43
Pete Buttigieg Says He Was Separated From His Children After ‘Swatting’ Tip (www.nytimes.com)
submitted 4 months ago by to c/nyt_gift_articles@sopuli.xyz
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The former transportation secretary recounted being kept away from his 4-year-old twins overnight after an anonymous report falsely accused him of posing a threat to them.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 4 months ago (5 children)

So, did you miss the "without first requiring some damned evidence" line, or simply ignore it..?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    So you would seek to gather evidence from the victim, while their abuser is in the room with athority over them?

    First port of call is separating and investigating.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    So you would seek to gather evidence from the victim, while their abuser is in the room with athority over them?

    Nobody has said that except you.

    So, you're investigating Epstein allegations, and you think Epstein himself is in the room for every interview..?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I didnt say that, you cant follow like three two sentence comments. Thats on you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    Guess you didn't appreciate the implication of what YOU were suggesting.

    So you would seek to gather evidence from the victim, while their abuser is in the room with athority over them?

    Holy goldfish memory, Batman. I'm quoting you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago

    And you need to consider that in context, I wasn't saying that in every case that the abuser could be present. I was saying in the context of child abuse victims being interviewed alone, which I think is a valid process given otherwise their abuser could be in the room with them taking charge of their interview or statements.

    Being able to quote something doesnt mean you csn comprehend it, or follow the thread in simple terms.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent