Amends (2018-05-23) (discuss.online)
submitted 1 year ago by to c/pbf@discuss.online
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 39 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I agree, but a tiger doesn't breed antelope into being, and feed them at the expense of all life on earth just so they can have a nice meal.

If you're hunting, fine. They were eating grass and stuff from the ecosystem.

If you're farming then you're creating massive amounts of waste to generate meat.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [โ€“] 27 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    That's basically the same thing as what they said though.

    And let's be honest, if a tiger was capable of farming livestock, it probably would.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [โ€“] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Tigers are big cats, hence they are like their little domestic cousins, lazy as fuck. I doubt tigers would enjoy having a job.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [โ€“] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Tigers aren't as smart as you think.

    If they were smart, they'd do what their domestic counterparts do - make themselves masters of a family of human slaves. They'd be much better off at the price of a few purrs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [โ€“] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Sure, but that right is in question. Being a part of the ecosystem is fine, animal or human (which is an animal). It's when we destroy the ecosystem to satisfy ourselves where I question the right to do so. It doesn't matter what the animal is, except we're the only animals capable of doing so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment