My (millionaire boomer) Uncle from Mexico recently shared this (sorry for quick translation using gemini). There are brainwashed people everywhere


My (millionaire boomer) Uncle from Mexico recently shared this (sorry for quick translation using gemini). There are brainwashed people everywhere


In the US, we are under a massive oligarch-owned far-right propaganda machine that dominates social media and television viewership.
It works so well that rich people in other countries are trying to adopt the same model as a means of popular control.
Oh shit. I don't know why that hadn't occurred to me before 😂
Our cultural imperialism is exporting rebellion and the destruction of civilization.
Damn, that whole great American satan thing hits different.
Recently my lead hypothesis is that many people would rather personally suffer and die if it means that black people have it worse. I read "dying of whiteness" recently, and it's haunting. "It's socialism" is just a coded way of expressing that.
TLDR: Whites in some parts of America drained public pools rather than integrate them. They should rather no one have a public pool than have to share it with black people.
Broadly, humans are happier when they have more than their neighbors. Having the biggest house in the neighborhood strongly correlates with increased happiness. Having a McMansion in a neighborhood full of other McMansions leaves people no happier, on average, than having an average mobilehome in a mobile home park. (Free public radio audio coverage, links to Washington Post text article: https://www.marketplace.org/story/2026/01/13/why-larger-homes-dont-lead-to-more-happiness)
In the US, having black people be "the ones with less" that makes people of other races get that "better than my neighbor" happiness boost is structurally convenient, but other groups fill that need in other cultures. Jews and communists are other common targets in Western cultures, all non-Japanese get the treatment in Japan, the Tutsis in Rwanda, the eastern ethnic groups in Russia, and on and on. This hugely common psychological tendency is damaging to creating broadly prosperous societies, but hopefully the learnings from the studies of it will help us create strategies to structurally counteract it.
I am sorry, but this is so strange to read and realize how different some people worldviews are...
Due to the job requirements, I travel a lot, and though I've been just for 2 months in USA accumulated, in Europe and Asia, I've met just two people with similar worldviews in around 14 years of travelling...
Everyone else I know, and I, would just not care about the color or race, or be fascinated how unique people are, and would never even be so awful towards these people to the point of being basic horrible, sorrowful racists... as you described... but just default to the understanding and believe that people were born around the world whenever they could, inheriting the local inheritance, traditions, culture, and family, and they are still people with infinitely magnificent Souls and equal rights to live and just be... human...
They would trust in people, and that it's always possible to find compromise with each other, explaining issues and finding solutions.
That is, to be humans, and trust in human, as an ineffably magnificent opportunity to be alive... and explore the infinite world...
Sorry. No... Yours is absolutely not, even remotely not the way to see and live the world... I believe, and never will. Your worldviews are utterly... sorrowful, unfair, hateful, dark, and simply, sorry, disgusting...
It's darkening to know that you live with these believes out there... and I would recommend you travelling... Please do consider discovering the world out there... to live...
Are you trying to say acclaimed book "Dying of Whiteness" ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dying_of_Whiteness ) is invalid because of your personal experiences?
I'm sorry but there's a large body of evidence that many people in the US are deeply racist. Not always in a "wear a hooded costume" overt way, but in more polite and dressed up to look inoffensive ways as well.
You can also read the new Jim Crow and "the color of law".
I appreciate the effort you invested into point out the references, but I am sorry, I'll pass, because I do not want to participate in this sorrow in any way, including additional knowledge of human humiliation based on the way they were born.
Simply put, I consider it stupid, inhuman, and not worthy my life time. What I would like to invest time instead is to read and know about the way people find compromises, mutual respect, and solution solving in long term.
You'll participate whether or not you desire to. Knowledge will better equip you to engage with the world, good and bad, as it is. But it's your choice. I'm not your professor.
Do you know the history of black people in America? You know about chattel slavery? That wasn't really that long ago.
Yes, the USA's filmography is very known around the world, with many ineffably sorrowful issues depicted, yet I have no idea why modern people do still continue behave the same, or even worse way.
And I do not want to even know more about this indescribably sorrowful, stupid, and simply inhuman attitude towards people being born in different way they likely didn't even chose how, where, and when, yet now are being humiliated for what? For being born? Get yourself together already, humans, if you still are... humans...
Most people don't care about skin color.
While true.. a more than fairly large amount of people do care about skin color. For example, 77 million (some 30-40% of voting age) people in US care more about what color someone else's skin is, then their own well being. In my country, Sweden, that percent is about 20. So no, I'd say a great deal of people do care about such idiotic things as skin color.
Yes and very extremely much no. People are afraid of change, no matter who they are. By selling you that your way of life is defined by the fact that you're surrounded by whiteness means that the powers that be can villianize marginalized communities because "they're going to destroy our way of life". That xenophobia was then weaponized to take out social programs by burdening them with largely useless administrative overhead like work requirements. Seemingly "sensible" add-ons whose only purpose was to strip as many people as possible of benefits. While also making benefits a trap of poverty (since poverty is the most profitable category for the ultra wealthy. They spend the most of their income out of all the classes and can't demand more wages lest they lose their benefits)
They are also absolutely floating in oil wealth.
So is the US
The US citizens are definitely not oil wealthy.
That's my point. America actually has roughly 10 times as much oil as Norway, but in Norway everyone benefits from the oil rather than just a handful of mega-rich oil barons.
That definitely ain't right.
Norway is a stupid example. Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Iceland easily have the same level of welfare or arguably better than Norway in many regards. The key is to make public investments into the country's resources (be it farmland, forestry, mines, electricity) and build infrastructure and institutions that benefit the people.
By investing directly, you are doing the thinking instead of deferring judgement to bankers and the "invisible hand" that's really just a bunch of rich dudes with their own incentives that don't align with yours. You cut out billionaire middlemen and money doesn't have to "trickle down", and you can steer the behavior of your industries and universities toward causes that take your country's needs over time into account.
That's how good investors think about their business empires - why should countries choose to not strategize at all and just let nature do its thing?
Finland
We're currently suffering from the nazis-in-government disease. Of course social services are still better than in, say, the US, but we had a decisive downwards trend in the past 2 years. Plus scandals. TBH I don't think they'll get re-elected.
And I'm sure many Swedes and Danes would have something similar to say about their own government. Maybe even Norwegians? Idk. My point, "socialist" Nordic countries are not immune from the scurge.
The World Bank had a 1993 report that basically concluded government industrial policy was to be avoided if the goal was to grow wealth broadly. This guided (or was representative of the views of people in power) decisions on international aid and other conditional support to developing countries for decades.
Leaving development of industry and technology deployment entirely to the private market economy didn't work. Countries with the highest average standards of living, or the most improvements in standard of living, have had significant government guidance of the major industries in their economy. Only this year has the World Bank issued a new report acknowledging this: https://www.bu.edu/gdp/2026/04/24/from-paradigm-maintenance-to-paradigm-shift-a-mood-change-on-industrial-policy/
True, and worth a reminder. But they choose to do, well, social things with it*. In addition to more "normal" social welfare stuff they give money to people who live in the very North, just for living in the North.
They also have so many waterfalls that all their electricity is hydro, and they have too much of it.
They tried to sell it cheaply to the EU some decades ago but of course our energy lobby blocked it.
* also cultural etc. etc. Like another commenter said: they choose to let their people participate in it
To admit that other countries do better would be to violate the dogma of American exceptionalism. It would be to offend the fragile egos of the most brainlessly egotistical among us. And I guess ultimately they think their feelings matter more than their own wellbeing.
If socialism "never works" I'd say it's in the same boat as democracy.
Social democracy managing capitalism is rather Nice. Freedom of making profits while providing a strong social net.
Or rather capitalism whithin a social democracy. Population shoulf dictate the rules
The US used to be much better than any European country when it comes to inequalities. Look at things now.
When politicians and capital-owners are able to collude, you end up with oligarchs. And so far every social democracy out there has some. It's just a matter of time until we all get our Reagan/Thatcher
Aren't they both dead now?
They’re either both alive, or nobody cares enough to update their pages.
Senior now runs a restaurant + chopper museum. The guy wanted to run it like a proper business, but without the specials it wasn't running that well. Junior now has his own design studio.
Half the time I have this argument IRL, they go mask-off and say it's because of race.
It's more like 30%, the rest of us would gladly take a standard of living boost. But FoX News, OANN and every other disinformation factory have brain washed a lot of people.
Its not the welfare policies its the tentacles in the global south and the violence that keeps that in place
I think kind people should push for regional economic independance or at least verification of its viability and acknowledgement that they are working their fair share.
Then one can be sure that at least from your point of view, the exploited worldwide are free to choose their own fate, and you are not a leech.
Economic independence is a useful tool, in that when one is economically independant, it can also be determined for certain that any external law or force is unjust and not a component of livelyhood.
Norway is just a capitalist country with strong welfare policy undoubtedly
Norway has oil. It's horrible example because other states don't have resources to build massive national wealth fund to finance all the welfare
The far right thinks Norway is "communist". The far left thinks Norway is "not capitalist".
Both are wrong.
What? The far left knows that Norway is capitalist.
The far left thinks "capitalism" is a bad word the way the far right uses "communism".
Democrats are having fights right now over whether they're capitalists or socialists and it's so fucking stupid. Pointless arguments that hand the country to the right.
Incredibly important midterms coming up and we seem more interested in attacking each other than defeating Republicans.
DSA are not anti capitalist. They are barely left leaning by the standards of the rest of the world.
The real fight being had are between corporatists and populists.
The far left doesn't think capitalism is a bad word. They think it's a failed system.
Democrats are currently demonstrating exactly what their role is in society - protect the fascist right from a left-wing challenge. Democrats are the moderate wing of fascism, just like they were in Germany a century ago
The centrist American perspective is that we're the richest, strongest country in the world with deep-rooted systemic problems that are destroying us and that absolutely nothing can be done about it.
The realistic view is that we're very rich, not quite as strong and stable as we imagine, have deep systemic problems that have been rotting us from within, and it would take large sweeping changes to begin a road to recovery, changes that few are yet desperate enough to begin looking at (because of the first part, we're still mostly comfortable, even as we see shit falling around us).
The DoI even spoke of this, few people are willing to uproot what they're familiar with as long as the suffering is manageable.
The problems facing the US aren’t unique to the US, they’re affecting most western democratic countries to varying degrees.
One of the biggest has been the slowest one to develop: a crisis of trust in and abandonment of the traditional institutions of society. The media, government at all levels, the legislative process, law enforcement and the courts, and civil society.
This crisis may be precipitated by but also contributes to a general breakdown of the social contract and an explosion of cynicism and authoritarianism in politics.
The problem is our constitutional amendment system looks impossible at this point due to the state focused system and the polarization between state legislatures.
If 80% are having the debate is that 40% advocating socialism? Please let that be the case. We Europeans keep getting news items to suggest 80% likely hate any form of vote for welfare systems.
A majority of Americans under 35 support socialized medicine but not so much the rest of it.
Speak for yourself. I've been a socialist most of my adult life.
I'm just stuck living in a country where 99% of voters are lesser-evilists and just kind of ignore where that gets us. At least, they did until they started starving and had to start living out of their cars. Socialism is looking pretty good now that capitalism spat the centrists out.
What I love are the tankies that are absolutely repulsed by Norway, Sweden and Denmark. They REALLY don't like socialism that way lol, for reasons I cannot fathom.
I asked them to show me another example of socialism working that well and it didn't seem to make them happy lol
There are non-tankies (me) who just wouldn't call those countries socialist.
When asked if there are current examples of socialism working well. Pretty much no, you get couped by the CIA for that haha
No, I don't count Cuba, Vietnam, china etc. as socialist.
You can't have socialism without democracy, because of, ya know, the whole "worker control" thing...
I'm most familiar with China, and there they just have an extra aspect of the ruling class which also includes party position, in addition to wealth...
In conclusion, accurately pointing out that Norway, Sweden and Denmark aren't socialist, doesn't mean you're a tankie.
They're just more regulated capitalist countries with better social safety nets than the USA.
they're about as close to socialism as anything that ever worked.
look, you can say hey these countries are socialism light, or soft socialism, or whatever, but they WORK a fuckton better than anything the hard core types has ever accomplished. And if you call China socialist then ANYTHING is socialism. Pick a lane, you don't get it both ways.
On the other hand, the terrible object lesson examples for socialism litter the history books. I'll take a soft socialism 5/5 times before gambling with Pol Pot, Stalin, Xi, Kim etc., you do you.
I think perhaps there has been a misunderstanding because I'm saying none of the above are socialist?
It's not having it both ways?
The Nordics are not socialism light. The capitalist class are alive and well there. The workers do not have democratic control over the workplaces (unless they happen to be part of a coop), and you're still able to amass large amounts of wealth on the backs of the working class (there are billionaires from all those countries).
I'm not disagreeing that it's working better than the "hardcore types" (who I've just said aren't socialist). I'd rather live on the Nordics over China, Vietnam, Cuba etc any day...
I feel like you haven't actually read my comment :(
On the other hand, the terrible object lesson examples for socialism litter the history books. I'll take a soft socialism 5/5 times before gambling with Pol Pot, Stalin, Xi, Kim etc., you do you.
In name only. In my opinion, if it's not democratic, it's not socialism. But I'm kinda annoyed that you're implying I think those "examples" are something worthwhile...
for reasons I cannot fathom
that their wealth comes from the exploitation of the global south…? it’s not a thing leftists are quiet about lol
their wealth comes from the exploitation of the global south
norway's exploiting the global south?
sweden? is that an ikea thing?
lol wtf... please educate us
norway’s exploiting the global south?
sweden?
Where do you think these countries source fresh vegetables+fruits, rare metals, clothing, shoes, asphalt, concrete…?
See clearly you need to read more theory. The Nordic countries are broadly aligned with the USA, that makes them Satan and responsible for all the evil in the world and you should support gangster oligarchies and theocratic dictatorships who oppose them.
it's so hard to parse a good joke when it comes to tankies this nearly flew right by
responsible for all the evil in the world rofls the great satan, oh man.
I love it. when they completely turn off their brains like this, does it require pulling a plug out or is there a switch?
pogroms and purges of stalin? THE USA's FAULT
great leap forward where millions starve? OH YEAH, USA'S FAULT BABY
NOTHING IS EVERY YOUR FAULT WHEN YOU'VE GOT THE GREAT SATAN TO BLAME LOL
christ wept this is hilariously stupid
thank you I needed this laugh. well put.
The best part is that it isn't even a joke, that is how tankies think when you strip off the rhetoric. They honestly think siding with horrible regimes to oppose "imperialism" (even when opposing imperialism involves literal invasions of neighbouring countries) is the lesser evil.
Which is its own level of hilarious given the scorn they have for voting for social democrats as the lesser evil.
Norway is a bad comparison. It has a more homogenous population, a different culture, no state system, and has a very large oil fund.
Norway's oil trust, formally known as the Government Pension Fund Global, is the world's largest sovereign wealth fund, managing over US $2 trillion in assets. Established to safeguard petroleum revenues for current and future generations, the fund invests heavily in global equities, bonds, real estate, and renewable energy.
A better comparison might be Germany or Britain.
Most Americans oversimplify every issue to being afraid of commies hiding in the bushes like they did in the 1950s. The major differences now are a much shorter attention span and much more superficial analytical process - spending as little time as possible taking in information before making an immediate value judgement and mentally swiping left or right.
This predates apps with left or right swiping features and goes back all the way back to the founding days of Fox News. The whole point was to gamify/sportify politics with pure propaganda to the point where you could never get enough political will to actually remove a president again. Which comes with building the demon of the Others narrative and everything else we know today.
Yup. Turns out everyone is on a team now, and it extends even to religion. Politics now determines your religion more than your religion determines your politics.
Edit: Oh, boy. downvoting facts again. Yes, of course YOU are not on a team. You are an INDEPENDENT THINKER that ONLY SEEKS THE TRUTH. I'm talking about those OTHER people.
The religious profiles of U.S. adults – how religious they are and what religion they identify with – are closely aligned with their partisan political identities, according to the new Religious Landscape Study (RLS).
https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2025/02/26/religion-partisanship-and-ideology/out
all 61 comments