Edit: Seems like the Mod-Logs are public, so it’s not ‚secretly‘. My preferred mobile app doesn’t show this and for me the post just disappeared from my history.

Anyway, the breach of rule I allegedly did is obviously an excuse to block inconvenient opinions as it’s not at all related.

There is no censorship in Ba Sing Se
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (8 children)

Ok Captain Logic, show us your deconstruction of the argument and how it's logically sound since you didn't engage with mine at all

I'm especially interested in how you believe the argument should move from the single premise to the very distant conclusion without a missing premise

I predict that instead of actually analyzing the argument formally you will "Nuh-uh!", then declare victory like you have done multiple previous times in this thread

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 10 hours ago (7 children)

    I engaged with yours sufficiently to establish it's bollocks, which is enough for me. See ya!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago (5 children)

    Given you added your "prediction" at the same time as I made reply it's not much of a prediction. But yeah no, I'm not here to defend the original argument, I'm here to debunk morons.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago (4 children)

    Debunking is when you don't even understand the concept of a missing major premise and then act superior apparently

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago (3 children)

    Failing logic is when you describe "missing premise" as "reductio ad absurdum".

    Failing languages is when you interpret a light-hearted comment as a logic exercise.

    Both at the same time is... special!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

    Continuing with the supreme confidence of the ignorant

    Reducio was my counter move, the missing major premise is one of the possible diagnoses of informal fallacy that would apply to the original comment

    Being a pompous prat is picking a logic fight, misusing and misunderstanding the terminology, then pretending that you were aloof the whole time

    It's pretty obvious that you lack the fundamental capability to break down an argument in formal terms, but you chose to use sophistries and sockpuppet votes instead of just frankly admitting your ignorance

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments