There is alt-text in the post's body. It was too long to put here.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago* (5 children)

    You seem to be misinformed. Signals architecture is explicitly designed in a way to minimise metadata as much as possible. You can look up the data they had to hand over due to lawsuits, it was absolutely minimal

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    First - I'm not sure Sealed Sender would help against the server being changed to be actively malicious and trying to build social graphs. Second - even metadata concerns aside, a centralized system is just not resilient. Proposals like Chat Control are A LOT more easily enforceable with them than with tiny selfhosted servers.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    I know that Signal runs on US cloud infrastructure (like AWS IRRC)

    Doesn't change a thing about it's security or what they hand to disclose to authorities

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 1 year ago

    I know that Signal runs on US cloud infrastructure

    And only that one.

    Signal dev is quite adamant on not letting people have their own servers, select a EU provider (yeah, EU is nazifying, but at least it's a large enough second-hand basket) or host the (suppossedly zero-knowledge) messages on one's own infrastructure. I'd say that's curious.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)