Continuing with the supreme confidence of the ignorant

Reducio was my counter move, the missing major premise is one of the possible diagnoses of informal fallacy that would apply to the original comment

Being a pompous prat is picking a logic fight, misusing and misunderstanding the terminology, then pretending that you were aloof the whole time

It's pretty obvious that you lack the fundamental capability to break down an argument in formal terms, but you chose to use sophistries and sockpuppet votes instead of just frankly admitting your ignorance