219
Gateshead woman with alopecia accused of being male while using female toilet at Tesco (www.chroniclelive.co.uk)
submitted 17 hours ago by [A] to c/unitedkingdom@feddit.uk
43 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The 37-year-old, who has had the hair loss condition since she was a child, said she was left shocked when a cleaner at the Trinity Square shop asked her "Are you aware you're in the female toilet?" She said she became distressed and burst into tears.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 28 points 15 hours ago (9 children)

"I can understand the cautiousness from a business point of view but they’ve also got to be aware of diversity and people being different. They should not make assumptions on visible differences.

Isn't that exactly what the law forces though? To somehow decide based on looks alone who should be in which toilet?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 11 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

    Couldn't they also just not do that? Surely the law doesn't require them to hire someone to police the toilets.

    Gender neutral toilets could also get around it surely. Worked in multiple places with them and no one has ever cared.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

    Surely the law doesn’t require them to hire someone to police the toilets.

    It pretty much does. Not specifically to have someone dedicated to check everyone, but they have to take reasonable measures and a member of staff speaking up would fall under that.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    Why though? Its a toilet. Couldn't they just say the sign is only suggested genders. Women can clean men's toilets still.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 hours ago*

    Point is, there are malicious people, both men and women. I think there have to be security measures in order for it to be impossible (or at least, highly difficult) to do things as spying or putting hidden cameras. But of course, that shouldn't be done based only in the looks, but mostly in the behaviour. Anyone with a suspicious behaviour should be policed, but that's like something that should be taken for granted in the first place.

    Women can clean men's toilets still.

    About this, I ask rhetorically: would you also say that "men can clean women's toilets still"? I personally doubt it given a lot of previous experiences on this topic, and I believe that in such a case one must be consistent: either both or neither.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

    Exactly what the law enforces will differ by jurisdiction

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

    This is not devolved and I believe the law being refered to is the one that has been clarified in the recent guidance after a supreme court decision.

    Health is normally devolved, but this is counted as "human rights".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    Sire but most of "the world" OS not in the US

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 57 minutes ago

    Sorry I think we are misunderstanding each other. I was talking about the UK as this is a UK specific story and community. I assumed that you were talking about the constituent countries in the UK that have different laws in your previous comment.

    May I ask how it is you got here? - I am curious seeing as you're on a PieFed instance.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent