cant follow like three two sentence comments. Thats on you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Guess you didn't appreciate the implication of what YOU were suggesting.

    So you would seek to gather evidence from the victim, while their abuser is in the room with athority over them?

    Holy goldfish memory, Batman. I'm quoting you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    And you need to consider that in context, I wasn't saying that in every case that the abuser could be present. I was saying in the context of child abuse victims being interviewed alone, which I think is a valid process given otherwise their abuser could be in the room with them taking charge of their interview or statements.

    Being able to quote something doesnt mean you csn comprehend it, or follow the thread in simple terms.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    If there's no evidence beyond an anonymous tip, this is the wrong response. Make enough anonymous tips, and every kid in America could be required to sit for an interview, over and over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    Then you have a completrly different set of circumstances where false reports wildly out number real cases and that would need to be accounted for but process should be followed regardless.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -21 points 4 months ago