There is alt-text in the post's body. It was too long to put here.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 28 points 1 year ago (19 children)
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Signal is the sad compromise for the people I hold dearest because I refuse to use Messenger anymore and SMS is a joke with how glaringly unencrypted/de-facto wiretapped it is.

    I’d love to get everyone on SimpleX but they already look at me like a wacko over Signal. The convenience tax is just non-negotiable for them and I have no idea how to bypass it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I used to be a big proponent of simplex even if I dont use it with anyone, but I was told that the main developer supports tr*mp and m*sk... If you go to their github, they only link twitter as their social media and if you check their account...

    https://github.com/epoberezkin (dunno if were allowed to share twitter links)

    Talks about "far-left radicals", says that nazis were socialist etc. etc. .... Really yikes

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    TBH I feel like so many project leaders are wackos that I don't even judge the products by those, just by things they do. I still have hope in Simplex, but there were a couple of red flags, such as content scanning proposals, including clientside. Sure, it can probably be relatively easily forked to remove that specific thing, or you can choose the servers that don't do that, but it's still alarming that they try.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

    The question is not is Proton perfect in every conceivable way, the question is: is it more private than Google and the answer to that is yes.

    When you opine on social media that Proton is somehow just as bad as Google you are helping doing the work of Google and that's the part that (again I don't truly believe this) makes me wonder if Google/Meta/Twitter is sowing the social web with seeds of doubt about more private alternatives.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

    For private communication Signal is the gold standard LOL

    Not everyone needs shitty xmpp extensions, Matrix that lacks PFS and is enshitiffying as we speak (I say as an avid user) or overkill like SimpleX or Briar.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    You seem to be misinformed. Signals architecture is explicitly designed in a way to minimise metadata as much as possible. You can look up the data they had to hand over due to lawsuits, it was absolutely minimal

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    First - I'm not sure Sealed Sender would help against the server being changed to be actively malicious and trying to build social graphs. Second - even metadata concerns aside, a centralized system is just not resilient. Proposals like Chat Control are A LOT more easily enforceable with them than with tiny selfhosted servers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    I know that Signal runs on US cloud infrastructure (like AWS IRRC)

    Doesn't change a thing about it's security or what they hand to disclose to authorities

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    I know that Signal runs on US cloud infrastructure

    And only that one.

    Signal dev is quite adamant on not letting people have their own servers, select a EU provider (yeah, EU is nazifying, but at least it's a large enough second-hand basket) or host the (suppossedly zero-knowledge) messages on one's own infrastructure. I'd say that's curious.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)