At this point 90% of the time someone starts on about demographics and birthrates, it’s just fascist dog whistling. I can’t be convinced declining birth rates are a real problem, our labor has long since stopped being the limiting factor on productivity. The evidence is in how many pointless jobs there are.
post
The Trump administration wants to eliminate the nation’s Teen Pregnancy Prevention program—again. Last year, the administration called the program “radical indoctrination.”
Somehow it gets worse: the same week Trump proposed a budget sans Teen Pregnancy Prevention, conservatives lost their collective minds over the fact that the teen birth rate is going down. Seriously.
On Friday, Fox News analyst Dr. Marc Siegel called it a “problem” that teens are having less babies:
“The problem is teens and young adults from ages 15 to 19, the fertility rate is down 7 percent, and it’s down 70 percent over the last two decades, meaning we’re telling people that are young not to have babies, to wait until they’re in a more stable life situation, until they’re more financially secure. Maybe they haven’t found the right partner.”
Just a reminder that most teens are impregnated by adult men.
Yep, several on the right have been throwing absolute fits that the falling birth rate is partially tied to teens preventing pregnancies at higher rates.
Wild stuff. Reducing teen pregnancy has been a goal of nearly everyone in society for decades. I can understand why they might be more concerned about fertility rates among adults but teen pregnancy is very dangerous...
Animals under high stress do not reproduce. This has been well established. Humans are animals. The global economy has produced too much stress and the rewards are going to a handful of people, while we suffer to make "line must always go up" a reality for them, we can't afford food. But we did briefly have the world's first trillionaire, so that's pretty nifty.
It's not really about the stress so much as it is about women having control over their own life choices.
Which is what the article says.
I agree, women not having bodily autonomy, speaking as a non female, sounds like it would be stressful
Women are delaying having children and prioritizing other things like career advances, education, and travel which is affecting the birth rate.
Which is what the article says.
Yes the stress has an impact as well. But there’s other reasons like women having more choice over when they have children.
Make it easy to be in a community, fed and comfortably housed and you'll start seeing lots of kids again. Tho, the attention black holes in our pockets are also a part of the problem imo.
We don’t need to solve a problem that isn’t a problem, specifically the falling birth rate.
Let women choose when they have children.
Plus give us all the good community and safety social nets. But not because it’ll make women have more babies, because it’s the right thing to do regardless.
???? I didn't say women women should be forced. I think they want to have children but current socioeconomic policies don't allow for it. I say it as a lucky person that's gonna be an uncle soon. Because my sister has all of the 3 things I mentioned.
Did you read the article?
I’m not saying you think women should be forced.
The article details that women delaying children and having more choice over WHEN they have children is affecting the birth rate more than material conditions.
I’m just having a conversation with you about the article.
A lower birth rate means less workers. However the capital(factories, buildings etc) is still about the same. Therefore in a free market, workers should be paid more. In Western Europe there were two periods, when the wealth gap closed. One was after WW2, when millions died and the earlier one was after the black death.
this is why population collapses are surprisngly a good thing for workers after they have subsided because 1. it forces workers to be paid more even a little more since there is less people out there to work and 2. it gives a few workers the insight that Marx was rigjht, you shouldnt let the very rich and the politically connected bbe the ONLY ones who contrrol how much children you have . You should take a hold of your reproductive rights and produce less workers for them if the bourgeoisie make your life and youur loved ones' lives enshittified.
A society owned and ran by the people who do the most work (a dictatorship of the proletariat) is the ultimate andd only goal right now. By ANY means necessary .... 👀
If you want more children, foster an environment favorable to children. Austere policies and dystopian living is not fostering such an environment. Also, there is no “new land” on this third rock from the Sun (yes, I’m aware of volcanism but the state boundaries are more or less set unless wars happen). Getting and keeping Mars or any planetoid is extremely remote.
all 18 comments