49
Musicians: do you notice your ability to hear and understand music is different depending on the instrument you play? (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 1 day ago by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
23 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I main on fingerstyle guitar, but I find my aural understanding on guitar feels impeded. Now I know music theory and how the fretboard works, but translating it is so damn laborious.

I've played other instruments, and this is what I've noticed about their impact:

  1. Penny whistle. It's mostly in one key. The root will always be the same fingering and the fifth will always be the same fingering. I think this helps with making associations with sound and scale degree, as opposed to more chromatic instruments played in different keys. [Also used a transposing electronic digital instrument to the same effect.]

  2. Clarinet: Having to figure out the fingerings made me painfully aware of key signatures and where the sharps and flats are. On guitar you can smoothly shift up or down a fret without much thought or just play in position, but on clarinet there is often a specific button or button combo you need to get one specific note.

  3. This is the big one: Piano. You do need to bring a little theory into it to know what chords you're playing, but the actual NOTES you are playing are immediately obvious, and since I'm building all these chords myself, I know exactly where the third is and how to lower it to make a major a minor, or where to add a major seventh, so I can also very quickly ask myself, "What if went with a minor chord here instead" and almost instantly be able to play it. On guitar, there's a tendency to just memorize chords as shapes without knowing where the chord tones are because each shape has them in a different configuration (which is why eyes-closed arpeggio exercises are absolutely vital for guitarists).

[On piano it's also easier to play the same inversions over and over again, which might help you learn the sound. You can play a whole song with Root-3rd-Fifth if you want, but on guitar, the common chord shapes are a kaleidoscope of chord tones. For instance, common chord tones on root chords:

C: O-R-3-5-R-3
F: R-5-R-3-5-R
G: R-3-5-R-3-R
]

I'm curious about violin, too, because I'm betting needing to intonation just right really sharpens your ear.

What's your experience?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I grew up as a pianist but joined choir in college and stuck with it. One thing that is really hard as a singer is knowing exactly what note to sing. On an instrument, you put your fingers in the right place and play, and you get a note (tuning aside—that’s a whole other issue). Whereas with the voice, you have to know what that note sounds like before you can sing it. For easy music, that’s fine, but my chorus sings a lot of new music, some of which has funky scales or is just straight up atonal. My musicianship has had to level up, and I’m a way better musician and sight reader because of it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 3 points 1 day ago* (6 children)

    100% agree on singing, but, tragically, you do have to have a certain ability to get into and develop chorally. All my experience in choir has been singing whatever note the person singing next to me is singing before I abandoned the choir in shame and anxiety.

    Singing scales and arpeggios and working on identifying scale degrees are the best things I've done for my ear, but I'm still pretty limited. I'm trying to work singing thirds off random diatonic scale tones, but it's a slog. One exercise I used to do was to make a deck of cards from Ace to 8, shuffle them, and then lay them out a few of the time and see if I could sing their scale degrees... I got pretty good, but identification still lagged behind my production (that is to say, I could sing the scale tone much easier than I could recognize it), so I got discouraged.

    I'm not a huge fan of reading music, because I depended on it so heavily, but it was very rote "finger go here" style of playing, so I think it actively detracted from my musicianship. Just the other day I found myself tinkering on the piano and trying to figure out the melody of a Chopin Polonaise by ear and I think I did pretty good, even understanding some of the musical turns (based around the seventh and the second) and pondering what the key change and chord implications for those melodies might be... I'd probably never be able to figure out a whole Chopin piece by ear, but I think I'd be a better musician for having tried than memorizing the piece completely as a collection of notes.

    Right now my musical project is to learn some simple left hand patterns and be able to play melodies I know in the right hand, and eventually just vamp on both hands From what I've read about Chopin, that's how he built his own skills, bro would apparently just riff for hours.

    But, damn, if I could look at a piece of music and hear it, that would be fucking amazing.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (5 children)

    Give yourself some credit! You should also take what I said with a grain of salt: not only do I seem to have a naturally excellent ear (whereas rhythm and sight reading were where I struggled), but I also went on to major in music theory and had a very, uh, aggressive theory teacher in college who made us sight-sing on solfège for exams, even atonal passages (as in, we had to choose something to be DO and stick with it). It means I learned how to hear intervals in my head, so if I can figure out what the interval is on the page, theoretically I can sing it. (It does get way harder if there is funny stuff going on in other parts!)

    In my chorus, I’d say the vast majority of our singers learn by listening to a part track made by their section leaders. Which is essentially singing the same note as the person next to them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    I had to drop out of the one college theory class I took because I could just get learn intervals to save my life.... I kinda don't understand the obsession with intervals given what I understand how music works and don't understand why scale tones / solfege isn't more emphasized. I can see it's value, but it seems like a level of abstraction from actual music that most people don't need.

    My experiments in choir predate the MP3s and YouTube, so I never had a part track...

    Any insight into learning how to hear chords? I can see the road for developing pitch recognition, but chord recognition is a mystery. The two paths seems to be: a) hear all the individual notes of the chord and identify the root (through all inversions)--which seems crazy hard and b) just sort get a feel for what the chord sounds like (through all inversion)--which also seems like a hard ask.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

    Haha you’re not gonna like it! It’s intervals 🤣

    The way different chords are made up is essentially stacking different intervals (usually 3rds but not always) on top of each other. But there are different types of thirds: major and minor. (Also diminished and augmented, but those sound like other intervals so im gonna ignore those for now.) A major triad is a major third on the bottom and a minor third stacked on top. A minor third is the opposite. Being able to recognize the tonal quality of a major third vs a minor third is key for my ability to recognize chords. Maybe others have some alternative suggestions. Also, the more you do it, the more natural it becomes. I was inundated with this stuff at an early age when my brain was a sponge.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    So let's say you have C E G--a major third plus a minor third.

    If you have E G C, it would be a minor third plus a fourth.

    If you had G C E, it would be a fourth plus a major third.

    And that's just for basic triads in closed positions. Add extensions and open phrasings, it would get really complicated. I kinda wonder if you interval wizards are learning something along the way of interval training without being explicitly aware of it?

    When you were learning chord inversions, did you listen to the samples and identify all the intervals and determine the root through a process of deduction? Or was there a moment when things sort of snapped into place and you could hear the root of the chord automatically, without thinking about intervals?

    Because for me, I can hear the major and minor qualities of a chord without identifying any intervals, and ditto for a major and dominant sevenths. I imagine there's a rootness and a thirdness and fifthness I could I also teach myself to identify.

    There's also the possibility that different people just learn differently, and that intervals are just hard for me and easier for others, and scale degrees are my best way in.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    Hmm, honestly because I learned so much of this as a kid, it’s hard to pinpoint it. A lot of it is probably instinct solidified by repetition. Yes, I absolutely can identify the root of the chord without actively thinking about the intervals, and since inversions were drilled into me during piano lessons and I had to demonstrate them on exams, I didn’t just hear them; I did them. I’m a big believer in learning by doing, and boy did I do a lot of them. So … yeah, it’s probably just a lot of time and a whole lot of exposure.

    Same with intervals. Lots of people use tricks, like knowing the beginnings of certain songs are a specific interval (“Here comes the bride” is a fourth, etc.) but I haven’t had to use those tricks for a long, long time. I sure did teach them to undergrads when I was in grad school, though.

    For what it’s worth, solfège is essentially learning the scale degrees and using them to hear things. I definitely hear scale degrees and I don’t think that’s a “wrong” way to go about it, either. Far from it! Whatever works for you is great, and don’t let anyone tell you differently.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 20 hours ago

    I think the main thing is that I am getting better and I can see the musical road for myself.

    I think it's also true that different instruments can help unlock different skills, and it can be more fun and direct than abstract ear training (though I'm trying to incorporate a little ear training into the songs I'm working on, mostly singing arpeggios).

    Playing piano more recently, I realized how much I disconnect from thinking about what chords I'm playing on guitar--they're just this shape and that shape, but piano is so delightfully transparent.

    Another bonus is movement is so much more obvious. I'm playing a song with chords that go from Am to F to D to C to E, all major, and the root movement of F to F# (3 of D) to G (5 of C) to G# (3 of E) was just immediately obvious to me on the piano, easy to play, and it sounds beautiful. I'll work it out on guitar later today, but it'll take a lot more effort.

    Great talking with you!

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent