Existential Comics | Website

Alt Text“At the heart of Batman’s being, like all theater kids, is a boundless narcissism that eats away at his core.”

ExplanationMany versions of Batman have a strict “no killing” rule, which is exactly the kind of intuition the Trolley Problem is attacking. Why is it different to actively kill someone vs passively letting five people die? In particular, Batman’s version seems to be a sort of “honor code”, which something close to a moral system, but it is entirely inward looking. In other words, fulfilling the honor system doesn’t do good for the world, it elevates the status of the honorable man. In a sense it’s the worst possible way to answer a moral question, “I want to kill the five people because I personally would lose something (my honor)”. Also its pretty showy to dress up as a bat. One might even call him a weirdo.

Transcript8 Panel Comic

Panel 1: The Riddler stands at the lever explaining his setup of the classic Trolley Problem. Tied to one track are 5 people, and tied to the diverted track is 1 person. A trolley is prepared to mow down the 5 people unless the lever is pulled, diverting it to the path with one person.

Riddler: Alright Batman riddle me this. A trolley is moving down this track and is going to kill five people, but if you switch tracks it will only kill one, do you pull the lever?

Panel 2: Batman shakes his fist at the Riddler

Batman: Curse your implausible games, Riddler!

Panel 3: Batman hesitates in front of the lever, his hand shaking.

Batman: The right thing to do is save five people, but I have sworn to my code of ethics to never kill!

Panel 4: The Riddler exults in the devious dilemma delaying Batman’s decision.

Batman: I cannot do it! I cannot be the one to kill directly!

Riddler: Looks like the Batman has failed Philosophy 101! HAHAHAHAHA!

Panel 5: Batman watches as the trolley splatters 5 people across the track as the Riddler continues in his exultations.

Panel 6: Batman now sits in his Batcave as his Alfred arrives with his dinner on a covered tray.

Alfred: But what I don’t understand Sir, is how upholding your moral code can have more value than their lives?

Panel 7: Batman smoking a cigarette puts on his best grizzled and hard boiled face.

Batman: Because I’m a narcissist, Alfred. I value my own ego above everything, and I didn’t want to lose the “no killing” thing, because I like bragging about it. That’s all.

Panel 8: Alfred is shocked at Batman’s response.

Alfred: Really, I never thought so…

Batman: I dress up as a bat to fight crime. Of course I’m a narcissist. Your kind of a moron, Alfred, honestly.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 4 hours ago*

I actually agree with that analysis completely. If you really press me, I would say yes, pull the lever in the trolley problem. But the problem is trying to take that as a principle to be applied to other situations. When we actually look at practical situations, there are all sorts of other factors specific to that situation that need to be evaluated, and it's rare that the difference actually comes down to whether or not you're applying a utilitarian framework. That sort of thinking also limits what kinds of solutions we're prone to consider.

The actual, real world solution to the trolley problem would be first of all tracking down whoever's tying people to tracks and making them stop, and implementing better safety mechanisms to prevent trolleys from getting out of control. These solutions are things pretty much everyone can agree with, regardless of their moral framework. And I would expect that even if someone in that situation made the wrong decision from a given framework, people would see them as faced with an impossible choice in a traumatic situation, and even if they made the right decision, it wouldn't be considered "problem solved."

What is more useful in informing our actual moral decision making is to pull examples from actual reality, in cases that are actually relevant to the decision in question. Because of the doctor example, you cannot just say, "This is like the trolley problem so we should do this," in practical cases, because real life is more complex.

  • source
  • parent